帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

合肥地区平流层气溶胶地基激光雷达与SAGE卫星探测比较
Comparison of stratospheric aerosol derived from ground LiDAR and SAGE in Hefei

查看参考文献27篇

何文英 1   凌超 1 *   陈洪滨 1   胡顺星 2  
文摘 为了解中国上空SAGE反演的平流层气溶胶数据质量,将合肥地区地基激光雷达观测10年(1996年— 2005年)的气溶胶数据与SAGE资料进行比较。通过较为系统全面的比较分析,得到如下结果:(1)10—30 km内 SAGE与LiDAR分析的气溶胶变化趋势较为一致,出现峰值和低值的位置也较为接近;(2)SAGE结果普遍比 LiDAR测量的偏小,对应的平流层气溶胶AOD差异显著,定量表现为:激光雷达获取的平流层气溶胶AOD基本约为0.004,SAGE反演的平流层气溶胶AOD基本约为0.002,只有前者的一半;(3)两者分析的20—35 km气溶胶季节分布差异较小,再次表明平流层气溶胶比较稳定。
其他语种文摘 This study aims to assess the quality of retrieved stratospheric aerosol data from the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment(SAGE) in China. Data from 10-year observation of ground LiDAR in Hefei, China were comparedwith the corresponding SAGE aerosol dataset. This work focused on the 20—40 km aerosol extinction profile and AOD to elucidate stratospheric aerosol. Two methods were used to form matching pair for LiDAR and SAGE because of the limited observation samples in Hefei for SAGE limb detection. The first method is singe profile matching, which matches the observed aerosol profile within the same day with the temporal and 10° spatialdistancetoobtain approximately 24 matching pairs. The second method is multi-profile matching, which matches the aerosol profiles with the 10° spatial distance within a certain period, such as per season; subsequently, differences in the averaged profiles were compared among the four seasons. Comprehensive comparisons show that aerosol variation trends are consistent when derived from LiDAR and SAGE in 10—30km. The positions of peaks and valleys of the aerosol extinction profile are similar. In addition, aerosol seasonal differences in 20—35km from LiDAR and SAGE, respectively, are relatively smaller, which reflects the stability of stratospheric aerosol. However, the detailed value distribution shows that the SAGE results are generally smaller than those of LiDAR, and their corresponding AODs differ within 20—40km. The quantitative results show that the aerosol AOD within 20—40 km as observed by LiDAR is approximately 0.004; the corresponding results retrieved by SAGE is approximately 0.002, which is only half of the former. The evident differences in LiDAR and SAGE results for stratospheric aerosol AOD and their extinction profiles are mainly attributed to their different measurement and retrieval methods. Furthermore, large temporal and spatial scales are required to match the LiDAR and SAGE observations, which may cause uncertainties in the compared results because of different detection technologies employed. Moreover, the SAGE aerosol profile was retrieved from Mie scattering theory. By contrast, the LiDAR aerosol profile was calculated using Fernald method, which requires the adjustment of several important constants, such as back scattering ratio and reference height. Artificial choices for these constants increase the possibility of errors for LiDAR aerosol retrieval. Therefore, different and complex retrieval methods can increase bias in the compared results. Comparisons of aerosol within 20—40 km from SAGE and LiDAR in Hefei, China show that variation in stratospheric aerosol is generally reasonable as reflected by SAGE retrieval. The quantitative AOD value is systemically lower than half of that detected by ground LiDAR.
来源 遥感学报 ,2016,20(4):540-548 【核心库】
DOI 10.11834/jrs.20165130
关键词 平流层气溶胶 ; SAGE ; 地基激光雷达 ; 消光系数 ; 光学厚度
地址

1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 中国科学院中层大气和全球环境探测重点实验室, 北京, 100029  

2. 中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所, 安徽, 合肥, 230031

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1007-4619
学科 自动化技术、计算机技术
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划) ;  国家自然科学基金项目 ;  北京市自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:5750613

