加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)的效度和信度检验
Validity and reliability of the Chinese Version of the University of California at Los Angeles Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Revision 1,Children version)
查看参考文献26篇
|
文摘
|
目的:检验加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)(UCLA PTSD-RI)在灾后儿童中的效度和信度。方法:选取辽宁省抚顺市受灾地区的6所中小学(4~9年级)学生1593人[年龄8~16岁,平均(11±2)岁],将其随机分为两部分,一部分(n=796)用于探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=797)用于验证性因素分析。使用抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简版(DASS-21)评估效标效度。结果:探索性因素分析显示共有3个因子,累计可解释的方差为50%;验证性因素分析表明三因素结构各项指标拟合良好(χ~2/df=3.87,GFI=0.93,RFI=0.96,CFI=097,NNFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.06)。量表的3个维度得分与DASS-21的3个维度得分呈正相关(r=0.52~0.70,均P<0.001)。量表的内部一致性信度和分半信度分别为0.90和0.87。结论:本研究提示,加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)具有良好的效度和信度,可用于灾后儿童创伤后应激障碍的评估。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective:To test the validity and reliability of the University of California at Los Angeles Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Revision 1,Children version) (UCLA PTSD-RI)in Chinese Children after flood.Methods:On the principle of convenient sampling,the students were chosen from 6 schools in Liaoning Province where was hit by flood.Totally 1593 students [aged 8-16 years,average (11±2) years of age] completed the UCLA PTSD-RI.They were randomly divided into two groups for exploratory factor analysis (n=796) and confirmatory factor analysis (n=797) respectively.The 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale(DASS-21) were used to evaluate the criterion validity.Results:The result of exploratory factor analysis indicated UCLA PTSD-RI consisted of 3 factors,accounting for 50% of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis identified that a three-factor model fit well (χ~2/df=3.87,GFI=0.93,RFI=0.96,CFI=097,NNFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.06).The scores of UCLA PTSD-RI subscales were positively correlated with the scores of DASS-21subscales (r=0.52-0.70,Ps<0.001).The Cronbach' s α coefficient and the split-half reliability coefficient of UCLA PTSD-RI were 0.90 and 0.87,respectively.Conclusion:The Chinese Version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-IV (Revision 1,Children version) could be an effective instrument for assessing and diagnosing PTSD of Chinese children after disasters. |
|
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2018,32(2):160-165 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.02.013
|
|
关键词
|
加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(儿童修订版)
;
儿童
;
创伤后应激障碍
;
效度
;
信度
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100039
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;神经病学与精神病学 |
|
基金
|
灾后中国儿童心理创伤资助
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6161761
|
参考文献 共
26
共2页
|
|
1.
Steinberg A M. The University of California at Los Angeles Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index.
Curr Psychiatry Rep,2004,6(2):96-100
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Wamser-Nanney R. Characteristics of attrition among children receiving trauma-focused treatment.
Psychol Trauma,2016,8(6):745-754
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Willard V W. Life stress versus traumatic stress:the impact of life events on psychological functioning in children with and without serious illness.
Psychol Trauma,2016,8(1):63-71
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Edinburgh L. Assessing exploitation experiences of girls and boys seen at a child advocacy center.
Child Abuse Neglect,2015,46:47-59
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Shoshani A. The resilience function of character strengths in the face of war and protracted conflict.
Front Psychol,2006,2015:6
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Goenjian A K. Longitudinal study of PTSD,depression,and quality of life among adolescents after the Parnitha earthquake.
J Affect Disord,2011,133(3):509-515
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Contractor A A. Relations between PTSD and distress dimensions in an Indian child/adolescent sample following the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks.
J Abnorm Child Psychol,2014,42(6):925-935
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Namazi S. Validation of the Iranian version of the University of California at Los Angeles Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Index for DSM-IV-R.
Trauma Mon,2013,18(3):122-125
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Murray L K. Validation of the UCLAchild posttraumatic stress disorder reaction index in Zambia.
Int JMent Health Syst,2011,5(1):24
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Shen A C. Long-term effects of interparental violence and child physical maltreatment experiences on PTSD and behavior problems:a national survey of Taiwanese college students.
Child Abuse Negl,2009,33(3):148-160
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Hsieh Y P. Associations between child maltreatment,PTSD,and internet addiction among Taiwanese students.
Comput Hum Behav,2016,56(3):209-214
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Chou C Y. Child physical abuse and the related PTSD in Taiwan:the role of Chinese cultural background and victims' subjective reactions.
Child Abuse Negl,2011,35(1):58-68
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Liu S T. A community study on the relationship of posttraumatic cognitions to internalizing and externalizing psychopathology in Taiwanese children and adolescents.
J Abnorm Child Psychol,2015,43(8):1475-1484
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Fu C. An examination of resilience cross-culturally in child and adolescent survivors of the 2008 China earthquake using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).
J Affect Disord,2014,155(1):149-153
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
赵品良. 玉树震后半年灾区小学生的创伤后应激障碍及抑郁症状评估.
中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(6):787-789
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
文艺. 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表中文精简版信度及效度评价.
中国公共卫生,2012,28(11):1436-1438
|
CSCD被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
龚栩. 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告.
中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(4):443-446
|
CSCD被引
106
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
刘文俐. 抑郁、焦虑、压力与青少年情绪性进食的关系:自我控制的中介作用.
中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(5):841-843
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Steinberg A M. Psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction index:part I.
J Trauma Stress,2013,26(1):1-9
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Ellis B H. Screening for PTSD among Somali adolescent refugees:psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD Index.
J Trauma Stress,2006,19(4):547-551
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问