帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

书面语言中情绪信息的加工
Processing of emotional information in written language

查看参考文献141篇

曹阳 1,2   王琳 1,3,4 *  
文摘 语言不仅能够表达概念信息,也能承载情绪信息.研究语言中蕴含的情绪信息加工,对情感神经科学和语言理解的研究都具有重要意义.行为学、脑电和磁共振成像的研究表明,在不同加工阶段,情绪词中情绪信息的加工既表现出自动化加工又表现出控制性加工;情绪词语加工具有优先性和优势性,词汇加工的网络受到了情绪加工网络的影响.当情绪词出现在句子中时,情绪凸显性使情绪词语的加工优先于句子水平上的语义加工.另外,句子水平上情绪信息加工的研究发现,情绪性句子可以激活情绪加工相关的脑区,并且相比中性句子可以更强地激活语言加工相关的脑区.因此,语言网络与情绪网络有着复杂的联系.
其他语种文摘 Language conveys both semantic and emotional information. Emotional processing in language could not be easily explained by the current word recognition model, sentence processing model and discourse comprehension model. In order to uncover the characteristics of emotional processing in written language, the present review attempted to integrate findings from behavioral, event-related potential (ERP), and functional magnetic resonance imagining (fMRI) studies on emotional processing at multiple scales, such as words, sentences and discourses levels. First, previous studies have shown both automatic and controlled processes at different stages of emotional words processing. Some early ERP effects (before 300 ms: such as N1/P1, P2, EPN) as well as the activation of subcortical region (such as amygdala) have been taken as evidences for the rapid and automatic emotional processing. Some late ERP effects (such as late positive component after 500 ms) and the recruitment of higher-order brain areas (such as medial prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex) have been suggested to reflect the controlled processing of the emotion words. In addition, emotional connotation could enhance cortical responses at all stages of visual word processing such as the assembly of visual word form (up to 200 ms), semantic access (around 200 ms), allocation of attentional resources (around 300 ms), contextual analysis (around 400 ms), and sustained processing (around 500 ms). Moreover, the network of word reading is influenced by the emotional network as manifested by the enhanced engagement of lexical-semantic network when processing emotional words compared to neutral words. However, it remains unclear regarding the time locus of emotional effect with respect to the lexical access. Another important finding is that emotional words obtained prioritized processing no matter when they were presented in isolation or shown in contexts. The salience of emotion information could override detailed semantic analysis, as indicated by the lack of semantic violation effect when the violations occurred to emotion words. Also, the emotional dimension of sentences was prioritized when the emotional words were embedded in sentences, as indicated by the N400 effect to emotion words following neutral congruent contexts. Moreover, the influence of emotional word on sentence processing was sustained, as suggested by its influence on the processing of its following words in sentences. Finally, we showed that emotion can be induced directly by emotional words or implied by a series of neutral words (for example, “The boy fell asleep and never woke up again”). Both types of emotional sentences activated emotional brain network (such as amygdala, insula, medial prefrontal cortex), which in turn enhanced the involvement of language network (such as inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus) compared to neutral sentences. Therefore, the language and emotional networks are highly interactive. Overall, the current review summarized main findings regarding emotional processing in written language. We have shown that the study of emotional processing in language has significant importance for psycholinguistics and affective neuroscience. We proposed that it might be a useful approach to investigate emotional language processing from an embodiment perspective. Future studies could further investigate the functional connectivity of the emotional and language networks.
来源 科学通报 ,2018,63(2):148-163 【核心库】
DOI 10.1360/N972017-00701
关键词 情绪 ; 语言 ; 自动加工 ; 控制加工 ; 优先性 ; 交互作用
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049  

3. Department of Psychology, Tufts University, USA, Medford, 02155  

4. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA, Charlestown, 02129

语种 中文
文献类型 综述型
ISSN 0023-074X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金 ;  中国科学院心理研究所优秀青年研究者基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6185554

参考文献 共 141 共8页

1.  Lang P J. Motivated attention:Affect, activation, and action. Attention and Orienting:Sensory and Motivational Processes,1997:97-135 CSCD被引 2 次    
2.  Brody N. Lateralized affective priming of lateralized affectively valued target words. Neuropsychologia,1987,25:935-946 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  Bryden M. Right-hemispheric involvement in the perception and expression of emotion in normal humans. Neuropsychology of Human Emotion,1983:6-44 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Eviatar Z. The effects of word length and emotionality on hemispheric contribution to lexical decision. Neuropsychologia,1991,29:415-428 CSCD被引 1 次    
5.  Kanske P. Concreteness in emotional words:ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Res,2007,1148:138-148 CSCD被引 15 次    
6.  Landis T. Emotional words:What's so different from just words?. Cortex,2006,42:823-830 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  Ortigue S. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words. NeuroImage,2004,21:1242-1251 CSCD被引 2 次    
8.  Schapkin S A. Categorization of unilaterally presented emotional words:An ERP analysis. Acta Neurobiol Exp, (Wars.),2000,60:17-28 CSCD被引 8 次    
9.  Strauss E. Perception of emotional words. Neuropsychologia,1983,21:99-103 CSCD被引 3 次    
10.  Thierry G. The right hemisphere fails to orient to the negative valence of visually presented words. NeuroReport,2008,19:1231-1234 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Blonder L X. The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain,1991,114:1115-1127 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  Baas D. Lateralization of amygdala activation:A systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies. Brain Res Rev,2004,45:96-103 CSCD被引 5 次    
13.  Russell J A. A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol,1980,39:1161 CSCD被引 135 次    
14.  Murphy S T. Additivity of nonconscious affect:Combined effects of priming and exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol,1995,69:589 CSCD被引 10 次    
15.  Murphy S T. Affect, cognition, and awareness:Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc Psychol,1993,64:723 CSCD被引 32 次    
16.  Hermans D. A time course analysis of the affective priming effect. Cogn Emot,2001,15:143-165 CSCD被引 2 次    
17.  Naccache L. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition,2001,80:215-229 CSCD被引 9 次    
18.  刘宏艳. 词汇的概念义和情绪义加工的时间进程研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21:349-352 CSCD被引 5 次    
19.  Storbeck J. Preferences and inferences in encoding visual objects:A systematic comparison of semantic and affective priming. Pers Soc Psychol Bull,2004,30:81-93 CSCD被引 4 次    
20.  Klauer K C. List-context effects in evaluative priming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn,1997,23:246 CSCD被引 4 次    
引证文献 3 篇

1 庄乾 担忧个体自我图式的负性偏向 中国科学. 生命科学,2018,48(5):583-591
CSCD被引 0 次

2 张琪 自我相关性影响情绪词汇加工的时间进程 心理学报,2020,52(8):946-957
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号