中国情境下团队伦理决策的过程机制及影响因素
The process and antecedents of team ethical decision-making: A study in Chinese context
查看参考文献64篇
|
文摘
|
尽管绝大多数商业伦理决策都是由团队而非个人所做出的, 但目前对团队伦理决策的研究还很少, 尤其缺乏基于理论的深入研究。在前人研究的基础上, 借鉴个体伦理决策和团队决策方面的研究成果, 结合中国文化强调反省、中庸、威权领导等特点, 我们对团队伦理决策的过程机制及影响因素的作用模式展开理论驱动的深入研究。具体来讲, 将综合利用多种方法来进行两个方面的4项子研究。在团队伦理决策的过程机制方面, 拟开展团队伦理决策的过程机制模型构建研究, 然后聚焦于团队伦理决策和个体伦理决策的核心区别, 展开基于社会决策图式理论的团队伦理决策观点整合机制研究; 在团队伦理决策的影响因素作用模式方面, 拟从成员和领导两个方面来进行:基于信息加工和团队冲突的成员多样性对团队伦理决策的影响机制研究, 基于信息取样模型的领导特征对团队伦理决策的影响机制研究。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Although most business ethical decisions are made by teams rather than individuals, only a few studies have focused on team ethical decision making, which remain on comparing the results of individual and team ethical decision-making directly without much aid of theories. Based on studies of individual ethical decision-making, group decision-making, and Chinese cultural characteristics (reflection, zhongyong, authoritarian leadership, et al.), we intend to explore the mechanism of team ethical decision making process and the effect pattern of its antecedents. Specifically, it will include four sub-studies in two aspects via multiple methods. First, a process mechanism model is developed to look at the mechanism of team ethical decision-making process. Second, based on social decision scheme theory, an opinion integration mechanism is set up to integrate the opinions out of team ethical decision-making when focusing on the core differences between team and individual ethical decision-making. The other two are about member and leadership with regard to the effect pattern of antecedents: to study the mechanism of how member diversity influences team ethical decision-making via information processing and team conflict; to study the mechanism of how leadership features affects team ethical decision-making by information sampling model. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2017,25(4):542-552 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00542
|
|
关键词
|
团队伦理决策
;
社会决策图式
;
团队多样性
;
信息取样模型
;
伦理领导
|
|
地址
|
1.
江西财经大学工商管理学院, 南昌, 330013
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5962026
|
参考文献 共
64
共4页
|
|
1.
陈婷. 团队决策中的共享信息偏差:基于隐藏文档范式的机制、影响因素探究.
心理科学进展,2016,24:132-142
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈文平. 员工为什么不建言:基于中国文化视角的解析.
心理科学进展,2013,21:905-913
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
何贵兵. 个人影响力在群体决策整合过程中的作用:对SDS理论的扩展.
心理学报,2004,36:37-43
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
蒋丽. 团队决策及其影响因素.
心理科学进展,2007,15:358-365
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
李锐. 主管威权领导与下属前瞻行为:一个被中介的调节模型构建与检验.
心理学报,2014,46:1719-1733
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
梁建. 道德领导与员工建言:一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验.
心理学报,2014,46:252-264
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
朱熹.
四书章句集注,2011
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Abdolmohammadi M J. Ethical cognition of business students individually and in groups.
Journal of Business Ethics,1997,16:1717-1725
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Abdolmohammadi M J. Does group reasoning improve ethical reasoning?.
Business and Society Review,2003,108:127-137
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50:179-211
|
CSCD被引
578
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ashforth B E. Normalizing emotion in organizations:Making the extraordinary seem ordinary.
Human Resource Management Review,2002,12:215-235
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Baker T L. An exploratory investigation into the effects of team composition on moral orientation.
Journal of Managerial Issues,2003,15:106-119
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Baumann M R. Member awareness of expertise, information sharing, information weighting, and group decision making.
Small Group Research,2013,44:532-562
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Brief A P. Collective corruption in the corporate world:Toward a process model.
Groups at work:Theory and research,2001:471-499
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Brown M E. Ethical leadership:A review and future directions.
The Leadership Quarterly,2006,17:595-616
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Brown M E. Ethical leadership:A social learning perspective for construct development and testing.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2005,97:117-134
|
CSCD被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Chan A. Ethical beliefs of chinese consumers in Hong Kong.
Journal of Business Ethics,1998,17:1163-1170
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Chen X P. Affective trust in Chinese leaders:Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance.
Journal of Management,2014,40:796-819
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Cheung T S. On Zhongyong rationality:The confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality.
Asian Journal of Social Science,2003,31:107-127
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Clark K D. The influence of decision frames and vision priming on decision outcomes in work groups:Motivating stakeholder considerations.
Journal of Business Ethics,2014,120:27-38
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问