反事实思维对行人交通安全行为意向的影响
Effect of Counterfactual Thinking on the Safe Behavior Intention of Pedestrians
查看参考文献33篇
|
文摘
|
反事实思维是对过去发生事情进行否定而产生的假设性思维表征,对行为改变和绩效改善有显著影响。因此,作为一种重要的认知策略,反事实思维常常被用于行为干预的研究。本研究采用单因素(反事实启动/经验启动)被试间实验设计,以4种常见的行人不安全行为为实验材料,运用顺序启动范式的语义启动分别激活自变量的两个水平,将遵守交通规则行为意向的评分和反应时双变量作为因变量指标,探索反事实思维对行人安全行为的促进作用。结果表明:与基线水平和经验启动相比,反事实启动诱导产生的行人交通安全行为意向更加积极,并且产生的自动化水平更高。文章最后讨论了研究的理论意义和对安全管理实践的启发。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Counterfactual thinking refers to the mental representations of alternatives to past events. It plays an important role in changing behaviors and improving performance by converting information about past mistakes into plans for future actions. As an important cognitive strategy, counterfactual thinking is used in behavioral interventions. The current study explores whether counterfactual thinking, which has a behavior-regulating function, improves the behavioral intention of pedestrians. Four frequent unsafe behaviors of pedestrians were chosen as the experimental materials. A one-factor between-subjects study was designed. The participants were randomly divided into two groups, namely, the experimental (counterfactual priming) and the control (experience priming) groups. To match the sample from the experimental and control groups, we excluded the effect of individual differences and measured the baseline of all the participants based on factual thinking, that is, their intention to follow a traffic rule (rating on a 6-point Likert scale) and their reaction time in rating. Next, a modified sequential priming paradigm was applied to prime the counterfactual thinking (experimental condition) or past experience (control condition) of the participants. The participants were then asked about their intention to follow the traffic rule again. As dependent variables, both the behavioral intention and reaction time were recorded again. The results showed that the intention of all the participants to follow traffic rules was positive. A paired-sample t-test was conducted to test the differences in intention and reaction times between the baseline and the two treatments. The rating scores and reaction times in baseline and experimental conditions showed significant differences. Specifically, the behavioral intention of the experimental group was more positive and their reaction time in rating was faster than those in the baseline. However, the rating scores in the baseline and control conditions showed no significant differences, although the reaction time of the control group was faster than the baseline. Hence, the behavioral intention of the pedestrians generally relied on past experience, and counterfactual thinking had a positive effect on the behavioral intention of such pedestrians. To exclude the effects of individual differences, ANCOVA was used to explore the possible differences between the two groups, using the baseline rating score and reaction time as the covariates. After controlling for the rating score and reaction time of the baseline, the post-test rating scores in these two groups were found to be non-significant. However, there were obvious trends that the score of the counterfactual priming group was higher than that of the past experience group, and the reaction time of the former was significantly faster than that of the latter. Thus, counterfactual thinking enabled pedestrians to choose positive behavioral intention, and this facilitation effect was not only for the behavioral intention rating but also for the reaction time. In conclusion, the current study provides a better understanding of the improvement of behavioral intentions through counterfactual thinking. Furthermore, the behavioral intention of the pedestrians relies on past experience in daily life. However, it can be improved by priming through counterfactual thinking. In this way, counterfactual thinking can be an effective intervention strategy in traffic safety management. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2015,38(2):388-393 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
反事实思维
;
安全行为意向
;
顺序启动范式
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
学科
|
安全科学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院重点部署项目
;
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5427500
|
参考文献 共
33
共2页
|
|
1.
新华网.
北京行人闯红灯开罚近3月,交警称罚款收效并不大,2013
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈德良. 行人交通违章行为的博弈论分析.
工程和商业管理国际学术会议(EBM),2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
陈俊. 反事实思维两大理论：范例说和目标-指向说.
心理科学进展,2007,15(3):416-422
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
樊春雷. 品牌态度强度与品牌态度可达性的关系性质.
心理学报,2007,39(2):355-361
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
李开兵. 行人交通违规行为的心理学研究.
公路交通科技,2007,24(5):130-134
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
鲁忠义. 工作记忆广度与汉语句子语境效应的关系.
心理学报,2006,38(1):22-29
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
吴昌旭. 行人过街的认知心理过程和模型.
心理科学进展,2013,21(7):1141-1149
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Bassili J N. Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice.
Personality and SociaI Psychology Bulletin,1995,21:686-695
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Conner M. Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use.
British Journal of Social Psychology,1999,38(2):195-222
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Cooke R. Properties of intention: Component structure and consequences for behavior, information processing, and resistance.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2013,43(4):749-760
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Dejoy D M. Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety.
Safety Science,2005,43:105-129
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Epstude K. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking Personality anid.
Social Psychology Review,2008,12:168-192
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Goldenbeld C. The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents: An evaluation study on rural roads in the Dutch province Friesland.
Accident Analysis and Prevention,2005,37:1135-1144
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Gollwitzer P M. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2006,38:69-119
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Kray L J. Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91(1):33-48
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Lewis I M. The role of fear appeals in improving driver safety: A review of the effectiveness of fear-arousing (threat) appeals in road safety advertising.
International Journal of Behavioral and Consultation Therapy,2007,3(2):203-222
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Markman K D. Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2007,33(3):312-324
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Markman K D. Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: A test of the reflection and evaluation model.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2008,44:421-428
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
McMullen M N. Downward counterfactuals and motivation: The wake-up call and the Pangloss effect.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26(5):575-584
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Nan X L. The pursuit of self-regulatory goals: How counterfactual thinking influences advertising persuasiveness.
Journal of Advertising,2008,37:17-27
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问