中国环境规制、地理区位与企业生产率增长
Environmental regulation, geographic location and growth of firms' productivity in China
查看参考文献28篇
|
文摘
|
环境规制对企业生产率的影响是当前学术界的研究热点,但基于地理区位视角的研究较少。应用中国环境规制地理空间数据和微观企业数据,实证分析了环境规制空间差异与环境规制空间相关性对企业生产率的影响。结果表明,环境规制空间差异与企业生产率之间存在显著的倒U型关系;环境规制空间相关性作用显著,邻近城市环境规制提升有利于本城市企业生产率增长;环境规制对生产效率高的企业具有显著促进作用,但对生产效率低的企业影响不明显;不同的地理区位,环境规制对企业生产率的影响不同,相对于中西部地区,东部地区环境规制促进企业生产率增长的作用更为显著。本文揭示了在地理区位视角下,针对环境规制对企业生产率的影响,“成本假说”和“波特假说”具有各自的解释空间。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The impact of environmental regulations on firms' productivities is a hot topic at present, but little attention has been paid to the geographic location aspect. As the literature show two kinds of theories named "Cost hypothesis" and "Porter hypothesis" according to the impact of environmental regulations on firms' productivities, this paper empirically analyzes the influences of spatial difference and interdependence of environmental regulations on firms' productivity based geographic data and micro-firm-level data for the period of 2004-2007. Our results show that spatial difference of environmental regulations has a significant impact on firms' total factor productivity with an inverted U-shaped relationship. That is to say, appropriate intensity of environmental regulations could promote firms' productivities, but if the environmental regulations are too intensive, firms' productivity might decrease. The effect of spatial correlation of environmental regulation is significant. The environmental regulation of neighborhoods can promote the productivity of firms in native city. Environmental regulation has a significant impact on the firms with high efficiency, but no significant influence on firms with low efficiency. Besides, the impact of environmental regulation on productivity of pollution- intensive firms is variant according to geographic location. The promotion of environmental regulation on firms' productivity is stronger in the eastern region than in the central and western regions. Our research suggests different mechanisms for the Cost hypothesis and Porter hypothesis in the context of geographic location. The governments shall make different regulations in different parts of the country instead of one policy. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2015,70(10):1581-1591 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201510004
|
|
关键词
|
环境规制
;
地理区位
;
企业生产率
;
波特假说
;
中国
|
|
地址
|
北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京, 100871
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;环境保护管理 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金国家杰出青年科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5539968
|
参考文献 共
28
共2页
|
|
1.
.
World Bank. Toward a Green, Clean and Resilient World for All: A World Bank Group Environment Strategy, 2012-2022,2012
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Economy E. Environmental enforcement in China.
China's environment and the challenge of sustainable development,2005:102-120
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Cao K. Coarse-grained parallel genetic algorithm applied to a vector based land use allocation optimization problem: The case study of Tongzhou Newtown, Beijing, China.
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2013,27(5):1133-1142
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
He C F. Is economic transition harmful to China's urban environment? Evidence from industrial air pollution in Chinese cities.
Urban Studies,2012,49(8):1767-1790
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
He C F. Air quality in urban China.
Eurasian Geography and Economics,2012,53(6):750-771
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Jaffe A B. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?.
Journal of Economic literature,1995,33(1):132-163
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Christainsen G B. Public regulations and the slowdown in productivity growth.
The American Economic Review,1981,71(2):320-325
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Barbera A J. Effects of pollution control on industry productivity: A factor demand approach.
The Journal of Industrial Economics,1986,35(2):161-172
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Gray W B. The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown.
The American Economic Review,1987,77(5):998-1006
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Jorgenson D W. Environmental regulation and US economic growth.
The Rand Journal of Economics,1990,21(2):314-340
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Greenstone M.
The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 & 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures. NBER Working Paper No. 8484,2001
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
李春米. 环境规制下的西部地区工业全要素生产率变动分析.
西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2012,32(1):18-22
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Gollop F M. Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation.
The Journal of Political Economy,1983,91(4):654-674
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Millimet D L. Environmental regulation and productivity growth: An analysis of US manufacturing industries.
Empirical Modeling of the Economy and the Environment,2003,20:7-22
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Porter M E. America's Green Strategy.
Scientific American,1991,264(4):168-170
|
CSCD被引
85
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Porter M E. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship.
The journal of economic perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118
|
CSCD被引
332
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Ambec S. The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?.
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2013,7(1):2-22
|
CSCD被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Hamamoto M. Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries.
Resource and Energy Economics,2006,28(4):299-312
|
CSCD被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Yang C H. Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries.
Resource and Energy Economics,2012,34(4):514-532
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Berman E. Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries.
Review of Economics and Statistics,2001,83(3):498-510
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问