帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析
Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area

查看参考文献24篇

文摘 近年来北京市建成区扩张迅速,对城市周边地区的生态系统服务需求上升。本文以北京市生态涵养区为例,利用能值评估方法评估该区域生态系统服务,分析各生态系统及其与城市系统之间的服务流动和依赖关系。研究结果表明:从生态系统类型上看,2012年森林生态系统服务对涵养区生态系统服务贡献最大,占到生态系统服务总能值的79.7%,其次为农田和水域生态系统,分别占总能值的19.7%和0.6%;从生态系统服务类型上看,森林生态系统的有机物生产和水源涵养是其主要的生态系统服务,分别占总能值产出的40.4%和35.8%。粮食供给是农田系统的主要能值输出,占农田生态系统能值的70%。水域提供的生态系统服务中,能值比例较高的依次为水源供给、洪水调蓄和水产品供给,分别占水域生态系统能值的35.1%、28.6%和28.2%;从能值转移矩阵分析可以看出,对城市来说,森林生物量、森林土壤水、水域地下水和农田生物量是重要的生态系统服务供给组分;系统能值动态分析结果表明,2004年到2012年森林和水域生态系统重要程度增加,农田生态系统重要程度有所减少,城市系统的角色由主动变为被动。因此,在未来的发展规划中,对森林和水域生态系统的保育应给予足够关注。
其他语种文摘 Beijing, as the political, communicational, cultural, and technological center of China, has been experiencing rapid urban expansion in recent years. This fast urbanization resulted in greater demands for ecosystem services from peri- urban ecosystems. Based on emergy analysis and using impact matrix, this study took the urban ecological conservation area (ECA) of Beijing as an example to evaluate the ecosystem services flows and the level of dependence between natural and urban systems. In terms of ecosystem types, results show that forest ecosystem contributes the most to ecosystem service provision in ECA, which represents 79.7% of total ecosystem services emergy in 2012. Meanwhile, cropland and aquatic ecosystems account for 19.7% and 0.6%, respectively. From the perspective of ecosystem services types, biomass production and water retention are the two dominative service types provided by forest ecosystem, accounting for 40.4% and 35.8% of forest ecosystem services emergy respectively. Food supply is the most significant emergy component in cropland ecosystem, which represents 70% of cropland ecosystem service emergy. Water supply, flood storage and aquatic product supply are the three most important emergy components in aquatic ecosystem, which account for 35.1%,28.6% and 28.2% of the total aquatic emergy respectively. Results of emergy impact matrix suggest that forest biomass, soil water, groundwater and cropland biomass are the four vital providers of ecosystem services to urban system. At the temporal scale, results demonstrated that forest and aquatic ecosystems played more and more significant roles in water retention and water supply while cropland ecosystems became less and less important in food supply from 2004 to 2012. Urban system also transformed from a positive influencing to a passive receiving factor of ecosystem services in this period. Accordingly, more attention should be paid to conservation of forest and aquatic ecosystems in future urban planning in order to achieve better ecosystem service provision.
来源 地理学报 ,2017,72(6):974-985 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201706003
关键词 生态系统服务 ; 能值分析 ; 生态涵养区 ; 北京市
地址

北京大学城市与环境学院土地科学中心, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京, 100871

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
基金 国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6015362

参考文献 共 24 共2页

1.  Zasada I. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy,2011,28(4):639-648 CSCD被引 26 次    
2.  Aubry C. Urban agriculture and land use in cities: An approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Policy,2012,29(2):429-439 CSCD被引 22 次    
3.  Temple L. The functions and constraints of peri-urban agriculture of several African cities (Yaounde, Cotonou, Dakar). Cahiers Agricultures,2004,13:15-22 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Haase D. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007,80(1):1-13 CSCD被引 10 次    
5.  Kenyon W. Scoping the role of agriculture in sustainable flood management. Land Use Policy,2008,25(3):351-360 CSCD被引 2 次    
6.  Wheater H. Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy,2009,26(Suppl.l):S251-S264 CSCD被引 11 次    
7.  Lamptey B L. Impacts of agriculture and urbanization on the climate of the Northeastern United States. Global and Planetary Change,2005,49:203-221 CSCD被引 7 次    
8.  Hutchinson J J. Some perspectives on carbon sequestration in agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2007,142:288-302 CSCD被引 25 次    
9.  Davoudi S. Urban-rural relationships: An introduction and brief history. Built Environment,2002,28(4):269-277 CSCD被引 5 次    
10.  Ba A. Perception of proximity agriculture by the residents of Dakar. Journal of Regional & Urban Economy,2010(5):913-936 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Sullivan W C. Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural-urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,77:152-166 CSCD被引 5 次    
12.  Ulo Mander. Multifunctional Land Use,2007:93-104 CSCD被引 1 次    
13.  Overbeek G. Opportunities for rural-urban relationships to enhance the rural landscape. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,2009,11(1):61-68 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Huang S L. Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity,2011,8(1):38-50 CSCD被引 9 次    
15.  谢花林. 北京山区景观功能评价 --以北京市怀柔区为例. 山地学报,2004,22(6):756-761 CSCD被引 4 次    
16.  黄姣. 基于生态系统服务区的城市周边地区土地利用管理:以北京为例的探索研究,2012 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  李云燕. 北京市生态涵养区生态补偿机制的实施途径与政策措施. 中央财经大学学报,2011,7(12):75-80 CSCD被引 5 次    
18.  Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems,1997 CSCD被引 39 次    
19.  汤萃文. 基于能值理论的东祁连山森林生态系统服务功能价值评价. 生态学杂志,2012,31(2):433-439 CSCD被引 13 次    
20.  马凤娇. 基于能值分析的农田生态系统服务评估——以河北省栾城县为例. 资源科学,2014,36(9):1949-1957 CSCD被引 13 次    
引证文献 18 篇

1 王伟伟 禁牧政策对宁夏盐池县农业生态系统服务影响的能值分析 生态学报,2019,39(1):146-157
CSCD被引 5 次

2 赵筱青 典型高原湖泊流域生态安全格局构建——以杞麓湖流域为例 中国环境科学,2019,39(2):768-777
CSCD被引 29 次

显示所有18篇文献

论文科学数据集

1. 国家生态屏障区产水服务量1-km栅格逐年数据集（2000-2015）

2. 国家生态屏障区1-km分辨率土壤保持逐年数据集（2000-2015）

数据来源：
国家对地观测科学数据中心
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号