沉积物质量综合评价及应用证据权重法的案例分析
Integrated Sediment Quality Assessment:A Case Study Based on Weight of Evidence Approach
查看参考文献55篇
|
文摘
|
水体沉积物是水生生态系统重要的组成部分,沉积物污染将影响整个水生生态系统,因此有必要构建科学全面的水体沉积物质量评价方法,为环境污染修复与监管提供科学依据。已有文献报道了多种沉积物质量评价方法。其中,证据权重法通过对不同的证据进行测定与整合,弥补了传统评价方法的不足,可以对沉积物质量进行科学全面的评价。本文对证据权重法中化学分析、生物毒性和底栖生物群落结构3种证据的测量方法、赋权方法、证据整合与信息解译方法进行了系统评述,并以淡水河为例介绍了用多目标决策理想点法(TOPSIS)整合数据进行沉积物质量综合评价的方法。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Sediment is an important part of aquatic ecosystems,and its pollution can affect the health of the whole ecosystem. Therefore,it is essential to develop a proper sediment quality assessment method,which can facilitate pollution control,and provide a scientific basis for further remediation of contaminated aquatic environments. Various sediment quality assessment methods have been proposed in the past. Among those assessment methods,weight of evidence approach measures and integrates different lines of evidences,which can make up the drawbacks of those traditional simple evaluation methods and provide scientific and comprehensive evaluation of sediment quality. This paper introduced the three major lines of evidences including sediment chemistry,toxicity and benthic community, as well as weighting methods and relevant information integrating methods. A detailed procedure of sediment quality assessment was introduced here with Danshui River as an example by using technique for order preference by similarity (TOPSIS) to integrate data. |
|
来源
|
生态毒理学报
,2015,10(3):71-82 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.7524/AJE.1673-5897-20140726001
|
|
关键词
|
沉积物质量评价
;
沉积物质量三元法
;
信息整合方法
;
证据权重法
;
多目标决策理想点法
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院广州地球化学研究所, 有机地球化学国家重点实验室, 广州, 510640
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1673-5897 |
|
学科
|
环境科学基础理论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金-广东联合基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5489782
|
参考文献 共
55
共3页
|
|
1.
Burgess R M. Mechanistic sediment quality guidelines based on contaminant bioavailability:Equilibrium partitioning sediment benchmarks.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2013,32(1):102-114
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Apitz S E. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments:Part I,developing an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,2005,1(1):2-8
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Chapman P M. A decision-making framework for sediment contamination.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,2005,1(3):163-173
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
王菊英.
海洋沉积物的环境质量评价研究,2004:3-4
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Apitz S E. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments:Part II,evaluating risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,2005,1(1):e1-e14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Hartwell S I. Empirical assessment of incorporating sediment quality triad data into a single index to distinguish dominant stressors between sites.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2011,174(1/4):605-623
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Costa P M. Can the integration of multiple biomarkers and sediment geochemistry aid solving the complexity of sediment risk assessment? A case study with a benthic fish.
Environmental Pollution,2012,161:107-120
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Hope B K. A strategy for using weight-of-evidence methods in ecological risk assessments.
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:An International Journal,2013,20(2):290-315
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Sorvari J. Assessment of ecological risks at former landfill site using TRIAD procedure and multicriteria analysis.
Risk Analysis,2013,33(2):203-219
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
吴斌. 证据权重法及其在近海沉积物环境质量评价中的应用研究进展.
应用生态学报,2013,24(1):286-294
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Chapman P M. Should the sediment quality triad become a tetrad,a pentad,or possibly even a hexad?.
Journal of Soils and Sediments,2006,6(1):4-8
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Lotufo G.
Processes,Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments,2014:131-175
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
Methods for Collection,Storage and Manipulation of Sediments for Chemical and Toxicological Analyses:Technical Manual,2009
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Fairey R. An evaluation of methods for calculating mean sediment quality guideline quotients as indicators of contamination and acute toxicity to amphipods by chemical mixtures.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2001,20(10):2276-2286
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
陈云增. 淡水沉积物环境质量基准差异分析.
湖泊科学,2005,17(3):193-201
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
钟文珏. 水体沉积物质量基准研究现状.
生态毒理学报,2013,8(3):285-294
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Kwok K H. Sediment quality guidelines:Challenges and opportunities for improving sediment management.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2014,21(1):17-27
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Burton J G A. Sediment quality criteria in use around the world.
Limnology,2002,3(2):65-76
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
MacDonald D D. Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems.
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2000,39(1):20-31
|
CSCD被引
190
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Vidal D E. Comparative sediment quality guideline performance for predicting sediment toxicity in Southern California,USA.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2005,24(12):3173-3182
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问