参考文献 共 27 共2页

1.  Antuna J C. Lidar validation of SAGE Ⅱ aerosol measurements after the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. Journal of Geophysical Research,2002,107(D14):ACL 3-1-ACL 3-11 CSCD被引 1    
2.  Bingen C. A global climatology of stratospheric aerosol size distribution parameters derived from SAGE Ⅱ data over the period 1984-2000: 1. Methodology and climatological observations. Journal of Geophysical Research,2004,109:D06201 CSCD被引 2    
3.  Bingen C. A global climatology of stratospheric aerosol size distribution parameters derived from SAGE Ⅱ data over the period 1984-2000: 2. Reference data. Journal of Geophysical Research,2004,109:D06202 CSCD被引 3    
4.  Brogniez C. Analysis of 5 year aerosol data from the stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment Ⅱ. Journal of Geophysical Research,1991,96(D8):15479-15497 CSCD被引 1    
5.  Burton S P. Comparison of aerosol extinction measurements by ILAS and SAGE Ⅱ. Geophysical Research Letters,1999,26(12):1719-1722 CSCD被引 1    
6.  陈洪滨. 利用 SAGE Ⅱ 资料分析皮纳图博火山爆发前后平流层气溶胶的变化特征. 科学通报,1994,39(22):2084-2087 CSCD被引 8    
7.  Fernald F G. Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. Applied Optics,1984,23(5):652-653 CSCD被引 291    
8.  Fiocco G. Observations of the upper atmosphere by optical radar in Alaska and Sweden during the summer 1964. Tellus,1966,18(1):34-38 CSCD被引 1    
9.  Hitchman M H. A climatology of stratospheric aerosol. Journal of Geophysical Research,1994,99(D10):20689-20700 CSCD被引 5    
10.  Junge C E. Stratospheric aerosols. Journal of Meteorology,1961,18(1):81-108 CSCD被引 1    
11.  李维亮. 青藏高原地区气溶胶的时空分布特征及其辐射强迫和气候效应的数值模拟. 中国科学(D辑),2001,31(S1):300-307 CSCD被引 9    
12.  刘煜. 青藏高原平流层臭氧和气溶胶的变化趋势研究. 气象学报,2007,65(6):938-945 CSCD被引 4    
13.  Mauldin L E. Stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment Ⅱ instrument: a functional description. Optical Engineering,1985,24(2):242307 CSCD被引 3    
14.  McCormick M P. Satellite studies of the stratospheric aerosols. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society,1979,60(9):1038-1046 CSCD被引 3    
15.  Osborn M T. SAGE Ⅱ aerosol correlative observations: profile measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research,1989,94(D6):8353-8366 CSCD被引 3    
16.  Rosen J M. The boiling point of stratospheric aerosols. Journal of Applied Meteorology,1971,10(5):1044-1046 CSCD被引 1    
17.  Sasano Y. Tropospheric aerosol extinction coefficient profiles derived from scanning lidar measurements over Tsukuba, Japan, from 1990 to 1993. Applied Optics,1996,35(24):4941-4952 CSCD被引 45    
18.  Sasano Y. Light scattering characteristics of various aerosol types derived from multiple wavelength lidar observations. Applied Optics,1989,28(9):1670-1679 CSCD被引 13    
19.  Takamura T. Ratio of aerosol backscatter to extinction coefficients as determined from angular scattering measurements for use in atmospheric lidar applications. Optical and Quantum Electronics,1987,19(5):293-302 CSCD被引 12    
20.  陶宗明. 激光雷达反演气溶胶后向散射系数误差估算. 中国激光,2011,38(12):1214001 CSCD被引 14    
引证文献 2

1 杨昊 星-地激光雷达联合观测合肥地区的气溶胶垂直分布 中国激光,2021,48(1):0110001
CSCD被引 9

2 聂鑫 平流层硫酸盐气溶胶辐射效应的模拟研究 环境科学学报,2022,42(11):372-382
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有2篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号