帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

中国传统农区过去300年耕地重建结果的对比分析
Comparisons of Reconstructed Cropland Area from Multiple Datasets for the Traditional Cultivated Region of China in the Last 300 Years

查看参考文献29篇

文摘 土地覆被变化是气候与生态效应模拟研究的重要参量。SAGE和HYDE两个全球历史土地利用数据集在相关研究中得到广泛应用,但在区域尺度上的应用,其可靠性如何,至今少有论及。以我国学者重建的传统农区历史耕地数据集(CHCD)为基础,从全区、省区和网格(60km×60km)三个空间尺度,对SAGE(2010)和HYDE3.1数据集中有关中国传统农区历史耕地重建结果进行对比分析,结果表明:(1)SAGE(2010)数据集对中国传统农区耕地数量重建是以单一线性插补而得,其中1700-1950年是以0.51%的年均增长率线性递增,1950年后是以0.34%年均速率线性递减,这种"标准化"变化趋势不能客观反映传统农区土地垦殖的真实历史,耕地面积也明显高估,与CHCD数据集不具有可比性;(2)HYDE3.1数据集吸纳了区域性研究成果,使其在总量上与CHCD数据集较为接近,具有较好的可比性,但其在省区和网格尺度上与CHCD存在显著差异,其中相对差异率超过70%(<-70%或>70%)的网格占比高达56%~63%,超过90%(<-90%或>90%)的网格占比也高达40%~45%;而相对差异率介于-10%~10%的网格占比仅为5%~6%,介于-30%~30%的网格占比也仅为17%左右;(3)充分利用我国丰富的历史文献,建立更高精度的中国区域历史土地利用数据集,是提高区域气候与生态效应模拟研究质量的重要保障。
其他语种文摘 Land cover change is an important boundary condition in climate and ecological simulations.Although they have been widely used in researches,SAGE and HYDE,the two global scale historical land use datasets,have been rarely discussed about their rationality and accuracy in regional scale.On the basis of CHCD,the historical cropland dataset of traditional cultivated region of China(TCRC,hereafter) which was established by Chinese scholars,we analyzed the rationality and accuracy of TCRC part of SAGE(2010) and HYDE3.1 by comparing them with CHCD in the whole study area scale,provincial scale and 60 km × 60 km grid cell scale.The results indicated that(1) TCRC part of SAGE(2010) dataset was established by linear interpolation and the average annual growth rate was 0.51% from 1700 to 1950 and-0.34% after 1950.The normalized trend could not reflect TCRC’s history of cultivation,and the estimation of cropland area was obviously high compared with CHCD dataset.(2) In comparison of more regional research results,HYDE3.1 dataset was very close to CHCD dataset in the whole study area scale.However,there were significant differences between HYDE3.1 and CHCD in provincial and 60 km×60 km grid cell scales.The percentages of grid cells whose relative differences are greater than 70%(<-70% or > 70%) and 90%(<-90% or >90%) were 56% ~63% and 40% ~45% respectively while those whose relative difference ranges from-10% to 10% and from-30% to 30% were only 5%~ 6% and about 17%,respectively.(3) Making full use of abundant historical archives in China and establishing historical land use dataset of China with high accuracy are significant ways of improving the quality of climate and ecological simulation results.
来源 地理学报 ,2012,67(9):1190-1200 【核心库】
关键词 耕地数据集 ; 分析对比 ; 中国传统农区 ; 过去300年
地址

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家重大科学研究计划 ;  国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4628966

参考文献 共 29 共2页

1.  Thompson R S. BIOME 300: Understanding the impacts of human activities on land cover over the past 300 years. IGBP Newsletter,2000,43:2-3 CSCD被引 6    
2.  叶笃正. 全球变化科学领域的若干研究进展. 中国科学院院刊,2004,19(5):336-341 CSCD被引 15    
3.  Foley J A. Global consequences of land use. Science,2005,309(5734):570-574 CSCD被引 716    
4.  Feddema J J. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science,2005,310(5754):1674-1678 CSCD被引 85    
5.  Voldoire A. Climate simulation of the twenty-first century with interactive land-use changes. Climate Dynamics,2007,29(2):177-193 CSCD被引 19    
6.  石正国. 人类土地利用的历史变化对气候的影响. 科学通报,2007,52(12):1436-1444 CSCD被引 13    
7.  Ramankutty N. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1999,13(4):997-1027 CSCD被引 157    
8.  Goldewijk K K. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2001,15(2):417-433 CSCD被引 86    
9.  Bicik I. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy,2001,18(1):65-73 CSCD被引 12    
10.  Hamre L N. Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landscape Ecology,2007,22(10):1563-1574 CSCD被引 7    
11.  葛全胜. 过去300年中国部分省区耕地资源数量变化及驱动因素分析. 自然科学进展,2003,13(8):825-832 CSCD被引 55    
12.  叶瑜. 东北地区过去300年耕地覆盖变化. 中国科学: D辑,2009,39(3):340-350 CSCD被引 60    
13.  Brovkin V. Role of land cover changes for atmospheric CO2 increase and climate change during the last 150 years. Global Change Biology,2004,10(8):1253-1266 CSCD被引 32    
14.  Matthews H D. Radiative forcing of climate by historical land cover change. Geophysical Research Letters,2003,30(2):1055-1059 CSCD被引 6    
15.  李巧萍. 中国近代土地利用变化对区域气候影响的数值模拟. 气象学报,2006,64(3):257-270 CSCD被引 37    
16.  陈星. 地表植被改变对气候变化影响的模拟研究. 地球科学进展,2006,21(10):1075-1082 CSCD被引 14    
17.  Leemans R. Developing a fast-track global database of land-cover history. LUCC Newsletter,5:6-7 CSCD被引 1    
18.  李蓓蓓. 全球土地利用数据集精度的区域评估——以中国东北地区为例. 中国科学. 地球科学,2010,40(8):1048-1059 CSCD被引 34    
19.  Ramankutty N. ISLSCP II historical croplands cover, 1700-1992. ISLSCP Initiative II Collection,2010:1-20 CSCD被引 5    
20.  Houghton R A. Continental scale estimates of the biotic carbon flux from land cover change: 1850-1980,1995 CSCD被引 1    
引证文献 26

1 张丽娟 19世纪末黑龙江省的耕地覆盖重建 地理学报,2014,69(4):448-458
CSCD被引 13

2 曹雪 近300年中国耕地数据集重建与耕地变化分析 地理学报,2014,69(7):896-906
CSCD被引 22

显示所有26篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号