DEM误差对滑坡危险性评价模型的影响
Effect of DEM Error on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Models
查看参考文献22篇
|
文摘
|
基于数字高程模型(DEM)计算得到的坡度、坡向等地形属性是滑坡危险性评价模型的重要输入数据,DEM误差会导致地形属性计算结果不确定性,进而影响滑坡危险性评价模型的结果。本文选择基于专家知识的滑坡危险性评价模型和逻辑斯第回归模型,采用蒙特卡洛模拟方法,研究DEM误差所导致的滑坡危险性评价模型结果不确定性。研究区位于长江中上游的重庆开县,采用5m分辨率的DEM,以序贯高斯模拟方法模拟了不同大小(误差标准差为1m、7.5m、15m)和空间自相关性(变程为0m、30m、60m、120m)的12类DEM误差场参与滑坡危险性评价。每次模拟包括100个实现,通过对每次模拟分别计算滑坡危险性评价结果的标准差图层和分类一致性百分比图层,用以评价结果不确定性。评价结果表明,在不同的DEM精度下,两个滑坡危险性评价模型所得结果的总体不确定性随空间自相关程度的变化趋势并不相同。当DEM空间自相关性程度不同时,基于专家知识的滑坡危险性评价模型的评价结果总体不确定随着DEM误差增加而呈现不同的变化趋势,而逻辑斯第回归模型的评价结果总体不确定性随着DEM误差大小增加而单调增加。从评价结果总体不确定性角度而言,总体上逻辑斯第回归模型比基于专家知识的滑坡危险性评价模型更加依赖于DEM数据质量。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Terrain attributes (such as slope gradient and slope aspect) computed from a gridded digital elevation model (DEM) are important input data for landslide susceptibility mapping. Elevation error in DEM can cause uncertainty in terrain attributes and further influence landslide susceptibility mapping. However little research has concerned about this issue. This paper studies this issue by a Monte Carlo simulation method for an expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping and the logistic regression model, which are chosen as representatives of two main types of current landslide susceptibility mapping models, i.e. the ex-pert-knowledge-based models and the multivariate statistical models. The study area is located in the Kaixian County of Chongqing Municipality, and belongs to the middle-upper reaches of the Yangtze River, China. The grid size of DEM is 5 m. Sequential Gaussian simulation was conducted to simulate a total of 12 DEM error fields with combinations of three error magnitudes (i.e., standard deviation values are 1, 7.5, and 15 m) and four spatial autocorrelation levels of elevation error (i.e., range values are 0, 30, 60, and 120 m). Each simulation included 100 realizations. Overall uncertainty of each landslide susceptibility mapping model associated with each simulated DEM error field was evaluated based on both a map of standard deviation of resulted landslide susceptibility from the simulation and a percentage map of classification consistency of landslide susceptibility from the simulation. The uncertainty assessment shows that the trends of the overall uncertainty of either landslide susceptibility mapping model changed with the spatial autocorrelation level of simulated DEM error are different under each simulated error magnitude. The trends of the overall uncertainty of expert knowledge-based model changed with increasing error magnitude are different under different spatial autocorrelation levels of simulated DEM error, while the overall uncertainty of logistic regression model monotonously increases as the magnitude of simulated DEM error increases. In general, the overall uncertainty of logistic regression model is more sensitive to DEM error magnitude than expert knowledge-based model. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2012,31(10):1326-1333 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
数字高程模型(DEM)
;
误差
;
滑坡危险性评价
;
蒙特卡洛模拟
;
不确定性
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
地质学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中科院地理资源所优秀青年人才基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4689787
|
参考文献 共
22
共2页
|
|
1.
Dai F C. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong.
Geomorphology,2002,42(3/4):213-228
|
CSCD被引
86
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
OFDA/CRED.
EM-DAT International Disaster Database,2007
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
宋杨. 密云水库周边山区滑坡泥石流易发区预估.
地理科学进展,2011,30(3):343-351
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Finlay P J. The relationship between the probability of landslide occurrence and rainfall.
Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1997,34(6):811-824
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
殷坤龙. 滑坡灾害空间区划及GIS应用研究.
地学前缘,2001,8(2):279-284
|
CSCD被引
106
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Dai F C. Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview.
Engineering Geology,2002,64(1):65-87
|
CSCD被引
145
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Carrara A. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1991,16(5):427-445
|
CSCD被引
80
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
朱阿兴. 基于专家知识的滑坡危险性模糊评估方法.
地理科学进展,2006,25(4):1-12
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Wang R X.
An Expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and fuzzy logic,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Dai F C. Frequency-volume relation and prediction of rainfall- induced landslides.
Engineering Geology,2001,59(3/4):253-266
|
CSCD被引
60
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
陶舒. 基于信息量与逻辑回归模型的次生滑坡灾害敏感性评价----以汶川县北部为例.
地理研究,2010,29(9):1594-1605
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
乔建平. 采用本底因子贡献率法的三峡库区滑坡危险度区划.
山地学报,2006,24(5):569-573
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Zhu A X. Mapping landslide susceptibility in the Three Gorges area, China using GIS, expert knowledge and fuzzy logic.
GIS and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, Water Resources and Environment, IAHS Publication 289 (IAHS Red Book),2004:385-391
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
乔建平. GIS与人工智能结合下的三维可视化滑坡危险度评价.
中国科学:E辑,2003,33(增刊):79-84
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Wood J D.
The Geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation models,1996
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
秦承志. 简化数字地形分析软件(SimDTA)及其应用——以嫩江流域鹤山农场区的坡位模糊分类为例.
地球信息科学学报,2009,11(6):737-743
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Wrigley N.
Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists,1985
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Upton G J G.
Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Volume 2: Categorical and Directional Data,1989
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Dobson A J.
An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models,1990
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
赵彦峰. Kriging插值和序贯高斯条件模拟算法的对比分析.
地球信息科学学报,2010,12(6):767-776
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问