大学生依恋类型、亲密关系满意度与抑郁的关系研究
Relationship between Attachment Styles,Satisfaction Degree of Intimate Relationships and Depression of College Students
查看参考文献20篇
|
文摘
|
目的探讨大学生依恋类型、亲密关系满意度与抑郁的关系。方法于2015年3-5月,采用方便抽样法,在上海市某3所高校抽取恋爱中的男女大学生180对。采用问卷调查的方式,招募恋爱中的男女大学生报名参加,共发放问卷360份(180对),回收有效问卷336份(168对),有效回收率为93.3%。采用修订的亲密关系体验量表简版(ECR-R)测量依恋类型;采用感知亲密关系质量量表(PRQC)测量亲密关系满意度;采用流调中心用抑郁量表(CES-D)测量抑郁。不同计量资料间的相关性分析采用Pearson相关分析;影响因素分析采用一元线性回归分析。结果男生依恋焦虑、依恋回避、亲密关系满意度、抑郁得分分别为(2.5±0.7)、(2.1±0.6)、(5.8±0.9)、(1.6±0.4)分,女生分别为(2.6±0.7)、(2.3±0.6)、(5.6±1.0)、(1.6±0.4)分。男生依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分与自身亲密关系满意度得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分与自身抑郁得分呈直线正相关(P<0.05),亲密关系满意度得分与自身抑郁得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05)。女生依恋回避得分与亲密关系满意度得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分与自身抑郁得分呈直线正相关(P<0.05),亲密关系满意度得分与自身抑郁得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05)。男生依恋回避得分与女生亲密关系满意度得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分与女生抑郁得分呈直线正相关(P<0.05)。女生依恋回避得分与男生亲密关系满意度得分呈直线负相关(P<0.05),女生依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分与男生抑郁得分呈直线正相关(P<0.05)。一元线性回归分析结果显示,男生依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分是自身亲密关系满意度、抑郁得分的影响因素(P<0.05);女生依恋回避得分是自身亲密关系满意度的影响因素(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分是自身抑郁得分的影响因素(P<0.05);男生依恋回避得分是女生亲密关系满意度得分的影响因素(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分是女生抑郁得分的影响因素(P<0.05);女生依恋回避得分是男生亲密关系满意度得分的影响因素(P<0.05),依恋焦虑、依恋回避得分是男生抑郁得分的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论安全的依恋类型不仅可以减少个体自身抑郁程度,还可提高恋人的亲密关系满意度、降低对方的抑郁水平。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To explore the relationship between attachment styles,satisfaction degree of intimate relationship and depression of college students.Methods 180 pairs of male and female college students who were in love were selected from 3 universities of Shanghai from March to May in 2015 by convenience sampling method.By questionnaire survey,male and female college students in love were recruited to enroll in the investigation,a total of 360 questionnaires were sent out(180 pairs),336 were valid questionnaires(168 pairs),and the effective response rate was 93.3%.The revised simple version of Experiences in Close Relationship Scale(ECR),Perceived Relationship Quality Components Scale(PRQC) and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D) were adopted to measure the attachment styles,satisfaction degree of intimate relationships and depression respectively.Pearson correlation analysis was used in correlation analysis between different measurement data;unitary linear regression analysis was applied in analyzing influencing factors.Results The scores of boys in attachment anxiety,attachment avoidance,intimacy satisfaction degree,depression scores were(2.5±0.7),(2.1±0.6),(5.8±0.9),and(1.6±0.4) respectively,while the scores of girls in the above aspects were(2.6±0.7),(2.3±0.6),(5.6±1.0),(1.6±0.4) respectively.There was a linearly negative correlation between boys' scores of attachment anxiety,attachment avoidance and satisfaction scores of their own intimate relationships(P<0.05),a linear positive correlation was found in attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance scores and their own depression scores(P<0.05),and there was a linearly negative correlation between satisfaction scores of intimate relationship and their own depression scores(P<0.05).There was a linearly negative correlation between girls' scores of attachment avoidance and satisfaction scores of intimate relationships(P<0.05),a linear positive correlation was found in attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance scores and their own depression scores(P<0.05),and there was a linearly negative correlation between satisfaction scores of intimate relationship and their own depression scores(P<0.05).There was a linearly negative correlation between boys' scores of attachment avoidance and girls' satisfaction scores of intimate relationship(P<0.05),and there was a linearly positive correlation between attachment anxiety as well as attachment avoidance scores and depression scores of girls(P<0.05).There was a linearly negative correlation between girls' attachment avoidance scores and boys' satisfaction scores of intimate relationships(P<0.05),and there was a linearly positive correlation between attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance scores of girls and depression scores of boys(P<0.05).Unitary linear regression analysis showed that attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance scores of boys were influence