本土化人格特质与工作绩效的关系:线性与非线性
The Relationships between Indigenous Personality Traits and Job Performance: Linear and Nonlinear
查看参考文献16篇
文摘
|
采用跨文化(中国人)个性测量表(Cross - Cultural [Chinese] Personality Assessment Inventory,简称CPAI - 2)对182名服务企业员工进行本土化人格特质测查,并同时获得其直接上级主管对他/她工作绩效的评定。目的是探讨本土化人格特质与工作绩效之间的关系模式(线性或非线性)。结果表明:和谐性与工作绩效具有正向的线性关系;面子与工作绩效具有倒U曲线关系;人情与工作绩效具有正U曲线关系;其他本土化人格特质与工作绩效的关系均不显著。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Chinese personality traits have unique differences from other cultures due to China's special geography and collectivist cultural background. Therefore, the philosophy of localization was accepted and advocated by more and more Chinese psychologists. Meanwhile, the nonlinear relationships between personality traits and job performance have been found in some studies. These results transformed the traditional top - down strategy into double strategies for the applications of personality tests in the psychology of personnel management. However, there was no research to combine the linear and nonlinear models to examine the relationships between indigenous personality traits and job performance in the Chinese work setting. In the current study, we explored the linear and/or nonlinear relationships between indigenous personality traits and job performance. The participants were 182 service employees from several service industries in Beijing, and the immediate supervisors of the respondents provided ratings of their job performance and returned independently to the interviewers. The ratings of job performance were self - compiled based on job analysis and in - depth interview. Confirmatory factor analysis found that the one - factor performance model had a better fit (X2 = 27.79, df = 8, CFI =.95, NFI =.93, RMSEA =.07), and the coefficient alpha was. 85. Meanwhile, the nine subscales from CPAI - 2 were selected to assess the indigenous personality traits: face (FAC), family orientation (FAM), defensiveness (DEF), graciousness vs. meanness (G_M), veraciousness vs. slickness (V_S), traditionalism vs. modernity (T_M), renqing (REN), harmony (HAR) and thrift vs. extravagance (T_E). The mean Cronbach's coefficient for the entire set of personality scales was. 70 in the representative normal sample in Chinese mainland and Hong Kong. The data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0, and the main statistical methods were correlation analysis and hierarchical polynomial regression analysis. The results were as follow: (1) HAR and job performance had a positive linear relationship(βL =.16, p <. 05), the results were similar to the previous studies, and confirmed the importance of harmonious relationship in Chinese culture. (2) FAC and job performance had a reversed - U curve relationship(βQ = -.22, p <. 05), indicating that compared to those who were low in "face" scores, those scoring high on "face" tended to do well on the job, and therefore were likely to achieve better performance via their personal efforts to 'save face' through hard work. However, after a certain point (ZFAC = -.07), excessively avoiding losing face in advance or mending lost face after the fact may no longer be helpful to score favorably on job performance. (3) REN and job performance had a letter U curve relationship (βQ =.15, p <. 05), indicating that the low and high scores on the renqing scales had a better performance. This is not consistent with our expectation, because of the personality traits and job performance usually showed a reversed - U curve in previous studies. The current results may be due to the special status of renqing in Chinese society. In the end, we pointed out that the results should be repeated in different samples and jobs before generalization can be reached. |
来源
|
心理科学
,2012,35(6):1440-1444 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
人格特质
;
本土化
;
工作绩效
;
线性
;
非线性
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4731824
|
参考文献 共
16
共1页
|
1.
甘怡群. 用中国人个体量表(CPAI)预测国有企业中高层管理者的绩效.
应用心理学杂志,2002,8(3):35-39
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
宋维真. 编制中国人个性测量表(CPAI)的意义与程序.
心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
3.
杨中芳. 试论如何研究中国人的性格.
中国人的心理与行为--理念及方法篇(1992),1993:352-356
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
张建新. 中国人人格结构探索——人格特质六因素假说.
心理科学进展,2006,14(4):574-585
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Barrick M R. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta - analysis.
Personnel Psychology,1991,44(1):1-26
|
CSCD被引
46
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Burch G S J.
Personality as a Predictor of Work - Related Behavior and Performance: Recent Advances and Directions for Future Research,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Cheung F M. Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory.
Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology,1996,27(2):181-199
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Cheung F M. Relevance of openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance.
Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology,2008,39(1):81-108
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Jiang C. Personality traits and job performance in local government organizations in China.
Social Behavior and Personality,2009,37(4):451-458
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Kwong J Y Y. Prediction of performance facets using specific personality traits in the Chinese context.
Journal of Vocational Behavior,2003,63(1):99-110
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
11.
LaHuis D M. Investigating Nonlinear Conscientiousness - Job Performance Relations for Clerical Employees.
Human Performance,2005,18(3):199-212
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Le H. Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2010,11:1-21
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Lun V M C. Achieving relationship harmony in groups and its consequence for group performance.
Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2006,9(3):195-202
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Ting-Toomey S. The Matrix of Face: An Updated Face - Negotiation Theory.
Theorizing about intercultural communication,2005:71-92
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Triandis H C. Cultural influences on personality.
Annual Review of Psychology,2002,53(1):133
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Westerman J W. The Effects of Work Environment on the Personality - Performance Relationship: An Exploratory Study.
Journal of Managerial Issues,2007,19(2):288-305
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|