地方创业与产业集群互动关系的研究进展与展望
Research progress and prospect on the relationship between industrial clusters and local entrepreneurship
查看参考文献67篇
文摘
|
本文依托国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于地方创业视角的产业集群转型机制研究——以珠江三角洲为例”,采用个人—组织—外部环境交互反馈的分析框架,从产业集群促进地方创业产生和发展的环境,以及地方创业主体战略促进集群转型两个方面,梳理现有关于地方创业与集群发展的互动关系的成果。主要研究成果为:就地方创业的孵化而言,集群内成功创业家正面的示范效应是促进创业意愿产生的主要因素,而个人在集群内商业网络的社会根植程度能促进潜在创业家对原所在集群的区位偏好,从而促进创业活动的本地化发展。就地方创业的成长而言,应该关注集群内组织生态结构和创业生态系统环境,以及新创企业成立后与本地母体企业的动态组织联系。同时,地方创业主体也是产业集群的积极塑造者。以珠江三角洲为例的研究表明,在核心城市(广州)的成熟集群内,新一代创业企业通过自主区位选择可以改变集群的空间形态和层次;而在边缘城市(揭阳),本地企业的制度创业行为是集群升级的重要途径,本地创业家通过多地理尺度的认同反馈战略,吸引外部资源并构建跨地方的合作网络。最后对地方创业与产业集群互动关系的研究内容和方法进行展望。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Drawing from the key research results of the National Natural Science Foundation supported youth project "Study on industrial cluster restructuring mechanism from the perspective of local entrepreneurship— Case study in the Pearl River Delta, China" (No. 41301109), this article summarizes the literature and research results on the interacting relationships between local entrepreneurship and industrial clusters. It focuses on two aspects—the cluster environment that facilitates the emergence and growth of local entrepreneurship, and the agency and strategies of local entrepreneurs in industrial cluster restructuring. The primary research results are as follows. First, successful entrepreneurs in the clusters enhance the entrepreneurial intentions of others. Also, the embeddedness in personal relations with suppliers and customers has proven to exert significant impact on the locational preferences toward the clusters of origin, thus driving the localization of entrepreneurial activities. Second, cluster ecology and entrepreneurial ecosystem should become the focal point of study on the growth of entrepreneurial activities. The dynamic organizational relations with the parent companies are also important for the growth of spin-offs in the clusters. Meanwhile, local entrepreneurs active make and shape the clusters. In the mature industrial cluster in the core city of Guangzhou of the case study area—the Pearl River Delta, it is found that the new- generation start- ups could influence the spatial evolution of industrial cluster by their locational choice behaviors. In the periphery city, Jieyang, the institutional entrepreneurship carried out by the local entrepreneurs is an important way to upgrade and restructure the traditional industries. The interscalar strategies are applied by the local entrepreneurs to build up global pipelines, by which the resources and networks at different spatial scales are flexibly converged and leveraged. At the end of the article, future prospects with regard to the interacting relationship between local entrepreneurship and industrial cluster, both in terms of research context and methodology, has been discussed. |
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2018,37(6):739-749 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.06.001
|
关键词
|
地方创业
;
产业集群
;
集群生态
;
主体能动性
;
进展
|
地址
|
华南师范大学地理科学学院, 广州, 510631
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
综述型 |
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6276556
|
参考文献 共
67
共4页
|
1.
符文颖. 地方创业与集群转型:一个理论整合的视角.
地理科学,2016,36(5):715-723
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
2.
符文颖. 产业转型背景下创业区位选择和集群空间演化.
地理科学,2017,37(6):833-840
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
3.
贺灿飞. 产业地理集中、产业集聚与产业集群:测量与辨识.
地理科学进展,2007,26(2):1-13
|
CSCD被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
4.
林涛. 中国产业集群研究中的主体能动性与多方验证方法.
人文地理,2008,23(4):69-74
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
5.
刘志高. 产业集群形成的演化经济地理学研究评述.
地理科学进展,2011,30(6):652-657
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
6.
吕文栋. 浙江产业集群的动力机制--基于企业家的视角.
中国工业经济,2005(4):86-93
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
7.
苗长虹. 从区域地理学到新区域主义:20世纪西方地理学区域主义的发展脉络.
经济地理,2005,25(5):593-599
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
8.
马海涛. 行动者网络理论视角下的产业集群学习网络构建.
经济地理,2009,29(8):1327-1331
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
9.
王琛. 产业集群对技术创新的影响——以电子信息产业为例.
地理研究,2012,31(8):1375-1386
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Acs Z. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship.
Small Business Economics,2013,41(4):757-774
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Audretsch D B. Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions.
Research Policy,2005,34(8):1191-1202
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Baumol W J. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive.
The Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(5):893-921
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Belussi F. Life-cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts.
European Planning Studies,2009,17(4):505-528
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Binz C. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-Site water recycling in Beijing.
Economic Geography,2016,92(2):172-200
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Boschma R A. New industries and windows of locational opportunity: A long-term analysis of Belgium.
Erdkunde,1997,51(1):12-22
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Boschma R A. Do spinoff dynamics or agglomeration externalities drive industry clustering? A reappraisal of Steven Klepper's work.
Industrial and Corporate Change,2015,24(4):859-873
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Boschma R A. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography.
Journal of Economic Geography,2006,6(3):273-302
|
CSCD被引
54
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Boschma R A. Technological relatedness and regional branching.
Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation and innovation,2011:64-81
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Bosma N. Entrepreneurship and role models.
Journal of Economic Psychology,2012,33(2):410-424
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Buenstorf G. B2C-bubble to cluster: The dot-com boom, spin-off entrepreneurship, and regional agglomeration.
Journal of evolutionary Economics,2009,19(3):349-378
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|