1985-2015年中国省际人口迁移网络特征
Spatial characteristics of China's interprovincial migration network during 1985-2015
查看参考文献34篇
文摘
|
随着中国城市经济的发展以及城镇化的快速推进,人口迁移的空间格局发生了重大变化。本文基于1985-2015年全国省际人口迁移矩阵数据,运用社会网络分析方法,探讨中国省际人口迁移网络的整体特征以及每个节点在网络中的地位作用。研究结论为:①省际人口迁移网络密度经历了1985-2000年的缓慢下降、2000-2015年持续上升的过程,与西北、西南和中部主要人口迁出地向东部经济发达地区的集中性迁移成为发展主流密切相关。 ②人口迁移网络的内向中心势明显大于外向中心势,说明人口迁入地相对集中,人口迁出地相对分散。③省际人口迁移网络可分为东北—华北人口联动区、中原—长三角人口联动区、中南—华南人口联动区、西南人口联动区、西北人口联动区5个子群。其中,中原—长三角人口联动区是群内和群间联系最紧密的区域;中南—华南人口联动区是全国人口累计迁移量最高的区域;东北—华北人口联动区内部联系较强,对外仅与西北人口联动区联系较强。④基于中心性分析以及核心—边缘结构划分,各省(市、区)对于人口迁移网络的贡献意义不同,广东、北京具有全局控制意义,江苏、陕西、四川、浙江基本处于核心节点序列,上海、天津、内蒙古、福建核心作用逐渐增强,河南、湖北、河北、新疆核心作用出现下降,全国人口迁移路径总体向北偏移。 |
其他语种文摘
|
With the rapid development of urban economy and the promotion of urbanization, great changes have taken place in the spatial pattern of population migration in China. Migration has played an important role in the economic, social, and cultural development of cities. Based on the provincial population migration matrix data of 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in 1985-2015, a social network analysis was conducted to investigate the overall characteristics of interprovincial population migration network and the role of each node. The results show that: (1) Network density of interprovincial population migration has experienced a slow decline in 1985-2000 and a continuous increase in 2000-2015. The concentrated migration of population from the northwest, southwest, and central regions to the eastern developed areas has become the mainstream of development. (2) The inward center potential of population migration network rapidly increased in 1985-2005 and gradually declined in 2005-2015. It indicates that the number of important population moving areas were increasing gradually (such as Tianjin and Fujian), towards a "multi-polarization" development. The outward center potential was always at a low level and exhibited a trend of fluctuation. The inward center potential was clearly larger than the outward center potential. It indicates that the population migration area is relatively concentrated, and the population emigration area is relatively dispersed. (3) The interprovincial population migration network can be divided into 5 groups: Northeast-North China population linkage area, Central Plains-Yangtze River Delta population linkage area, Middle South-Pearl River Delta population linkage area, southwest population linkage area, and northwest population linkage area. Among them, the Central Plains-Yangtze River Delta population linkage area was the most closely linked between and within group; Middle South-Pearl River Delta population linkage area had the highest total population migration. The Northeast-North China population linkage area had a stronger internal connection and only strongly linked with the northwest region externally. (4) According to the population migration analysis, the 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities can be divided into three major categories: net population migration areas including eight provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Beijing, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Tianjin, Fujian, and Xinjiang); population balanced areas including six provinces and autonomous regions (Hainan, Inner Mongolia, Tibet, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Liaoning), and population net emigration areas including 17 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities including Sichuan, Henan, and so on. (5) Based on the centrality analysis and the core-periphery structure, contributions of the provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities to population migration was very different. In the interprovincial population migration network, a few core nodes had strong control over the total amount and path of population migration. About 25-30% core provinces controlled 70-80% of the population migration and path of the country, and the control power continued to rise. Among these provinces, Guangdong and Beijing had overall control significance. Jiangsu, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Zhejiang were largely among the core control nodes. The role of Shanghai, Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, and Fujian as core areas had gradually increased. The role of Henan, Hubei, Hebei, and Xinjiang as core areas had declined. The overall migration path of the country is northward. |
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2017,36(11):1368-1379 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.11.006
|
关键词
|
省际人口迁移
;
社会网络分析
;
网络特征
;
中国
|
地址
|
1.
广东财经大学公共管理学院, 广州, 510320
2.
江西环境工程职业学院科研处, 江西, 赣州, 341002
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
基金
|
广东省哲学社会科学规划项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
;
广东省教育厅青年创新人才类项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6121001
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
1.
丁金宏. 中国人口迁移的区域差异与流场特征.
地理学报,2005,60(1):106-114
|
CSCD被引
50
次
|
|
|
|
2.
董上. 中国省际人口迁移的复杂网络研究.
南方人口,2014,29(2):54-61
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
3.
段成荣. 影响我国省际人口迁移的个人特征分析: 兼论"时间"因素在人口迁移研究中的重要性.
人口研究,2000,24(4):14-22
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
4.
胡小武. 人口"就近城镇化": 人口迁移新方向.
西北人口,2011,32(1):1-5
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
5.
李德辉. 关于人口迁移规律的初探: 人口迁移的历史回顾、目前状况及未来趋势.
人口学刊,1981(2):41-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
李扬. 1985-2010年中国省际人口迁移时空格局特征.
地理研究,2015,34(6):1135-1148
|
CSCD被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
7.
刘望保. 中国省际人口迁移流场及其空间差异.
经济地理,2012,32(2):8-13
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
8.
刘晏伶. 中国人口迁移特征及其影响因素: 基于第六次人口普查数据的分析.
人文地理,2014,29(2):129-137
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
9.
刘颖. 基于综合城镇化视角的省际人口迁移格局空间分析.
地理科学,2017,37(8):1151-1158
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
10.
逯进. 中国省域人口迁移与经济增长耦合关系的演进.
人口研究,2014,38(6):40-56
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
11.
马侠. 中国城镇人口迁移与城镇化研究:中国74城镇人口迁移调查.
人口研究,1988,12(2):1-7
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
蒲英霞. 中国省际人口迁移的多边效应机制分析.
地理学报,2016,26(2):205-216
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
13.
唐家龙. 论时变性因素对人口迁移选择性的影响: 基于数据处理方法的视角.
中国人口科学,2008(2):65-71,96
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
王桂新. 不同地域层次间人口迁移问题的研究: 根据中间地域层次小城镇角度分析.
西北人口,1989(2):30-37
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
王桂新. 中国省际人口迁移区域模式变化及其影响因素:基于2000和2010年人口普查资料的分析.
中国人口科学,2012(5):2-13,111
|
CSCD被引
40
次
|
|
|
|
16.
王珏. 基于社会网络分析的长三角地区人口迁移及演化.
地理研究,2014,33(2):385-400
|
CSCD被引
45
次
|
|
|
|
17.
杨传开. 中国省际人口迁移格局演变及其对城镇化发展的影响.
地理研究,2015,34(8):1492-1506
|
CSCD被引
51
次
|
|
|
|
18.
杨义武. 地方公共品供给与人口迁移: 来自地级及以上城市的经验证据.
中国人口科学,2017(2):93-103,128
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
19.
臧玉珠. 1995-2010年中国省际人口迁移态势与空间格局演变:基于社会网络分析的视角.
人文地理,2016,31(4):112-118
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
20.
钟奕纯. 城市迁移人口居住空间分异-对深圳市的实证研究.
地理科学进展,2017,36(1):125-135
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|