factors of their own satisfaction scores of intimate relationships and depression scores(P<0.05);attachment avoidance scores of girls were influence factors of their own satisfaction scores of intimate relationships(P<0.05);scores of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance were influence factors of their own depression scores(P<0.05);boys' scores of attachment avoidance were influence factors of girls' satisfaction scores of intimate relationships(P<0.05),scores of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance were influence factors of depression scores of girls(P<0.05);girls' scores of attachment avoidance were influence factors of boys' satisfaction scores of intimate relationships(P<0.05),scores of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance were influence factors of depression scores of boys(P<0.05). Conclusion Secure attachment style can not only decrease individual depression degree,but also improve the satisfaction degree of their intimate relationships,and lower their partner's depression level. |
|
来源
|
中国全科医学
,2016,19(31):3850-3854 【扩展库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.31.019
|
|
关键词
|
学生
;
客体依恋
;
亲密关系满意度
;
抑郁
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-9572 |
|
学科
|
神经病学与精神病学 |
|
基金
|
国家科技基础性工作专项
;
中国科学院心理健康重点实验室经费支持
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5861367
|
参考文献 共
20
共1页
|
|
1.
李彤. 大学生抑郁状况及相关因素调查.
社会心理科学,2008,23(6):67-73
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
顾思梦. 大学生抑郁与成人依恋的关系:自尊的中介作用.
中国特殊教育,2015,22(9):64-70
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Bifulco A. Adult attachment style.I:its relationship to clinical depression.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2002,37(2):50-59
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Munley P H. Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development and vocational behavior.
Journal of Counseling Psychology,1975,22(4):314-319
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Wei M. The experiences in close relationship scale(ECR)-short form:reliability,validity,and factor structure.
J Pers Assess,2007,88(2):187-204
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Fletcher G J. The measurement of perceived relationship quality components:a confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26(3):340-354
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
汪向东.
心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999:202
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
孙良.
医科大学生焦虑、抑郁及相关因素的1年纵向研究,2013
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
余海军.
成人依恋、爱情表达与亲密关系满意度关系研究,2011
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Hammond J R. Attachment styles and relationship satisfaction in the development of close relationships.
New Zealand Journal of Psychology,1991,20(2):56-62
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Turker J S. Attachment style,interpersonal perception accuracy,and relationship satisfaction in dating couples.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1999,25(4):403-412
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
朱伟. 大学生成人依恋与抑郁的相关研究.
新乡学院学报(社会科学版),2011,25(1):30-31
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
李新民.
大学生成人依恋、自我表露与抑郁状态的关系研究,2009
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Vivona J M. Parental attachment styles of late adolescents:qualities of attachment relationships and consequences for adjustment.
Journal of Counseling Psychology,2000,47(3):316-329
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Muris P. Self-reported attachment style,attachment quality,and symptoms of anxiety and depression in young adolescents.
Personality & Individual Differences,2001,30(5):809-818
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
吴悦. 情侣依恋与个体抑郁的关系:冲突的中介作用.
中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(1):150-152
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Lyons-Ruth K. Attachment and psychopathology.
Infant Mental Health Journal,1998,19(4):451-453
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
汤芙蓉. 大学生成人依恋、社会支持与抑郁的关系.
心理发展与教育,2009,25(3):95-100
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
吴晓薇. 攻击性:关于感觉寻求和情绪调节自我效能感的可选模型.
中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(2):196-200
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Kane H S. Feeling supported and feeling satisfied:how one partner's attachment style predicts the other partner's relationship experiences.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2007,24(4):535-555
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问