帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

基于消费责任制的碳排放核算及全球环境压力
Global carbon emissions and its environmental impact analysis based on a consumption accounting principle

查看参考文献67篇

钟章奇 1   姜磊 1,2 *   何凌云 3   王铮 4,5   柏玲 6  
文摘 因区域间贸易而转移的碳排放对于全球各个国家或者地区的碳排放核算及其减排责任划分具有重要而深远的影响。通过构建多区域投入产出分析模型和基于扩展的STIRPAT模型,本文核算了全球39个主要国家基于消费责任制的碳排放,并在此基础上深入探讨了全球环境压力的影响因素问题。研究发现:首先,从以净流出为主的中国和俄罗斯来看,尽管贸易给这些地区带来了大量的资源,但随之会产生严重的区域生态环境问题。而对于美国和欧盟等地区来说,这些国家或者地区通过全球贸易规避了大量的碳减排责任。此外,在全球贸易中,区域净流出的贸易隐含碳排放越小,基于消费责任制核算的区域碳排放量就越大,故而在全球减排目标分配中承担的减排任务也需相应地增加。全球贸易隐含碳排放净流出量较大的地区主要位于亚洲和东欧等地,而净流出量最小的地区主要是以西欧和北美等高度发达的经济体为主。其次,就基于消费责任制核算下的全球环境压力而言,人口因素和富裕程度是导致全球环境压力不断增加的两个重要因素,而提高生产技术水平以及逐渐提高清洁能源在总能源消费中的比重是推动全球节能减排、缓解全球环境压力的有效途径。
其他语种文摘 Embodied carbon emissions in international trade plays a crucial role in shaping regional commitments towards emission reduction in the context of global climate change and greenhouse gas emission policy. Based on the multi-region input-output analytical framework and the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model, this paper analyzes the embodiment of global emissions in trade, so as to explore the characteristics of global carbon emissions under a consumption accounting principle for 39 countries from 1995 to 2011, and investigates the determinants of the embodied emissions in global trade based on an extended STIRPAT model. One finding from this study is that some countries like China and Russia are characterized by the highest net outflow of embodied emissions in trade, while other regions in the world provide strong support for their economic growth through thick trade relationships, and more importantly, comparative advantages are also obtained by their industries associated with trades. Under the production-based accounting principle, these countries like China and Russia have also been accountable for a large volume of emissions embodied in global trade, and thus would face huge pressures to curtail carbon emissions, which, in turn, may also impede the local economic development. Moreover, the lower the net carbon emissions embodied in regional trade, the higher the carbon emissions under a consumption accounting principle. Therefore, the relevant countries should bear greater emissions reduction responsibilities from the perspective of the production- based accounting principle in the context of global climate policy. Additionally, the analysis results show that a larger deal of net carbon emissions embodied in global trade are mainly from Asia and Eastern Europe, while a smaller amount of net carbon emissions embodied in global trade are primarily found in highly economically developed regions like Western Europe and Northern America. Another important finding is that, for environmental impact analysis regarding the corresponding influencing factors, the increase of carbon emissions embodied in global trade would be primarily caused by population and economic development level. For wealthy countries or regions such as the USA and the EU, via trade relations with their main trading partners, their environmental impacts, particularly carbon emissions associated with their consumption, may be transferred to other regions. On that basis, facing severe pressures to curb carbon emissions embodied in international trade in climate policy, these regions should take proactive initiatives like carrying out technology transfer and/or providing financial aid to improve notably other developing countries' production technology. In addition, in order to reduce the impact of trade on the emissions of global economies on global environment, the increase in the overall share of clean energy in the energy consumption structure and energy efficiency improvement should be also an effective policy option.
来源 地理学报 ,2018,73(3):442-459 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201803005
关键词 贸易隐含碳 ; 投入产出分析 ; 环境压力 ; 能源结构 ; 全球
地址

1. 浙江财经大学经济学院, 杭州, 310018  

2. 南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院, 南京, 210016  

3. 中国矿业大学管理学院(徐州), 徐州, 221116  

4. 华东师范大学, 地理信息科学教育部重点实验室, 上海, 200241  

5. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 北京, 100080  

6. 南昌大学经济管理学院, 南昌, 330031

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 社会科学总论;环境科学基础理论
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目 ;  国家自然科学基金项目 ;  国家教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6205185

参考文献 共 67 共4页

1.  Wachsmuth D. Expand the frontiers of urban sustainability. Nature,2016,536(7617):391-393 CSCD被引 5 次    
2.  Kagawa S. CO_2 emission clusters within global supply chain networks: Implications for climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Change,2015,35:486-496 CSCD被引 5 次    
3.  彭水军. 碳排放的国家责任核算方案. 经济研究,2016,3:137-150 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  唐志鹏. 出口对中国区域碳排放影响的空间效应测度——基于1997-2007年区域间投入产出表的实证分析. 地理学报,2014,69(10):1403-1413 CSCD被引 15 次    
5.  . World resources institute, world business council for sustainable development. WRI/WBCSD. The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard (revised edition) CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Wiedmann T. A definition of carbon footprint. Ecological Economics Research Trends,2008,1:1-11 CSCD被引 26 次    
7.  Hertwich E G. Carbon footprint of nations: A global trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science & Technology,2009,43(16):6414-6420 CSCD被引 61 次    
8.  Seto K C. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2012,109(40):16083-16088 CSCD被引 118 次    
9.  Nejat P. A global review of energy consumption, CO_2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO_2 emitting countries). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015,43:843-862 CSCD被引 32 次    
10.  Schandl H. Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: Scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,132:45-56 CSCD被引 7 次    
11.  Lin B. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy,2010,38(1):613-621 CSCD被引 18 次    
12.  Chen G. Transnational city carbon footprint networks-exploring carbon links between Australian and Chinese cities. Applied Energy,2016,184(12):1082-1092 CSCD被引 3 次    
13.  Weber C L. Embodied environmental emissions in U.S. international trade, 1997-2004. Environmental Science & Technology,2007,41(14):4875-4881 CSCD被引 23 次    
14.  Peters G P. CO_2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science & Technology,2008,42(5):1401-1407 CSCD被引 73 次    
15.  Peters G P. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Climatic Change,2008,86(1/2):51-66 CSCD被引 29 次    
16.  Scott K. An integration of net imported emissions into climate change targets. Environmental Science and Policy,2015,52(10):150-157 CSCD被引 2 次    
17.  Arce G. Carbon emissions embodied in international trade: The post-China era. Applied Energy,2016,184(12):1063-1072 CSCD被引 2 次    
18.  李方一. 中国区域间隐含污染转移研究. 地理学报,2013,68(6):791-801 CSCD被引 21 次    
19.  Davis S J. Consumption-based accounting of CO_2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107(12):5687-5692 CSCD被引 73 次    
20.  Chen G Q. Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological inputoutput modeling. Ecological Modelling,2011,222(14):2362-2376 CSCD被引 9 次    
引证文献 5 篇

1 姜磊 基于空间计量模型的氮氧化物排放驱动因素分析:基于卫星观测数据 地理科学,2020,40(3):364-373
CSCD被引 2 次

2 胡振 西部城镇家庭能源消费及其碳排放的区域特征研究—基于中国家庭追踪调查的调研数据 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(4):1-8
CSCD被引 4 次

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号