帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

A comparative study on the medium-long term results of endovascular repair and open surgical repair in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

查看参考文献48篇

Han Yanshuo 1   Zhang Jian 1 *   Xia Qian 1   Liu Zhimin 1   Zhang Xiaoyu 1   Wu Xiaoyu 1   Lun Yu 1   Xin Shijie 1   Duan Zhiquan 1   Xu Ke 2  
文摘 Background Although it is generally acknowledged that patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) obtain the greatest benefit from endovascular repair (EVAR), convincing evidence on the medium-long term effect is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare and summarize published results of rAAA that underwent EVAR with open surgical repair (OSR). Methods A search of publicly published literature was performed. Based on an inclusion and exclusion criteria, a systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to compare patient characteristics, complications, short term mortality and medium-long term outcomes. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences. A quantitative method was used to analyze the differences between these two methods. Results A search of the published literature showed that fourteen English language papers comprising totally 1213 patients with rAAA (435 EVAR and 778 OSR) would be suitable for this study. Furthermore, 13 Chinese studies were included, including 267 patients with rAAA totally, among which 238 patients received operation. The endovascular method was associated with more respiratory diseases before treatment (OR=1.81, P=0.01), while there are more patients with hemodynamic instability before treatment in OSR group (OR=1.53, P=0.031). Mean blood transfusion was 1328 ml for EVAR and 2809 ml for OSR (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1500 ml, P=0.014). The endovascular method was associated with a shorter stay in intensive care (WMD 2.34 days, P <0.001) and a shorter total post-operative stay (WMD 6.27 days, P <0.001). The pooled post-operative complication rate of respiratory system and visceral ischemia seldom occurred in the EVAR group (OR=0.48, P <0.001 and OR=0.28, P=0.043, respectively). The pooled 30-day mortality was 25.7% for EVAR and 39.6% for OSR, and the odds ratio was 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41?0.70, P <0.001). There was not, however, any significant reduction in the medium-long all-cause mortality rate (HR=1.13, P=0.381) and re-intervention rate (OR= 2.19, P=0.243) following EVAR. In EVAR group, nevertheless, incidence of type I endoleak was significantly lower than type II endoleak (OR=0.33, P=0.039) at late follow-up period. Conclusions On the basis of this systematic review, rAAA EVAR results in less blood use for transfusion, shorter operation time, shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, and lower 30-day mortality. However, in the medium-long term, it is not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality.
来源 Chinese Medical Journal ,2013,126(24):4771-4779 【核心库】
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122076
关键词 aortic aneurysm ; abdominal ; aortic rupture ; endovascular procedures ; medium-long term effect ; meta-analysis
地址

1. Department of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, Shenyang, 110001  

2. Department of Vascular Intervention, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, Shenyang, 110001

语种 英文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0366-6999
学科 医药、卫生
基金 国家自然科学基金 ;  the Department of Education of Liaoning Province (Key Laboratory Project) ;  Ministry of Education of China (Key Research Project of Science and Technology)
文献收藏号 CSCD:5008028

参考文献 共 48 共3页

1.  Moll F L. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2011,41 Suppl 1:s1-s58 CSCD被引 23 次    
2.  Yusuf S W. Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm. Lancet,1994,344:1645 CSCD被引 7 次    
3.  Acosta S. Predictors for outcome after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2007,33:277-284 CSCD被引 2 次    
4.  Ockert S. Early and midterm results after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in a comparative analysis. J Endovasc Ther,2007,14:324-332 CSCD被引 3 次    
5.  Alsac J M. Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2005,30:632-639 CSCD被引 3 次    
6.  Lee W A. Impact of endovascular repair on early outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg,2004,40:211-215 CSCD被引 2 次    
7.  Marin M L. Initial experience with transluminally placed endovascular grafts for the treatment of complex vascular lesions. Ann Surg,1995,222:449-465 CSCD被引 10 次    
8.  Moher D. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet,1999,354:1896-1900 CSCD被引 87 次    
9.  Stroup D F. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA,2000,283:2008-2012 CSCD被引 201 次    
10.  Higgins J P T. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011] The Cochrane Collaboration 2011 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Parmar M K. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med,1998,17:2815-2834 CSCD被引 68 次    
12.  DerSimonian R. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials,1986,7:177-188 CSCD被引 275 次    
13.  Higgins J P. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ,2003,327:557-560 CSCD被引 577 次    
14.  Egger M. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ,1995,311:753-754 CSCD被引 5 次    
15.  Egger M. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ,1997,315:629-634 CSCD被引 595 次    
16.  Chagpar R B. Early mortality following endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Vasc Endovascular Surg,2010,44:645-649 CSCD被引 5 次    
17.  Davenport D L. Thirty-day NSQIP database outcomes of open versus endoluminal repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg,2010,51:305-309 CSCD被引 2 次    
18.  Wibmer A. Improved survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture by offering both open and endovascular repair. Arch Surg,2008,143:544-549 CSCD被引 2 次    
19.  Anain P M. Early and mid-term results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era in a community hospital. J Vasc Surg,2007,46:898-905 CSCD被引 3 次    
20.  Visser J J. Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Clinical outcomes with 1-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg,2006,44:1148-1155 CSCD被引 3 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 韩彦槊 高龄腹主动脉瘤患者治疗方式的选择及疗效比较 中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(12):987-991
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号