渭河关中段水文情势改变程度分析
Hydrologic Alteration Analysis in the Guanzhong Reach of the Weihe River
查看参考文献30篇
文摘
|
利用林家村、魏家堡、咸阳、临潼和华县5个水文站资料,借助有序聚类分析法检测渭河流域关中段流量突变点,并在此基础上采用变化范围法(RVA)分析渭河流域关中段的水文情势改变程度,定量评价变化程度较高的水文参数。突变点分析表明,渭河关中段径流在1986年发生突变,可以认为1958—1985年水文情势受人类活动影响较小,近似天然状态。对1986年前后两个时期的水文情势进行对比分析,结果表明,5个水文站中不同的水文参数改变程度不同。总体来看,5个站点的水文情势均发生较为显著的改变,其中林家村、魏家堡和咸阳3个站点差异最显著,主要是受宝鸡峡引渭工程的影响。通过对人类活动影响前后水文情势对比分析,更加深入了解目前渭河水文情势状况,为进一步计算生态基流提供科学依据。 |
其他语种文摘
|
The Guanzhong Reach is the center of Weihe River Basin,and ecosystem has been disturbed greatly,which impact the economic development in this area.Flow data at Linjiacun,Weijiabao,Xianyang,Lintong and Huaxian stations of the Weihe River are analyzed in this paper,which are the most important stations in the Guanzhong Reach of the Weihe River.Change points are detected by using Sequential Cluster Analysis.Based on the change point analysis,the degrees of hydrologic alteration are analyzed by RVA(Range of Variability Approach) method,and hydrologic parameters that have altered greatly are determined.Results show that the change points are detected in 1986.It implies that the hydrologic regime before 1986 may be more close to natural state,while the hydrologic regime after 1986 has changed greatly because of intense human activity.Supposed that the hydrologic series before 1986 represents the hydrologic regime of pre-impact period,and that after 1986 for post-impact period.According to range of variability analysis,different hydrologic parameters show different alterations.On the whole,the hydrologic regime at five stations has changed obviously,especially that at Linjiacun,Weijiabao and Xianyang stations.These analyses facilitate understanding of hydrologic alteration in the Weihe River,and may be helpful for estimation of environmental flow. |
来源
|
自然资源学报
,2012,27(7):1124-1137 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
变化范围法
;
水文情势
;
突变点
;
水文改变程度
|
地址
|
北京师范大学水科学研究院, 水沙科学教育部重点实验室, 北京, 100875
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-3037 |
学科
|
地球物理学 |
基金
|
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项
;
科技部中瑞国际合作项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4590060
|
参考文献 共
30
共2页
|
1.
Richter Brian D. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations.
Ecology and Society,2007,12(1):12
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Richter B D. Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity.
Ecological Applications,2003,13(1):206-224
|
CSCD被引
55
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Bunn S E. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.
Environmental Management,2002,30(4):492-507
|
CSCD被引
63
次
|
|
|
|
4.
LeRoy Poff N. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration.
BioScience,1997,47(11):769-784
|
CSCD被引
141
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Richter Brian D. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers.
Conservation Biology,2000,14(5):1467-1478
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Norris Richard H. What is river health?.
Freshwater Biology,1999,41:197-209
|
CSCD被引
65
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Richter Brian D. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network.
Regulated Rivers: Research & Management,1998,14:329-340
|
CSCD被引
89
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Gippel Christopher J. An assetbased, holistic, environmental flows assessment approach.
Water Resources Development,2009,25(2):301-330
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Galat David L. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: Historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River.
Hydrobiologia,2000,422/423:29-48
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Koel Todd M. Historical patterns of river stage and fish communities as criteria for operations of dams on the Illinois River.
River Research and Applications,2002,18:3-19
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Matteau Martin. Application of multivariate statistical analysis methods to the dam hydrologic impact studies.
Journal of Hydrology,2009,371(1/4):120-128
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
MoranTejeda Enrique. River regimes and recent hydrological changes in the Duero basin(Spain).
Journal of Hydrology,2011,404(3/4):241-258
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Shiau JenqTzong. Feasible diversion and instream flow release using Range of Variability Approach.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,2004,130(5):395-404
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Yang Tao. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration caused by dam construction in the middle and lower Yellow River, China.
Hydrological Processes,2008,22:3829-3843
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
15.
杨娜. 建坝对下游河道水文情势影响RVA评价方法的改进.
长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(5):560-565
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
16.
张洪波. 基于RVA的水库工程对河流水文条件的影响评价.
西安理工大学学报,2008,24(3):262-267
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
17.
张洪波. 宝鸡峡引水对渭河水文规律及生态系统的影响.
西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(4):226-234
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
18.
王菊翠. 渭河(陕西段)河道生态需水量估算.
干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(6):91-94
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Song J X. Ecological and environmental instream flow requirements for the Wei River-The largest tributary of the Yellow River.
Hydrological Processes,2007,21:1066-1073
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
20.
宋进喜. 渭河(陕西段)河道自净需水量研究.
地理科学,2005,25(3):310316
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|