Improving a method for evaluating alfalfa cultivar resistance to thrips
查看参考文献34篇
文摘
|
The thrips quantity ratio (TQR) model is an important tool for evaluating crop resistance to thrips based on the correlation between thrips quantities and cultivars. Unfortunately, it is inaccurate, and the results appear significantly inconsistent when analysing the same cultivars in the same field study. To improve this model, we first studied the resistance of 28 alfalfa cultivars to thrips in Cangzhou, Hebei Province, north China. The results showed that the most suitable evaluation period was from May to June, as the thrips population was stable during this period. Second, we found that the natural enemy population was significantly positively correlated with the thrips population density (R=0.7275, P<0.0001), which might influence resistance estimation. Hence, we introduced a parameter ‘α’, corresponding to the natural enemy quantity ratio, to eliminate the effect of the natural enemy using “αTQR”. Using the improved method, 28 cultivars were clustered into three classes: the resistant class, sensitive class, and median class. All numerical values were calculated for αTQR displayed as a Gaussian distribution. This information showed that all data should be divided into nine groups using a median value of 1±0.1 with an equal difference of 0.1. Based on the new standard cultivars, Gongnong 1, Alfaking, Cangzhou and Algonquin were classified as highly resistant cultivars; Zhongmu 3, Gongnong 2, Zhongmu 1 and Zhongmu 2 were classified in the resistant group; Queen was classified in the moderately resistant group; Derby, WL354HQ, KRIMA, Apex, 53HR, SARDI 5 and Farmers Treasure were classified in the median class; WL319HQ, WL343HQ and Sitel were classified as the low sensitive group; WL440HQ and SARDI 7 as the moderately sensitive group; WL168HQ and Sanditi as the sensitive group; and SARDI 10, WL363HQ, FD4, WL323 and SOCA as the highly sensitive group. |
来源
|
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
,2016,15(3):600-607 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61197-2
|
关键词
|
thrips quantity ratio (TQR) model
;
alfalfa
;
cultivar resistance
;
thrips
;
natural enemy
|
地址
|
1.
Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing, 100193
2.
College of Plant Protection/Biopesticide Engineering Research Center of Liaoning Province, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110161
3.
Institute of Agro-Resourse and Environment, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, 050051
|
语种
|
英文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
2095-3119 |
学科
|
植物保护 |
基金
|
support by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5673915
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
1.
Alabi O Y. Field evaluation of cowpea cultivars (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) for resistance to flower bud thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom) (Thysanoptera:Thripidae).
International Journal of Pest Management,2003,49:287-291
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Cheng L. The effects of Therioaphis trifolii on the activities of PAL, POD and PPO in five alfalfa varieties.
Plant Protection. (in Chinese),2009,35:87-90
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Cuperus G W. Economic injury levels and economic thresholds for pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), on alfalfa.
Crop Protection,1982,1:453-463
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Dan G. Dynamics of common green lacewing (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) in Israeli cotton fields in relation to whitefly (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae) populations.
Environmental Entomology,1997,26:815-827
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Fang Q. Expression of immune-reponse genes in lepidopteran host is suppressed by venom from an endoparasitoid, Pteromalus puparum.
BMC Genomics,2010,11:1471-2164
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Farmer E E. Surface-to-air signals.
Nature,2001,411:854-856
|
CSCD被引
50
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Funderburk J. Ecology of thrips.
Thrips and Tospoviruses:Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera,2001:121-128
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Ge F. Major advance on the interaction mechanism among plants, pest insects and natural enemies in China.
Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology. (in Chinese),2011,48:1-6
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Girousse C. Dissection of the effects of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum feeding on assimilate partitioning in Medicago sativa.
New Phytologist,2003,157:83-92
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Han Y F.
Economic Insect Fauna of China. (in Chinese),1997
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
He C G. Field evaluation on resistance of 40 Medicago cultivars (lines) to thrips.
Acta Pratacultural Sinica. (in Chinese),2007,16:79-83
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Hesler L S. Resistance to soybean aphid among wild soybean lines under controlled conditions.
Crop Protection,2013,53:139-146
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Hu G X. Study on resistance mechanism of Medicago sativa to Odontothrips loti.
Pratacultural Science. (in Chinese),2007,24:86-89
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Hu G X. Tolerance of alfalfa varieties to Odontothrips loti Haliday.
Acta Agrestia Sinica. (in Chinese),2009,17:505-509
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Kappers I F. Genetic engineering of terpenoid metabolism attracts bodyguards to Arabidopsis.
Science,2005,309:2070-2072
|
CSCD被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Li Y Z. Evaluation on the resistance of alfalfa to thrips.
Pratacultural Science,2000,23:9-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Lin H Q. Advance in research on the orientation mechanism of herbivorous insects and natural enemies.
Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. (in Chinese),2009,24:191-196
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Liu D. The prevention and control of alfalfa aphid.
Shandong Province Animal Husbandry and Veterinary. (in Chinese),2012,33:94-96
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Luginbill P.
Developing resistant Plants the ideal method of controlling insects. USDA-ARS Product Research Report, 11,1969:1-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Maris P C. Thrips resistance in pepper and its consequences for the acquisition and inoculation of Tomato spotted wilt virus by the western flower thrips.
Phytopathology,2003,93:96-101
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|