个人碳交易机制对消费者能源消费影响研究
Study on the effect of personal carbon trading scheme on consumers' energy consumption
查看参考文献31篇
|
文摘
|
二氧化碳排放量增加引起的气候变暖问题已严重影响了人类社会的可持续发展,目前世界上各个国家和地区都在采取措施以应对这一难题.研究表明消费者能源消费行为对碳排放具有重要影响,加强对消费者能源消费行为的引导、管制和激励,形成低碳能源消费模式,具有重要的理论和现实意义.基于个人碳交易(personal carbon trading, PCT)的理论框架,构建了个人碳交易机制下消费者能源选择模型并对碳交易市场均衡问题进行了分析.研究发现:个人碳交易机制能够刺激消费者选择清洁能源,形成低碳能源消费模式;碳排放权的供给曲线不同于一般商品的供给曲线,其供给量随着碳价的升高而降低;初始碳配额量应该设置在一个合理的水平上,才能保证买卖双方的交易能够实现. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The global warming problem caused by carbon emissions has significantly influence the sustainable development of human society. Nowadays, more and more countries and regions are taking measures to cope with this problem. Researches indicated that consumers' energy consumption has a significant influence on the carbon emissions. To guide, regulate and motivate consumers' energy consumption behavior is benefit to make a low-carbon energy consumption pattern, which has an important theoretical and realistic significance. Based on the personal carbon trading scheme, we construct an energy use choice model and analyze the market equilibrium of the carbon trading. It is shown that personal carbon trading scheme can motivate consumers to choose clean energy and to make a low-carbon energy consumption pattern. The supply curve of the carbon allowance is different from the general commodity supply curve. When the carbon price increases, the supply quantity of the carbon allowance will decrease. The initial allocated carbon allowance should be set at an appropriate level, thus, the carbon trading among consumers can be achieved. |
|
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2016,36(1):77-85 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.12011/1000-6788(2016)01-0077-09
|
|
关键词
|
个人碳交易
;
能源消费
;
临界碳价
;
均衡碳价
;
初始碳配额
|
|
地址
|
中国科学技术大学管理学院, 合肥, 230026
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5630753
|
参考文献 共
31
共2页
|
|
1.
李进. 碳交易机制对物流配送路径决策的影响研究.
系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(7):1779-1787
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
范进. 消费排放权交易对消费者选择行为的影响-源自实验经济学的证据.
中国工业经济,2012,3(3):30-42
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
王兆华. 基于省际面板数据的中国城镇居民用电直接回弹效应研究.
系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(7):1678-1686
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Binswanger M. Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect?.
Ecological Economics,2001,36(1):119-132
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Greening A L. Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect - A survey.
Energy Policy,2000,28(6):389-401
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Lenzen M. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia.
Ecological Economics,2001,37(2):229-255
|
CSCD被引
99
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Sorrell S. Jevons' paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency.
Energy Policy,2009,37(4):1456-1469
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Ekholm T. Determinants of household energy consumption in India.
Energy Policy,2010,38(10):5696-5707
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
王建明. 公众低碳消费模式的影响因素模型与政府管制政策-基于扎根理论的一个探索性研究.
管理世界,2011,4:58-68
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Bristow A L. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax.
Ecological Economics,2010,69(9):1824-1837
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Fawcett T. An introduction to personal carbon trading.
Climate Policy,2010,10(4):329-338
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fleming D. Stopping the traffic.
Country Life,1996,140(19):62-65
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Fawcett T. Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time?.
Energy Policy,2010,38(11):6868-6876
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Miliband D. Environment, food and rural affairs: House of Commons Debate.
Climate Policy,2006,14(4):29-38
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Parag Y. Cross policy learning: Drawing lessons for personal carbon trading (PCT) policy from food labelling schemes.
APPAM Conference: The Next Decade - What Are the Big Policy Challenges,2008:1-10
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Meyer A.
Contraction & convergence: The global solution to climate change,2000
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Starkey R. Personal carbon trading: A critical survey Part 2: Efficiency and effectiveness.
Ecological Economics,2012,73:19-28
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Hobbs B F. Upstream vs. downstream CO_2 trading: A comparison for the electricity context.
Energy Policy,2010,38(7):3632-3643
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Raux C. The potential for CO_2 emissions trading in transport: The case of personal vehicles and freight.
Energy Efficiency,2010,3(2):133-148
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Wadud Z. Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?.
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2011,45(10):1052-1065
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问