12~18岁留守儿童亲社会行为倾向及其与主观健康水平的关系
Prosocial Tendency and Its Relation to Subjective Health Level of Left-behind Children Aged 12 to 18
查看参考文献35篇
文摘
|
目的探讨12~18岁留守儿童亲社会行为倾向及其与主观健康水平的关系。方法2012年12月—2014年6月,根据纳入与排除标准,选取中国科学院心理研究所承担的国家科技支撑计划——— 《社会变迁过程中儿童青少年的心理发展特点及心理问题疏导与咨询技术》项目中的8 029例儿童为调查对象。项目组采用统一编制的人口学问卷和青少年亲社会行为倾向量表(PTM)对我国东北、华北、西北、华中、西南、华南和华东7个区域的儿童进行了问卷调查。根据是否为留守儿童分为留守组(2 103例)和非留守组(5 926例)。记录各组儿童的一般资料(包括性别、年龄、地区)、亲社会行为倾向得分和主观健康水平。结果两组儿童年龄分布、地区分布、主观健康水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。非留守组和留守组儿童PTM总分均随年龄的增长先下降后上升。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、匿名维度得分上,组别主效应和年龄主效应均显著(P <0.05);组别与年龄有交互作用(P <0.05)。在利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应不显著(P >0.05);年龄主效应显著(P <0.05);组别与年龄有交互作用(P <0.05)。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应和地区主效应均显著(P <0.05);组别与地区有交互作用(P <0.05)。在匿名维度得分上,组别主效应和地区主效应均显著(P <0.05);组别与地区无交互作用(P >0.05)。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、匿名维度得分、利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应不显著(P >0.05);主观健康水平主效应显著(P <0.05);组别与主观健康水平无交互作用(P >0.05)。留守组、非留守组PTM总分与主观健康水平均呈正相关(r=0.099、0.077,P <0.01)。结论留守儿童亲社会行为倾向随年龄的增长先下降后上升;年龄、地区和主观健康水平对留守儿童亲社会行为倾向均有显著影响;主观健康水平越高,留守儿童亲社会行为倾向越高。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To investigate the prosocial tendency and its relation to subjective health level of left-behind children aged 12 to 18. Methods According to inclusion and exclusion criteria,we enrolled 8 029 children between December2012 and June 2014 from the program of " mental development features of children and adolescents in the process of social change and guidance and consultation skills of their mental problems", a national sci-tech support plan undertaken by the Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences. In the program,a uniformly designed demographic questionnaire and the scale of prosocial tendencies measure (PTM) for adolescents were adopted to conduct questionnaire survey on children in 7 regions of China which were northeast China,north China,northwest China,central China,southwest China,south China and east China. According to being left-behind children or not,the enrolled children were divided into two groups: left-behind group(n = 2 103) and non left-behind group (n = 5 926). The general data (including gender,age and region), score of prosocial tendency and subjective health level were recorded. Results The two groups were significantly different in age distribution,region distribution and subjective health level (P < 0.05). The PTM total scores of the two groups decreased first and then increased as age increased. As for the total score of PTM and the scores of public dimension and anonymous dimension,the main effects of group and age were both significant (P < 0.05); there was interaction effect between group and age (P < 0.05). As for the scores of altruism dimension,compliance dimension,emotion dimension and emergency dimension,the main effect of group was not significant (P > 0.05); and the main effect of age was significant (P < 0.05); there was interaction effect between group and age (P < 0.05). As for the total score of PTM and the scores of public dimension,altruism dimension,compliance dimension,emotion dimension and emergency dimension,the main effects of group and region were both significant(P < 0.05); there was interaction effect between group and region (P < 0.05). As for the score of anonymous dimension,the main effects of group and region were both significant (P < 0.05); there was no interaction effect between group and region (P >0.05). As for the total score of PTM,the scores of public dimension,anonymous dimension,altruism dimension,compliance dimension,emotion dimension and emergency dimension,the main effect of group was not significant (P > 0.05); the main effect of subject health level was significant (P < 0.05); there was no interaction effect between group and subjective health level(P > 0.05). The total scores of PTM of the two groups were both positively correlated with subjective health level (r = 0.099,0.077; P < 0.01). Conclusion Left-behind children see their prosocial tendency decrease first and then increase as age increases. Age,region and subjective health level have significant influence on the prosocial tendency of left-behind children. With the increase of subjective health level,the prosocial tendency of left-behind children increases. |
来源
|
中国全科医学
,2016,19(12):1451-1457 【扩展库】
|
DOI
|
10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.12.019
|
关键词
|
儿童
;
留守儿童
;
健康状况
;
亲社会行为
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1007-9572 |
基金
|
国家科技支撑计划项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5694014
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
1.
马良. 儿童保护政策与留守儿童社会支持系统-对贵州毕节留守儿童自杀事件的反思.
青少年研究与实践,2015,30(4):8-12
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
赵景欣. 留守青少年的社会支持网络与其抑郁、孤独之间的关系---基于变量中心和个体中心的视角.
心理发展与教育,2008,24(1):36-42
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
3.
唐婉.
留守初中生亲社会行为与领悟社会支持的关系研究,2011
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
4.
郭红林.
留守儿童心理理论、亲社会行为与友谊质量的相关研究,2013
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
尤祺.
青海省高中留守儿童自尊、亲社会行为倾向与学业成就归因的关系研究,2014
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
郭雯.
农村留守儿童亲社会行为与社会支持研究,2014
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
张帆. 我国留守儿童心理健康问题研究的系统评价.
中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(8):849-857
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
8.
李浩然. 对留守儿童心理健康研究的元分析.
中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(1):77-79
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
胡心怡. 生活压力事件、应对方式对留守儿童心理健康的影响.
中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(5):502-503,501
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
10.
胡昆. 农村留守儿童心理健康状况调查研究.
中国健康心理学杂志,2010,18(8):994-996
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
11.
唐少云.
青少年流动人口犯罪预防的支持系统分析---基于上海市P区的实证研究,2013
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
魏军锋. 亲子分离对农村留守初中生心身症状的影响.
中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(2):83-85
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
13.
李艳兰. 儿童期亲子分离对大学生自杀意念、攻击性影响.
中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(4):678-681
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Liu Z. Left too early: the effects of age at separation from parents on Chinese rural children' s symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Am J Public Health,2009,99(11):2049-2054
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
15.
王娟. 农村留守儿童身心健康问题的研究现状.
解放军护理杂志,2009,26(18):39-41
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
李光友. 14 ~ 16岁留守儿童心理状况及自杀倾向分析.
中国公共卫生,2009,25(8):905-907
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Carlo G. The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence,2002,3(1):31-44
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Carlo G. Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents.
J Early Adolesc,2003,23(1):107-134
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
19.
寇彧. 大学生亲社会倾向、亲社会推理以及它们的相关模式.
心理科学,2004,27(2):329-332
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
20.
寇彧. 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订.
心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):112-117
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|