帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity of the Individual Authenticity Measure at Work for Chinese Employees

查看参考文献19篇

刘兴云   王詠 *  
文摘 目的:检验员工真实性量表(Individual authenticity measure at work.IAM Work)在中国企业员工中应用的信度和效度。方法:用IAM Work中文版对657名企业员工进行测试,在样本中随机抽取214名员工同时施测IAM Work中文版、Utrecht工作投入量表简版(UWES-9)、建言行为量表和中国企业员工工作幸福感量表,并在两个月后重测。结果:验证性因素分析验证了员工真实性的三因素模型。各拟合指标分别为X~2/df=2.61,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05。简版量表为X~2/df=2.99,NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AG-FI=0.94,RMSEA=0.06。所有项目的决断值均显著(P<0.001),项目与量表总分的相关在0.46~0.77之间。IAM Work中文版量表和真实的生活、自我异化、接受外部影响的Cronbach 's a系数依次为0.92、0.90、0.93、0.91。简版量表的Cronbach's a系数依次为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.92。IAM Work量表两个月后的重测信度为0.79,简版为0.78。IAM Work中文版总分、简版总分与工作幸福感(r=0.67,0.58,P<0.01)、工作投入(r=0.50,0.43,P<0.01)与建言行为(r=0.34, 0.23,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:IAM Work中文版量表和简版量表具有良好的信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。
其他语种文摘 Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Individual Authenticity Measure at Work(IAM Work). Methods: The reliability and validity of the IAM Work was tested using a sample size of 657 employees. To evaluate the validity of the IAM Work, 214 employees were randomly selected to test with the IAM Work, UWES-9, Voice Behavior Scale, and the Employee Occupational Well-being in Chinese Enterprises Scale. These employees were re-tested two months later. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure model. The fitted indices are X~2/df=2.61, NFI=0.94, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.91, RMSEA=0.05, and the fitted indices for the short version are X~2/df=2.99, NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.06. The critical ratios of all the items were statistically significant(P<0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.46 to 0.77. The Cronbach' s a coefficients of the total scale, authentic living, self-alienation, and accepting external influence subscale were 0.92,0.90, 0.93 and 0.91 respectively. The Cronbach' s a coefficients for the short version are 0.89, 0.83, 0.92 and 0.92 respectively. The test-retest reliability after 2 months is 0.79 for the full scale and 0.78 for the short version. The total scores of both the Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version showed significant positive correlations with occupational well-being(r=0.67, 0.58, P<0.01), work engagement(r=0.50, 0.43, P<0.01), and the Voice Behavior Scale total score(r=0.34, 0.23,P<0.01). Conclusion: Both Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version are reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring the authenticity of Chinese employees.
来源 中国临床心理学杂志 ,2016,24(3):454-458 【核心库】
DOI 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.03.016
关键词 员工真实性 ; 员工真实性量表(IAM Work) ; 信度 ; 效度
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1005-3611
学科 基础医学
基金 中科院心理所创新项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5723535

参考文献 共 19 共1页

1.  Kernis M H. Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry,2003,14(1):1-26 CSCD被引 30 次    
2.  Seligman M E. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist,2000,55(1):5-14 CSCD被引 100 次    
3.  van den Bosch R. Authenticity at work: Development and validation of an individual authenticity measure at work. Journal of Happiness Studies,2014,15(1):1-18 CSCD被引 4 次    
4.  van den Bosch R. The authentic worker' s well-being and performance: The relationship between authenticity at work, well-being, and work outcomes. Journal of Psychology,2014,148(6):659-681 CSCD被引 2 次    
5.  Knoll M. Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification. Journal of Positive Psychology,2013,8(4):346-360 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Kernis M H. A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2006,38:283-357 CSCD被引 14 次    
7.  Wood A M. The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology,2008,55(3):385-399 CSCD被引 11 次    
8.  Lopez F G. Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology,2006,53(3):362-371 CSCD被引 6 次    
9.  Walumbwa F O. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management,2008,34(1):89-126 CSCD被引 31 次    
10.  王震. 真实型领导：概念、测量、形成与作用. 心理科学进展,2014,22(3):458-473 CSCD被引 6 次    
11.  张珊珊. 领导-团队投入匹配对团队绩效的影响: 团队满意度氛围的作用. 心理科学,2014,37(1):140-145 CSCD被引 2 次    
12.  段锦云. 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报,2011,43(10):1185-1197 CSCD被引 26 次    
13.  黄亮. 中国企业员工工作幸福感的维度结构研究. 中央财经大学学报,2014,10:84-112 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Hair J F. Multivariate data analysis,2010 CSCD被引 6 次    
15.  Pavlou P A. Understanding and mitigati-nguncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly,2007,31(1):105-136 CSCD被引 12 次    
16.  Suh E M. Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2002,83(6):1378-1391 CSCD被引 7 次    
17.  English T. Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007,93(3):478-490 CSCD被引 6 次    
18.  Robinson O C. Authenticity, social context, and well-being in the United States, England, and Russia: A three country comparative analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2013,44(5):719-737 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  Church A T. Relating self-concept consistency to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2014,45(5):695-712 CSCD被引 3 次    
引证文献 3 篇

1 李勇男 中文版荷兰进食行为问卷在中国大学生群体中的适用 中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(2):277-281,326
CSCD被引 8 次

2 叶素怡 正念训练对员工真实性和工作幸福感的影响 中国临床心理学杂志,2019,27(4):843-847,781
CSCD被引 2 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号