帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

公平的神经基础
Neural basis of fairness

查看参考文献105篇

王赟   吴斌   李纾   周媛 *  
文摘 公平问题是人类长久以来的话题,研究已经证实人们存在着公平偏好。关于公平的神经基础,研究者采用脑功能成像技术进行了深入探索,并提示了其在精神疾病研究中的应用价值。本文介绍研究公平行为的博弈实验范式——最后通牒博弈,概述基于最后通牒博弈的神经影像学研究发现。从分配额度、得失情境、框架效应、群体意见、社会地位及情绪几个方面,综述影响公平行为的因素及其神经基础。在临床研究方面,列举了有关抑郁症、精神病态患者及反社会青少年的公平行为及其神经基础的相关研究。分析表明,未来研究应注意从脑网络的角度对公平行为的神经基础进行探讨,考虑到具体的社会情境对公平行为的影响,加强博弈实验范式在神经精神疾病中的应用,并深入探索公平感知的神经计算模型。
其他语种文摘 Fairness is an essential ingredient in human society. Numerous studies have confirmed that people have fairness preference. With regard to the neural basis of fairness, researchers are focusing on the issue of neural mechanism that underlies fair behavior using neuroimaging techniques, and suggest a possibility to transfer the findings in the neural basis of fairness into clinical applications. In this paper, we first introduce a game theory-based paradigm for investigating fairness—the ultimatum game, and then review neuroimaging studies based on this game. In addition, we address the factors that may influence fairness and their neural mechanisms, namely, stake size, gain-loss contexts, framing effect, group opinion, social status, and emotion. We also summarize the studies that use the ultimatum game to investigate the clinical population, such as major depressive disorder, psychopathy, and antisocial adolescents. Meanwhile, we propose the followings: the neural mechanism of fairness should be examined from the perspective of brain networks, the influence of specific social contexts on fair behavior should be considered, the application of game theory paradigms in neuropsychiatric disorders should be strengthened, and the models of neural computation underlying fairness should be explored more deeply in future studies. Finally, we briefly introduce some Chinese researchers that are representative in this area.
来源 科技导报 ,2015,33(9):83-92 【扩展库】
DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.09.015
关键词 公平 ; 最后通牒博弈 ; 神经基础 ; 功能性磁共振
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 综述型
ISSN 1000-7857
学科 社会科学总论
基金 北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目 ;  北京市科技新星计划项目 ;  国家自然科学基金项目 ;  国家973计划
文献收藏号 CSCD:5426467

参考文献 共 105 共6页

1.  Falk A. On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry,2003,41(1):20-26 CSCD被引 9 次    
2.  Sutter M. Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age. Journal of Economic Psychology,2007,28(1):69-78 CSCD被引 7 次    
3.  Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory,1994 CSCD被引 18 次    
4.  梁竹苑. 神经经济学:探索人类决策行为的神经基础. 中国社会科学报,2010 CSCD被引 1 次    
5.  刘长江. 神经经济学：迈向脑科学的决策科学. 心理科学,2007,30(2):482-484 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Guth W. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1982,3(4):367-388 CSCD被引 60 次    
7.  Camerer C. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction,2003 CSCD被引 7 次    
8.  Glimcher P. Decision Making and the Brain,2008 CSCD被引 1 次    
9.  Brandts J. Reference points and negative reciprocity in simple sequential games. Games and Economic Behavior,2001,36(2):138-157 CSCD被引 1 次    
10.  Guth W. The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior,2001,37(1):161-169 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Radke S. There's something about a fair split: intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social decision-making. PloS One,2012,7(2):e31491 CSCD被引 5 次    
12.  Grosskopf B. Reinforcement and directional learning in the ultimatum game with responder competition. Experimental Economics,2003,6(2):141-158 CSCD被引 2 次    
13.  Cason T N. Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1998,42(2):248-265 CSCD被引 2 次    
14.  Weiland S. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining. Social Neuroscience,2012,7(5):537-551 CSCD被引 4 次    
15.  Zheng H. Neural mechanism of proposer's decision-making in the ultimatum and dictator games. Neural Regeneration Research,2013,8(4):357 CSCD被引 2 次    
16.  Kraut M A. Neuroanatomic organization of sound memory in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2006,18(11):1877-1888 CSCD被引 2 次    
17.  Guroglu B. Neural correlates of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity in sharing decisions. PloS One,2014,9(9):e107996 CSCD被引 3 次    
18.  Yu R. Overlapping and distinct representations of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality. Human Brain Mapping,2014,35(7):3290-3301 CSCD被引 4 次    
19.  Sanfey A G. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science,2003,300(5626):1755-1758 CSCD被引 68 次    
20.  Gabay A S. The Ultimatum Game and the brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2014,47:549-558 CSCD被引 7 次    
引证文献 4 篇

1 李欧 最后通牒博弈的个体差异和种族文化差异 心理科学,2016,39(3):693-699
CSCD被引 4 次

2 王赟 世纪科学之问“合作+行为是如何进化的”——中国学者的回应 科学通报,2016,61(1):20-33
CSCD被引 6 次

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

iAuthor 链接
李纾 0000-0003-4402-1674
版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号