3~6岁儿童汉字字形认知的发展
Development of Form Recognition of Visual Word in Chinese Children of 3 to 6 Years Old
查看参考文献18篇
|
文摘
|
以汉字、一般线条图、似字线条图和笔画组合为材料,采用字典判断任务考察3~6岁儿童汉字字形认知的发展特点。结果发现儿童辨别汉字与似字符号的能力随年龄增长显著提高。3岁儿童较难区分汉字与各类似字符号。4~5岁儿童对汉字笔画特征有了一定意识。6岁儿童对汉字组合模式的认识显著提高。笔画意识出现较早且发展速度较快,组合模式意识出现较晚且发展速度较慢。5岁和6岁是汉字字形认知发展的重要时期。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The present study aimed to examine the early development the form recognition of the visual word in Chinese children aged from 3 to 6. The four types of stimuli were employed: Chinese characters, stroke combinations, character-like line drawings and line drawings. Each stimulus type consisted of 8 items. Chinese characters were simple or left-right structures with low and high frequencies. Stroke combinations were constructed by randomly recombining the strokes of a Chinese character. Character-like line drawings were formed by transforming the strokes of a Chinese character into vertical and horizontal straight lines. Line drawings were constructed by randomly recombining the lines of a character-like line drawing. Participants were instructed to decide whether an item was a real Chinese character or not. To exclude potential confounding of subjective judgments, we analyzed the discriminative ability (d') according to signal detection theory. Results showed that the main effect of age was significant, F(4,149)=61.99, p<.001, η~2=.63. Results of the post-hoc tests showed that children's discriminative ability was increased with age, p<.01. For hit rate, the main effect of age was not significant, F(4,149)=2.25, p>.05, η~2=.06, whereas for false alarm rate the main effect of age was significant, F(4,149)=85.42, p<.001, η~2=.70. Results showed that the false alarm rate was increased with age, p<.001, suggesting that children's ability to reject the non-character stimuli was enhanced with age. Furthermore, we analyzed the accuracy of judging the three types of non-character stimuli. Results showed that for the three-year-olds, there was no difference between any of the two types of non-character stimuli, ps>.05. For four-and five-year-olds, the accuracy of judging the two types of line drawings was higher than that of the stroke combinations, ps<.001. In addition, the accuracy of judging the two types of line drawings in five-year-olds was higher than that in four-year-olds, ps<.001. For six-year-olds, the accuracy of judging the line drawings was higher than that of the character-like line drawings and the stroke combinations, p<.05, while no difference was found between the character-like line drawings and the stroke combinations, ps>.05. Additionally, there was no difference in the accuracy of judging the two types of line drawings between five-year-olds and six-year-olds, ps>.05. However, the accuracy of judging the stroke combinations in the six-year-olds was higher than that in the five-year-olds, p<.001. In conclusion, the present study provides new evidence that Chinese children develop the awareness of different aspects of the visual word form at an early age even before receiving formal reading training. The discriminative ability is increased with age, and its development is mainly due to the increasing ability to reject non-character stimuli. Age five and age six are the crucial periods of the early development of the form recognition of the visual word. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2014,37(2):357-362 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
汉字
;
字形认知
;
笔画意识
;
组合模式意识
;
发展
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室;;浙江省认知障碍评估技术研究重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5131669
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
|
1.
李娟. 学龄儿童汉语正字法意识发展的研究.
心理学报,2000,32:121-126
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李虹. 汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展.
心理发展与教育,2006,1:35-38
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
莫雷. 幼儿书面语言掌握特点的实验研究.
学前教育研究,2005,7:29-32
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
彭聃龄. 汉字识别中的两种加工.
汉语认知研究,1997:105-138
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
彭聃龄. 汉字部件及其位置的发展研究.
心理与行为研究,2006,4:1-4
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
彭聃龄. 汉字加工的基本单元:来自笔画数效应和部件数效应的证据.
心理学报,1997,29:8-16
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
钱怡. 汉语学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展.
心理学报,2013,45:60-69
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
舒华. 汉语儿童词汇和阅读获得的研究.
汉语认知研究,1997:279-295
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
王效玲.
小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表,1996
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
朱滢. 心理物理学方法.
实验心理学,2004:93
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Chow B W. Dialogic reading and morphology training in Chinese children: Effects on language and literacy.
Developmental Psychology,2008,44:233-244
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Ehri L C. Phases of development in learning to read words.
Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective,1999:79-108
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Ho C S H. Different visual skills are important in learning to read English and Chinese.
Educational and Child Psychology,1999,16:4-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Morrison F J. Education and cognitive development: A natural experiment.
Developmental Psychology,1995,33:789-799
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Pak A. Visual chunking skills of Hong Kong children.
Reading and Writing,2005,18:437-454
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Petersson K M. Cognitive processing in literate and illiterate subjects: A review of some recent behavioral and functional neuroimaging data.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,2001,42:251-267
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Taft M. Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese.
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,1997,23:761-774
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Yin L. Naming writing in Mandarin-speaking children.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2013,116:199-215
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问