基于Bootstrap-DEA模型环渤海地区海洋经济效率空间演化与影响因素分析
Spatial Evolution of Marine Economic Efficiency and Its Influential Factors in Bohai Sea Ring Area Based on Bootstrap-DEA Model
查看参考文献34篇
文摘
|
借助Bootstrap-DEA模型综合测算了环渤海地区17个城市海洋经济效率,并结合标准差椭圆和重心坐标方法,定量刻画了2000~2012年环渤海地区海洋经济效率空间格局演化特征,考察了影响空间格局演化的重要因素及其影响机制。结果表明:①基于Bootstrap-DEA模型纠偏后的海洋经济效率更低,但准确性更高;计算得到的环渤海地区海洋经济效率总体上且呈现先上升后下降的趋势,低海洋经济效率的城市主要分布于渤海西南沿岸。②从标准差椭圆分布来看,海洋经济效率总体呈现南(偏西)-北(偏东)的空间格局;从重心的移动轨迹来看,效率重心先向渤海西南部海洋经济区移动,再转向辽东半岛海洋经济区与渤海西部海洋经济区移动,最后转向山东半岛蓝色经济区移动。③针对海洋经济效率空间格局演化驱动机制的分析表明,区位优势对海洋经济效率产生正向影响,海洋产业结构和外商直接投资对海洋经济效率产生负向影响,资源消耗型海洋产业比重过大是导致海洋经济效率下降的主要原因。 |
其他语种文摘
|
By using Bootstrap-DEA model, this article first comprehensively measures and calculates the marine economic efficiency of 17 coastal cities in Bohai Sea Ring Area. Then Standard Deviation Ellipses and Barycentric Coordinates Method are applied to projecting and visualizing the evolution of spatial pattern of marine economic efficiency in Bohai Sea Ring Area from 2000 to 2012. Finally, we analyze the important factors which affect the evolution of spatial pattern and its mechanisms. Results are shown as follows: 1) Compared with the traditional DEA model, marine economic efficiency modified by Bootstrap-DEA model is lower but higher accuracy. Overall, marine economic efficiency in all the cities show a trend which first upwards and then downwards, and the cities with low marine economic efficiency are mainly located in northwestern BSRA. 2) Viewed from rotation angle of the Standard Deviational Ellipses, marine economic efficiency generally present a North (by east)-South (by west) spatial distribution pattern. Viewed from the track of the center of gravity, the center of gravity of marine economic efficiency first moves to Bohai Sea Southwest Marine Economic Zone, and then turns to Liaodong Peninsula Marine Economic Zone and Bohai Sea Western Marine Economic Zone, finally moves to Shandong Peninsula Blue Economic Zone. 3) By analyzing the evolution driving mechanism of spatial pattern of marine economic efficiency, we can find out that location advantages have positive impacts on the marine economic efficiency, while the marine industrial structure and FDI have a negative effect on marine economic efficiency. A large proportion of resource consuming marine industry is the main reason to reduce marine economic efficiency. |
来源
|
地理科学
,2017,37(6):859-867 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.06.007
|
关键词
|
Bootstrap-DEA
;
海洋经济效率
;
空间演化
;
环渤海地区
|
地址
|
1.
辽宁师范大学海洋经济与可持续发展研究中心, 辽宁, 大连, 116029
2.
华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院, 上海, 200062
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6015781
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
1.
狄乾斌. 熵视角下的中国海洋生态系统可持续发展能力分析.
地理科学,2014,34(6):664-671
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
2.
孙才志. 基于WSBM模型的环渤海地区海洋经济脆弱性研究.
地理科学,2016,36(5):705-714
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Bichou K. An empirical study of the impacts of operating and market conditions on container-port efficiency and benchmarking.
Research in Transportation Economics,2013,42(1):28-37
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Cullinane K. The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis.
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2006,40(4):354-374
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Tingley D. Factors affecting technical efficiency in fisheries: stochastic production frontier versus data envelopment analysis approaches.
Fisheries Research,2005,73(3):363-376
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Maravelias C D. Economic efficiency analysis and fleet capacity assessment in Mediterranean fisheries.
Fisheries Research,2008,93(1):85-91
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
7.
赵林. 基于SBM和Malmquist生产率指数的中国海洋经济效率评价研究.
资源科学,2016,38(3):461-475
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
8.
赵林. 考虑非期望产出的中国省际海洋经济效率测度及时空特征.
地理科学,2016,36(5):671-680
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
9.
吴淑娟. 我国海洋经济运作效率的测量--基于混合型网络DEA模型.
科技管理研究,2015,35(10):64-68
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
詹长根. 沿海地区海洋经济效率及驱动机理研究.
工业技术经济,35(7):51-58
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
范斐. 环渤海经济圈沿海城市海洋经济效率的实证研究.
统计与决策,2011,6:119-123
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
苑清敏. 资源环境约束下我国海洋经济效率变化及生产效率变化分析.
经济经纬,2016,3:13-18
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Simar L. Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art.
Journal of Productivity Analysis,2000,13(1):49-78
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
14.
孙才志. 环渤海地区海域承载力测度与时空分异分析.
地理科学,2014,34(5):513-521
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Wei Quanling. Effective methods on evaluating relative efficiency (DEA).
Chinese Science Bulletin,2000,45(17):1793-1807
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Song M L. Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS' energy efficiency based on small sample data.
Applied Energy,2013,112:1049-1055
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Simar L. Of course we can bootstrap DEA scores! But does it mean anything? Logic trumps wishful thinking.
Journal of Productivity Analysis,1999,11(1):93-97
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Simar L. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models.
Management Science,1998,44(1):49-61
|
CSCD被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Hall P. On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval.
The Annals of Statistics,1986,14(4):1453-1462
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Wong D W S. Several fundamentals in implementing spatial statistics in GIS: Using centrographic measures as examples.
Geographic Information Sciences,1999,5(2):163-174
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|