基于非期望产出的城市发展效率时空差异探讨——以中国东部沿海地区城市为例
Spatial and Temporal Disparities of Urban Development Efficiency of Coastal Cities in China Based on Undesirable Outputs
查看参考文献34篇
|
文摘
|
基于非期望产出视角,采用SBM模型测度2005~2014年中国东部沿海地区53个城市(不包括港、澳、台、三沙市)的城市发展效率,并分析其时空差异特征及其影响因素。结果表明:①考虑非期望产出的城市发展效率值低于不考虑非期望产出的城市发展效率值,并且更符合城市实际发展;②中国东部沿海地区城市发展效率整体水平不高,波动幅度大,阶段特征明显,整体呈先上升后下降的趋势;③在时空分析特征中,城市发展效率的区域差异明显,近2 a有缩小的趋势;整体城市发展效率空间呈现“北部围绕青岛市,中部围绕上海市,南部围绕深圳市"的发展格局;④在影响因素分析中,经济规模对城市发展效率产生正向影响,第二产业结构水平和污染处理能力对城市发展效率产生负向影响,传统的加工制造业、高耗能重污染工业和污染处理不到位是导致城市发展效率降低的主要原因。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
We can grasp the distribution of resources, utilization efficiency and propulsion paths in the process of urbanization in China's coastal areas by measuring the urban development efficiency, which can provide references for policy and experience for sustainable development. This article is based on the viewpoint of undesirable output, measuring the urban development efficiency of 53 coastal cities in China (excluding Hong Kong,Macao, Taiwan and Sansha) during 2005 to 2014 with the SBM model, and analyzing its spatial-temporal disparities and affecting factors. The main results are summarized as follows: 1) The urban development efficiency value taking consideration of undesirable output is lower than the one without consideration of undesirable output, which turns out that undesirable output has a significant effect on urban development efficiency and the development efficiency value considered it matches the actual situation of urban development better. 2) The urban development efficiency of the coastal cities is not high on the whole,it fluctuates widely and has obvious characteristic of stages, which shows a trend of rising in the first and declining then as a whole. During 2005 to 2008, the percentage of the cities with highest development efficiency increased from 15.09% to 28.30%,and the percentage of the cities with medium efficiency increased from 7.55% to 28.3%; While in 2011,the two percentages mentioned above declined to 18.87% and 22.64%,and in 2014,they went a step further in declining, there were only 9.43% of the cities with highest development efficiency and 11.32% with medium development efficiency. 3) The spatial disparity of urban development is significant though in a trend of shrinking recent two years. on the whole,the urban development efficiency presents a development pattern of' surrounding Qingdao in the north, surrounding Shanghai in the middle and surrounding Shenzhen in the south". Which means that Qingdao, Shanghai and Shenzhen has become the three poles in aspect of urban development efficiency. 4) The level of second industry structure and ability of pollution treatment have negative impacts on urban development efficiency, while the scale of economy has a positive impact on the efficiency of urban development. The main reasons leading to lower urban development efficiency contain traditional processing and manufacturing industry, high energy consumption, heavy pollution industry and inadequate pollution treatment. Finally, the suggestions to improve urban development efficiency for coastal cities are as follow:In order to upgrade industries, the investment of human, capital and resources should be reasonable. We can not neglect the effect of undesirable output when measuring the urban development efficiency, and we should pay more attention to environment protection and pollution treatment. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2017,37(6):807-816 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.06.001
|
|
关键词
|
城市发展效率
;
非期望产出
;
时空格局
;
沿海城市
|
|
地址
|
辽宁师范大学海洋经济与可持续发展研究中心, 辽宁, 大连, 116029
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
辽宁省高等学校优秀科技人才支持计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6015775
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
|
1.
Habitat U N.
A decade of United Nations support to broad-based participatory management of urban development, me 1990-2000,2001
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Su W. Measuring the impact of urban sprawl on natural landscape pattern of the Western Taihu Lake watershed,China.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2010,95(1):61-67
|
CSCD被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
王建康. 中国新型城镇化的空间格局演变及影响因素分析——基于285个地级市的面板数据.
地理科学,2016,26(1):63-71
|
CSCD被引
50
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
刘刚. 中国重化工业发展的空间组织形态演化.
经济问题,2012,4:40-44,84
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
朱巧娴. 基于碳排放测算的湖北省土地利用结构效率的DEA模型分析与空间分异研究.
经济地理,2015,35(12):176-184
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
张荣天. 泛长三角城市土地利用效益测度及时空格局演化.
地理与地理信息科学,2014,30(6):75-81
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
郭腾云. 基于DEA的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化.
地理学报,2009,64(4):408-416
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
潘竞虎. 中国地级及以上城市发展效率差异的DEA-ESDA测度.
经济地理,2012,32(12):53-60
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
李瑞. 环渤海地区城市旅游业发展效率时空特征及其演化阶段——以三大城市群为例.
地理科学进展,2014,33(6):773-785
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
方创琳. 中国城市群投入产出效率的综合测度与空间分异.
地理学报,2011,66(8):1011-1022
|
CSCD被引
68
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
陈修颖. 浙江省科技资源的区域差异及其空间配置效率研究.
地理科学,2012,22(24):418-425
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
李红锦. 基于DEA模型的城市群效率研究-珠三角城市群的实证研究.
软科学,2011,25(5):91-95
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Zhuoma G R. Study on intercity differences of Chinese urban economic efficiency and its spatial-temporal characteristics: base on 273 citis at prefecture lever or above in China.
Advabced Materials Research,2014,962:2185-2190
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Guo T Y. Metropolitan resources efficiencies, changge trends and causes in China under the goal to build an in-ternational metropolis.
Journal of Geographical Sciences,2011,4:746-756
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Cobb C W. A theory of production.
American-Economic Review,1928,18(1):139-165
|
CSCD被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis.
European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509
|
CSCD被引
573
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
关伟. 中国能源生态效率的空间格局与空间效应.
地理学报,2015,70(6):980-992
|
CSCD被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
赵良仕. 中国省际水资源利用效率与空间溢出效应测度.
地理学报,2014,69(1):121-133
|
CSCD被引
58
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
王宝义. 中国农业生态效率测度及时空差异研究.
中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(6):11-19
|
CSCD被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
潘丹. 中国农业生态效率评价方法与实证--基于非期望产出的SBM模型分析.
生态学报,2013,33(12):3837-3845
|
CSCD被引
89
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问