乡村农户适应旅游发展的模式及影响机制——以秦岭金丝峡景区为例
Exploring conditions, determinants and mechanisms of rural households' adaptability to tourism development: A case study of Jinsixia in Qinling Mountains
查看参考文献33篇
文摘
|
社会一生态系统理论为旅游影响与旅游可持续发展研究提供了新的分析思路,已成为国际上旅游研究的重要理论工具。从社会一生态系统适应性出发,借鉴脆弱性研究中的适应性理论,构建农户旅游发展适应性分析框架,以陕西秦岭金丝峡景区为案例,通过实地调查和访谈获取数据,较系统地研究了农户适应旅游发展的行为模式、影响因素及机制。主要结论包括:①旅游业推动小河流域农业商品化,但并未促进农业增长,相反农业生产功能大幅衰退;农户以旅游经营和常年务工作为主要对策,形成了旅游专营型、主导型、均衡兼营型及务工主导型四种适应效果差异显著的适应模式。②农户适应旅游发展的影响因素包括认知因素(机会和政策认知)、劳动力(劳动力总量、聘用人数)、地理区位(可达性与区位优势度)、自然资本(耕地面积)、物质资产(房屋类型)和社会资本(邻里关系)。③旅游开发导致的自然生计资源缺失与农户生存理性之间的矛盾是适应发生的根源,社区补偿制度是重要推动力量;农户社会理性与经济理性偏好决定着其适应模式选择;适应效果受适应力驱动因素影响。最后对旅游影响的社会一生态整合研究有效性进行讨论,并提出后续深化研究的方向和本研究的实践启示。 |
其他语种文摘
|
The social-ecological system, as a thooretical-fvamework, provides an original approach to study of tourism impacts, tourism and rural sustainability. It has been a hot topic in the tourism and rural research for its integrated and dynamic perspective linking social and ecological elements. This paper takes the tourist destination and farmer household in rural areas as a complex social-ecological system, and explores a social-ecological adaptive framework for tourism impacts analysis based on understanding adaptability in the framework of social-ecological resilience and vulnerability. The adaptability here refers to the farmer households' behaviour and ability to adjust livelihood against the tourism impacts. Then, we take the villages near Jinsixia in Qinling Mountains as an example to explore the households' adaptability through analyzing the conditions, determinants and mechanism. The data employed in this paper was collected by household investigation and authoritative interview in August and November, 2011. The results are shown as follows. (1) The agriculture in Jinsixia has declined a lot in the last decade, and the tourism accelerated the marketization of agriculture, but has not improved the agricultural growth. The farmers choose to participate in tourism and migration for jobbing throughout the year as main adapting measures, and hire themselves out in the locality or migrate for jobbing during low season for tourism as auxiliary measures. Based on the differences in adaptive measures, the households can be divided into 4 groups, which are households depending on tourism, majored in tourism,depending on both tourism and migrating for job, and majored in migrating job. (2) The key factors driving adaptability include psychological factors, labor, social capital, location factors, natural and material resources. The indicators driving households' adaptability through the purpose of systematic regimes include farmers' perceptibility of development opportunities from tourism, householder diploma, aggregate of labor, neighborly relations, house types, location predominance. And the indicators driving adaptability through regime stability are as follows; awareness of development opportunities and compensatory system related with tourism, cultivated area, total employment, aggregate on labor force, accessibility of households' location and neighborly relations. (3) The adaptation is a rational choice facing survival pressure which results from tourism, and the compensatory system (Financial Compensation and Policy of Pro-Poor Tourism) is an important push-driver. The adwptive strategy is influenced by the adaptive capacity and social rationality or economic rationality. The results of adaptation are determined by the adaptive capacity, and lead to the fature adaptation and social-ecological system state. Finally, the effectiveness of studying tourism impacts employing the social-ecological adaptation framework is discussed in this paper. The future research directions and adaptive management suggestions for the rural based-tourism are proposed. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2013,68(8):1143-1156 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
旅游
;
社会—生态系统
;
适应性
;
农户
;
秦岭金丝峡
|
地址
|
西北大学城市与环境学院, 西安, 710127
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4936322
|
参考文献 共
33
共2页
|
1.
中国华人民共和国国家旅游局.
全国乡村旅游发展纲要(2009-2015年),2009/2012
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
方创琳. 快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为与调控路径.
地理学报,2007,62(8):849-860
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
3.
蒋依依. 旅游景观生态系统理论.
生态学报,2008,28(4):1786-1793
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Biggs D. Understanding resilience in a vulnerable industry: The case of reef tourism in Australia.
Ecology and Society,2011,16(1)
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
5.
曹新向. 《旅游:变化、影响与机遇》简评.
地理学报,2009,64(6):765
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Korstanje Maximiliano E. A review of "Tourism and Socio-environmental Effects".
Tourism Geographies,2011,13(1):160-163
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Strickland M J. Using resilience concepts to investigate the impacts of protected area tourism on communities.
Annals of Tourism Research,2010,37(2):499-519
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
8.
刘丽梅. 中国社区参与旅游发展研究述评.
地理科学进展,2010,29(8):1018-1024
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Walker B.
Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World,2006
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
10.
王俊. 半干旱区社会--生态系统干旱恢复力的定量化研究.
地理科学进展,2010,29(11):1385-1390
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Walker B. Resilience,adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems.
Ecology and Society,2004,9(2):5-12
|
CSCD被引
182
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Farrell B. Reconceptualizing tourism.
Annals of Tourism Research,2004,31(2):274-295
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Lacitignola D. Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability.
Ecological Modelling,2007,206(1/2):191-204
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Petrosillo I. Indicating fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems.
Ecological Indicators,2006(6):104-113
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Ruiz B E. Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism: An approach from Agua Blanca, Ecuador.
Tourism Management,2010(5):1-12
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Larsen. Governing resilience building in Thailand's tourism-dependent coastal communities: Conceptualizing stakeholder agency in social-ecological systems.
Global Environmental Change,2011,21:481-491
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Trista M. Adaptive environmental management of tourism in the Province of Siena, Italy using the ecological footprint.
Journal of Environmental Management,2008,86:407-418
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Nelson D R. Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2007,32:395-419
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Engle N L. Adaptive capacity and its assessment.
Global Environmental Change,2011,21:647-656
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Ostrom E. Going beyond panaceas.
PNAS,2007,104(39):15176-15178
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|