MRICES: A new model for emission mitigation strategy assessment and its application
查看参考文献39篇
文摘
|
Many global emission reduction strategies have been proposed, but few have been assessed quantitatively from the view of equality, efficiency and effectiveness. Integrated assessment models (IAM) is one of the effective ways to make climate policy modeling. So in this paper we developed the MRICES (Multi-regional integrated model of climate and economy with GDP spillovers) model, which is an IAM but extends to include GDP spillover mechanism, to make assessment on several strategies for global emission reduction, including the egalitarianism strategy, the UNDP strategy and the Copenhagen Accord. Using 1990 as a baseline for historical emission levels, the egalitarian strategy argues that developed countries should implement urgent emission reductions, whereas developing countries are allowed relatively higher future emission quotas. The UNDP strategy addresses the issue of substantial changes in global temperature but acknowledges that developing countries are not able to afford more costs for mitigation measures, which is inequitable from the perspective of a country's right to develop. We also simulated the Copenhagen Accord to determine the consequences by the year 2100 if each country continues their current emission mitigation actions, and results indicated that the increase in global temperature will be 2.8℃ by 2100; consequently, much stronger emission reduction efforts must be implemented after 2020. Based on analysis on mitigation strategies, it is recognized that the common but differentiated responsibility principle must be insisted when making global mitigation strategy. To comply with this principle, the emission reduction baseline of developed and developing countries should be discriminated, so 1990 and 2005 can be taken as the base year for developed and developing countries respectively. |
来源
|
Journal of Geographical Sciences
,2012,22(6):1131-1148 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.1007/s11442-012-0987-1
|
关键词
|
IAM
;
climate change
;
GDP spillover
;
mitigation strategy assessment
|
地址
|
1.
Institute of Policy and Management, CAS, Beijing, 100190
2.
East China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Geographical Information Science, Ministry of State Education of China, Shanghai, 200062
3.
School of Public Policy, George Mason University, USA, Virginia, 22030
|
语种
|
英文 |
ISSN
|
1009-637X |
学科
|
环境污染及其防治 |
基金
|
国家973计划
;
CAS Strategic Priority Research Program
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4695637
|
参考文献 共
39
共2页
|
1.
Baer P.
The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: Greenhouse Development Rights Framework,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
BASIC.
The Sao Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy,2006
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Buonanno P. Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto.
Resource and Energy Economics,2003,25:11-34
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Burniaux J.
GREEN: A Global Model for Quantifying the Cost of Policies to Curb C02 Emissions,1992
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Bussolo M. Global climate change and its distributional impacts.
Paper presented to Eleventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Chen Wenying. Impact of carbon mitigation on China's energy system using China MARKAL-MACRO model.
Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), (in Chinese),2004,44(3):342-346
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Dixon P B.
ORANI: A multisectoral model of the Australian economy,1982
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Eyckmans J. Simulating coalitionally stable burden sharing agreements for the climate change problem.
Resource and Energy Economics,2003,25:299-327
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Golombek R. Climate policy under technology spillover.
Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,31(2):201-227
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Grubb M J. Climatic implications of the Kyoto Protocol: The contribution of international spillover.
Climatic Change,2002,54:11-28
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Jha R. The global financial crisis and short-run prospects for India.
ASARC Working Paper,2009
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Jiang Kejun.
Countermeasure analysis on climate change. (in Chinese),2002
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Kelly D L. Integrated assessment models for climate change control.
The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000,1999:171-197
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Kemfert G. Induced technological change in a multi-regional, multi-sectoral integrated assessment model.
Ecological Economics,2005,54:293-305
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Link P M. Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the Thermohaline Circulation: An application of FUND.
Portuguese Economic Journal,2004,3(2):99-114
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Liu Ligang. Impact of the global financial crisis on China: Empirical evidence and policy implications.
China & World Economy,2009,17(6):1-23
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Loulou R. ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model (Part I): Model structure.
Computational Management Science,2007,5:7-40
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Loulou R. ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model (Part II): Mathematical formulation.
Computational Management Science,2008,5:41-66
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Luh Y. International spillovers and East Asian growth: The experience of Japan, Korea and Taiwan.
Applied Economics letters,2006,13(11):745-750
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Manne A S. MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies.
Energy Policy,1995,23(1):17-34
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|