帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

心理账户的认知标签与情绪标签对消费决策行为的影响
Effects of Cognitive and Affective Tags in Mental Accounting on Consumer Decision Making

查看参考文献40篇

李爱梅 1 *   李斌 1   许华 1   李伏岭 1   张耀辉 1   梁竹苑 2 *  
文摘 心理账户指个人和家庭在进行经济决策时, 从心理上对财富的来源和支付进行编码、记录、分类和估价的心理认知过程。本研究通过4个系列研究探讨了心理账户的认知标签与情绪标签对消费决策行为的影响, 并初步探索了其心理机制。结果发现:(1)心理账户的认知标签(财富来源为常规收入或意外之财)可影响消费决策, 个体倾向于将常规收入用于实用消费, 将意外之财用于享乐消费; (2)心理账户的认知标签与情绪标签对消费决策的影响具有交互作用。即, 情绪标签可影响意外之财的消费决策:积极情绪时个体倾向于将其用于享乐消费, 消极情绪时个体倾向于将其用于享乐规避, 出现心理账户与消费决策的情绪匹配效应; 但情绪标签对于常规收入的消费决策无显著影响, 个体均倾向于将其用于享乐规避; (3)内疚预期和内疚体验使个体更倾向于将消极情绪的意外之财用于享乐规避。上述结果表明, 心理账户的认知标签对消费决策具有“认知匹配效应”, 情绪标签对消费决策具有“情绪匹配效应”, 二者存在交互作用。内疚感是导致消极情绪标签的意外之财更倾向享乐规避的心理机制之一。
其他语种文摘 Mental accounting is the set of cognitive operations used by individuals and households to organize, evaluate, and keep track of financial activities. Mental accounting proposes that people utilize a set of cognitive labels to evaluate their financial activities, each of which is associated with different preferences to consume (Levav & McGraw, 2009; Kahneman & Tversky 1984; Thaler 1985, 1990). Mental accounting researchers have shown that windfall gains are spent more readily and frivolously than ordinary income. Consumers prefer to spend their windfall gains on hedonic consumptions but spend their ordinary incomes on utilitarian consumptions. Levav and McGraw (2009) suggested that emotional accounting, including people's feelings about money, also influences consumer choices. When people have negative feelings toward windfall, they opt to make utilitarian expenditures. However, the process of how cognitive (windfall or ordinary income) and affective (positive or negative emotion) tags interact in consumer behavior was not explored. This study proposes that both cognitive tag and affective tags in mental accounting affect consumer decision making. The objective of this study is to explore the interactive effect of cognitive and affective tags in mental accounting on consumer decision through four studies. In studies 1a and 1b, the effect of cognitive and affective tags in mental accounting on consumer decision making behavior was measured. Study 1a showed that the positive tag of windfall income is preferred for hedonic consumption, whereas the negative tag of windfall income is preferred for utilitarian consumption. Both positive and negative tags of ordinary income are preferred for utilitarian consumption. Study1b utilized a field study to examine actual consumption behavior. The results showed that when people received 15 Yuan RMB as ordinary income, they prefer to spend it on utilitarian consumption regardless of the positive or negative emotion they feel. However, they receive 15 Yuan RMB as windfall income, they prefer to use it for hedonic consumption in the positive emotion and for utilitarian consumption in the negative emotion. Studies 2a and 2b attempted to explore the reason of negative emotion can make windfall income turn from hedonic to utilitarian consumption. Study2a found that when people expect to feel guilty about spending windfall income on hedonic consumption, they would avoid hedonic consumption. Study2b found that when people felt guilty about windfall income, they tend to avoid hedonic consumption. Compared with the low guilt level group, the high guilt level group prefers to use windfall income for utilitarian consumption. These results suggest that cognitive and affective tags influence consumer behavior. The influence of cognitive tag on consumer decision presents the "cognition match effect", whereas the influence of affective tag on consumer decision presents the "affect match effect". Both tags also have an interaction effect on consumer decision. Guilt may be a mechanism that results in the negative tag of windfall being preferred for utilitarian consumption.
来源 心理学报 ,2014,46(7):976-986 【核心库】
关键词 心理账户 ; 认知标签 ; 情绪标签 ; 内疚感 ; 享乐规避
地址

1. 暨南大学管理学院, 广州, 510632  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  广东省人文社科重点基地企业发展研究所基金资助
文献收藏号 CSCD:5201792

参考文献 共 40 共2页

1.  Abeler J. Fungibility, labels, and consumption. IZA Discussion Paper No 3500,2008 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Arkes H R. Reference point adaptation: Test in the domain of security trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2008,105:67-81 CSCD被引 5 次    
3.  Arkes H R. The psychology of windfall gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1994,59:331-347 CSCD被引 5 次    
4.  Burnett M S. Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing,1994,11:33-43 CSCD被引 4 次    
5.  Chang H H. Affect as a decision-making system of the present. Journal of Consumer Research,2013,40:42-63 CSCD被引 5 次    
6.  Fishbach A. Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,84:296-309 CSCD被引 12 次    
7.  Garg N. Sadness and consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2013,23:106-113 CSCD被引 3 次    
8.  Kahneman D. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica,1979,47:263-292 CSCD被引 1196 次    
9.  Kivetz R. Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research,2002,39:155-170 CSCD被引 12 次    
10.  Kivetz R. Advances in research on mental accounting and reason-based choice. Marketing Letters,1999,10:249-266 CSCD被引 12 次    
11.  Lascu D N. Consumer guilt: Examining the potential of a new marketing construct. Advances in Consumer Research,1991,18:290-295 CSCD被引 4 次    
12.  Levav J. Emotional accounting: How feelings about money influence consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research,2009,46:66-80 CSCD被引 7 次    
13.  李爱梅. 消费者决策分析的新视角:双通道心理账户理论. 心理科学进展,2012,20:1709-1717 CSCD被引 6 次    
14.  李爱梅. 悲伤消费效应研究综述. 外国经济与管理,2013,35:44-51 CSCD被引 1 次    
15.  李爱梅. 心理账户的非替代性及其运算规则. 心理科学,2004,27:952-954 CSCD被引 6 次    
16.  李爱梅. 心理账户：理论与应用启示. 心理科学进展,2007,15:727-734 CSCD被引 18 次    
17.  李爱梅. 心理账户与薪酬激励效应的实验研究. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,138:80-87 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  李爱梅. 中国人心理账户的内隐结构. 心理学报,2007,39:706-714 CSCD被引 8 次    
19.  李爱梅. 不同的优惠策略对价格感知的影响研究. 心理科学,2008,31:457-460 CSCD被引 2 次    
20.  Lim S S. Do investors integrate losses and segregate gains? Mental accounting and investor trading decisions. Journal of Business,2006,79:2539-2573 CSCD被引 4 次    
引证文献 9 篇

1 李斌 体验性消费与实物性消费的双加工理论模型:现象、机制及影响因素 心理科学进展,2018,26(5):761-769
CSCD被引 5 次

2 张美萱 “电子钱包”让人花钱更多?——手机支付的心理账户效应 心理科学,2018,41(4):904-909
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有9篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号