基于社会网络分析的东南亚地缘关系研究
A social-network-based study on geo-relations in Southeast Asia
查看参考文献38篇
|
文摘
|
在全球化背景下,考察国家间地缘关系需将其置于宏观地缘格局中。安全等传统地缘政治因素仍对世界格局的变化起着重要推动作用,不可忽视。鉴于此,本文构建了地缘系统视角下地缘关系分析框架,结合社会网络分析方法,定量研究冷战后东南亚地缘系统内地缘经济和地缘政治(安全)关系的整体与结构特征,测度系统内各国在经济和安全上的权力特征以及依赖关系,并初步探索东南亚地缘政治(安全)依赖关系形成机制。结果显示:①冷战后东南亚地缘系统内对东南亚10国地缘经济权力总和最高国家的转移路径是从日本到美国再到中国;对东南亚10国地缘政治(安全)权力总和最高的国家始终是美国,2005年以后中国跃居至第二位,但与美国还有明显差距。在地缘经济领域,东南亚国家总体上对中国的依赖水平最高;在地缘政治(安全)领域,东南亚各国对美国及其盟友英、法、德等国的依赖较高,中俄也不可忽视;“东南亚在经济上靠中国、安全上靠美国”的地缘政治论述可见一斑。②国家实力差异是产生安全依赖关系的根本动力;国家间地理距离可以调节安全依赖的具体方向;国家的政治地理属性差异是形成安全依赖和影响安全依赖程度的重要条件。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In the context of globalization, geopolitical relationships should be considered under the general geo- structure. Traditional geopolitical factors such as security are still the indispensable drivers of global patterns. In this study, social network analysis was used to construct an analysis framework from the perspective of a geo-system. Using this framework, we investigated the holistic and structural characteristics of the geo-economic and geopolitical relationships in Southeast Asian geo-system, quantified the power and reliance degrees of each country in terms of geo-economics and geopolitics (security), and also explored the potential mechanisms of security reliance. The results show that: (1) Since the end of the Cold War, the United States (US) replaced Japan as the country that exerted the strongest geo- economic influence on Southeast Asian countries, and then was supplanted by China. In terms of geopolitics, the United States is the most influential country over Southeast Asia. Although China has taken the second seat since 2005, its geopolitical influence is still far behind that of the US. Overall, from a geo-economic perspective, Southeast Asian countries seem to be more dependent on China than on other countries, while geopolitically (i.e., security) they rely mostly on the US and its traditional allies, including the United Kingdom, France and Germany. There is enough evidence to support the well- known adage that "Southeast Asia relies on China in economy, but on US in security". (2) Differences in national power are the essential drivers of security reliance. The specific direction of security reliance is primarily controlled by the geographic distance between countries. In addition, differences in political geographic traits are also essential factors that shape security reliance. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2018,73(10):2014-2030 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201810014
|
|
关键词
|
地缘关系
;
地缘系统
;
安全依赖机制
;
社会网络分析
;
东南亚
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院重点部署项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6348994
|
参考文献 共
38
共2页
|
|
1.
陆大道. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考.
地理学报,2013,68(6):723-727
|
CSCD被引
112
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Dalby S. The critical geopolitics constellation: Problematizing fusions of geographical knowledge and power.
Political Geography,1996,15(6/7):451-456
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Routledge P. Critical geopolitics and terrains of resistance.
Political Geography,1996,15(6/7):509-531
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Dodds K. Political geography III: Critical geopolitics after ten years.
Progress in Human Geography,2001,25(3):469-484
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Hyndman J. Towards a feminist geopolitics.
Canadian Geographer,2001,45(2):210-222
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Hyndman J. Mind the gap: Bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics.
Political Geography,2004,23(3):307-322
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Pain R. Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics.
Progress in Human Geography,2009,33(4):466-486
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Dittmer J. Captain America's empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture, and post-9/11 geopolitics.
Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2005,95(3):626-643
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Ragazzi F. A comparative analysis of diaspora policies.
Political Geography,2014,41:74-89
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Beck L. Implications of hydro-political dependency for international water cooperation and conflict: Insights from new data.
Political Geography,2014,42:23-33
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Daras N J. Systemic geopolitical modeling. Part 1: Prediction of geopolitical events.
GeoJournal,2015,80(5):653-678
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
McDoom O S. Predicting violence within genocide: A model of elite competition and ethnic segregation from Rwanda.
Political Geography,2014,42:34-45
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Xierali I M. Explaining foreign diplomatic presence in the US with spatial models: A liberal spatial perspective.
GeoJournal,2006,67(1):85-101
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
葛汉文. 批判地缘政治学的发展与地缘政治研究的未来.
国际观察,2010(4):42-48
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
胡志丁. 基于批判地缘政治学视角解读经典地缘政治理论.
地理学报,2015,70(6):851-863
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
杜德斌. 1990年以来中国地理学之地缘政治学研究进展.
地理研究,2015,34(2):199-212
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
胡志丁. 我国政治地理学研究的新发展:地缘环境探索.
人文地理,2013,28(5):123-128
|
CSCD被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
郭焕成. 国际地缘经济板块及其内在机制研究.
经济地理,1994,14(2):1-5
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Wang Shufang. Spatio-temporal changes and their reasons to the geopolitical influence of China and the US in South Asia.
Sustainability,2015,7(1):1064-1080
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
胡志丁. 南亚地缘环境的空间格局与分异规律研究.
地理科学,2013,33(6):685-692
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问