行政区区间联系及其空间效应的系统化研究
Systematic research on interregional linkage and its spatial effects
查看参考文献37篇
文摘
|
在空间研究范式转型和行政区经济制约的背景下,行政区区间联系与合作已成为区域竞合的重要空间管治模式。空间结构对城市化进程和生产要素流动具有引导作用,已有研究以实证为主,地域针对性强,但研究系统性有待加强。本文在总结国内外相关研究的基础上,厘清了行政区区间联系及其空间效应的基本研究思路和主要研究方法,形成以城市动力机制、区间联系合作模式、区间联系空间效应和综合结构系统为主要内容的研究框架。由于国内城市的特殊性,开展行政区区间联系及其空间效应的系统化和定量研究,能为城市协同合作和转型提升提供理论依据。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Based on the transformation of spatial research and the limitation of the economy of an administrative region, the linkage and cooperation between different administrative regions have become an important strategy for spatial governance of the interregional relationships. Cooperation has great influences in many regions of Europe, East Asia and North America. Different ways of cooperation are adopted in different regions as regional cooperation is sensitive to space scale. In Europe, as an example, the development of interregional cooperation is going through three stages in Euregios, Cross-border Regions and Cross-border Polycentric Metropolitan Region, respectively. Currently in the cross-border regions in Europe, money and resources have been already ensured for the improvement of the development. Interregional cooperation in North America shows a trend of industrial accumulation near the American borders both in Canada and Mexico. The cooperation in East Asia shows diversified trends to enlarge the economic influences. Spatial structure has specific influences and guidance on the urbanization and production effect flow. The research on spatial structure is divided into four parts: traditional pattern, activity pattern, structure pattern and information pattern. The method to assess the cooperation is based on economy and space. In economy part, border effect is the main research method while ESDA and DEA are the related research method. In space part, planning and governance modes are the main research method. The research method of city spatial structure studies city structure, space influence range, city potential mode and internal space structure, by using different space research methods. Based on related researches on regional cooperation and spatial structure worldwide, this paper attempts to review the thoughts and methodologies in the research on the development of the cooperation and its spatial effect. The focus of space research has changed from stable space to space flow. The research framework is based on the space economy, assuming that everyone is rational and conforms to economy maximum criterion. The research can be divided into four major parts: city's driving mechanism, cooperation, spatial effect and composite structure system. The first part discusses the components of city character, city activities and personal activities. The second part discusses the type, intensity and mode of cooperation. The third part discusses city form and city network. The fourth part discusses the structure cycle and special components. The results show that empirical research is dominant but the system is still lacking in China due to lack of data of relative flow between different administrative regions. The main characters for the research are traditional theories on location and transformation, and the systematic research is needed to improve the related researches on the regional characteristics. The research in China is divided into three topics: regional cooperation, governmental commission and single governmental dominance. The systematic research on regional cooperation's spatial effect can help recognize real developmental conditions and provide a theoretical basis for city cooperation and transformation. |
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2013,32(11):1622-1628 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
区间联系
;
空间效应
;
边界效应
;
系统化研究
|
地址
|
北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 深圳, 518055
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4986131
|
参考文献 共
37
共2页
|
1.
Alonso W. Urban and regional imbalances in economic development.
Economic Development and Cultural Change,1968,17(1):1-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Bialasiewicz L. Re-scaling "EU"rope: EU macro-regional fantasies in the Mediterranean.
European Urban and Regional Studies,2013,20(1):59-76
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
蔡运龙. 地理科学的中国进展与国际趋势.
地理学报,2004,59(6):803-810
|
CSCD被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Castells M. Centrality in the space of flows.
Built Environment,2007,33(4):482-485
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance.
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2008,616(1):78-93
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Chan R. Cross-border regional development in Southern China.
GeoJournal,1998,44(3):225-237
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
陈彦光. 城市系统的异速生长关系与位序—规模法则—对Steindl模型的修正与发展.
地理科学,2001,21(5):412-416
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Ding C. Urban spatial development in the land policy reform era: Evidence from Beijing.
Urban Studies,2004,41(10):1889-1907
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Ding C. Transport development, regional concentration and economic growth.
Urban Studies,2013,50(2):312-328
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
樊杰. 人文-经济地理学在生态文明建设中的学科价值与学术创新.
地理科学进展,2013,32(2):147-160
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
11.
方叶林. 基于PCA-ESDA的中国省域旅游经济时空差异分析.
经济地理,2012,32(8):149-154
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
12.
方远平. 创新要素的空间分布及其对区域创新产出的影响:基于中国省域的ESDA-GWR分析.
经济地理,2012,32(9):8-14
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
13.
冯健. 中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望.
地理科学进展,2003,22(3):304-314
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Fujita M. Spatial competition with a land market: Hotelling and Von Thunen inified.
The Review of Economic Studies,1986,53(5):819-841
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Fujita M. Globalization and the evolution of the supply chain: Who gains and who loses?.
International Economic Review,2006,47(3):811-836
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
顾朝林. 基于重力模型的中国城市体系空间联系与层域划分.
地理研究,2008,27(1):1-12
|
CSCD被引
165
次
|
|
|
|
17.
郭腾云. 基于DEA的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化.
地理学报,2009,64(4):408-416
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Hall P. New trends in European urbanization.
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,1980,451(1):45-51
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Jowett G. Factor analysis.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1958,7(2):114-125
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Kirk W. Problems of geography.
Geography,1963,48(4):357-371
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|