帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

渭河关中段水文情势改变程度分析
Hydrologic Alteration Analysis in the Guanzhong Reach of the Weihe River

查看参考文献30篇

文摘 利用林家村、魏家堡、咸阳、临潼和华县5个水文站资料,借助有序聚类分析法检测渭河流域关中段流量突变点,并在此基础上采用变化范围法(RVA)分析渭河流域关中段的水文情势改变程度,定量评价变化程度较高的水文参数。突变点分析表明,渭河关中段径流在1986年发生突变,可以认为1958—1985年水文情势受人类活动影响较小,近似天然状态。对1986年前后两个时期的水文情势进行对比分析,结果表明,5个水文站中不同的水文参数改变程度不同。总体来看,5个站点的水文情势均发生较为显著的改变,其中林家村、魏家堡和咸阳3个站点差异最显著,主要是受宝鸡峡引渭工程的影响。通过对人类活动影响前后水文情势对比分析,更加深入了解目前渭河水文情势状况,为进一步计算生态基流提供科学依据。
其他语种文摘 The Guanzhong Reach is the center of Weihe River Basin,and ecosystem has been disturbed greatly,which impact the economic development in this area.Flow data at Linjiacun,Weijiabao,Xianyang,Lintong and Huaxian stations of the Weihe River are analyzed in this paper,which are the most important stations in the Guanzhong Reach of the Weihe River.Change points are detected by using Sequential Cluster Analysis.Based on the change point analysis,the degrees of hydrologic alteration are analyzed by RVA(Range of Variability Approach) method,and hydrologic parameters that have altered greatly are determined.Results show that the change points are detected in 1986.It implies that the hydrologic regime before 1986 may be more close to natural state,while the hydrologic regime after 1986 has changed greatly because of intense human activity.Supposed that the hydrologic series before 1986 represents the hydrologic regime of pre-impact period,and that after 1986 for post-impact period.According to range of variability analysis,different hydrologic parameters show different alterations.On the whole,the hydrologic regime at five stations has changed obviously,especially that at Linjiacun,Weijiabao and Xianyang stations.These analyses facilitate understanding of hydrologic alteration in the Weihe River,and may be helpful for estimation of environmental flow.
来源 自然资源学报 ,2012,27(7):1124-1137 【核心库】
关键词 变化范围法 ; 水文情势 ; 突变点 ; 水文改变程度
地址

北京师范大学水科学研究院, 水沙科学教育部重点实验室, 北京, 100875

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-3037
学科 地球物理学
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项 ;  科技部中瑞国际合作项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4590060

参考文献 共 30 共2页

1.  Richter Brian D. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society,2007,12(1):12 CSCD被引 19    
2.  Richter B D. Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications,2003,13(1):206-224 CSCD被引 55    
3.  Bunn S E. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management,2002,30(4):492-507 CSCD被引 63    
4.  LeRoy Poff N. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience,1997,47(11):769-784 CSCD被引 141    
5.  Richter Brian D. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology,2000,14(5):1467-1478 CSCD被引 3    
6.  Norris Richard H. What is river health?. Freshwater Biology,1999,41:197-209 CSCD被引 65    
7.  Richter Brian D. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management,1998,14:329-340 CSCD被引 89    
8.  Gippel Christopher J. An assetbased, holistic, environmental flows assessment approach. Water Resources Development,2009,25(2):301-330 CSCD被引 6    
9.  Galat David L. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: Historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. Hydrobiologia,2000,422/423:29-48 CSCD被引 2    
10.  Koel Todd M. Historical patterns of river stage and fish communities as criteria for operations of dams on the Illinois River. River Research and Applications,2002,18:3-19 CSCD被引 12    
11.  Matteau Martin. Application of multivariate statistical analysis methods to the dam hydrologic impact studies. Journal of Hydrology,2009,371(1/4):120-128 CSCD被引 3    
12.  MoranTejeda Enrique. River regimes and recent hydrological changes in the Duero basin(Spain). Journal of Hydrology,2011,404(3/4):241-258 CSCD被引 1    
13.  Shiau JenqTzong. Feasible diversion and instream flow release using Range of Variability Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,2004,130(5):395-404 CSCD被引 23    
14.  Yang Tao. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration caused by dam construction in the middle and lower Yellow River, China. Hydrological Processes,2008,22:3829-3843 CSCD被引 27    
15.  杨娜. 建坝对下游河道水文情势影响RVA评价方法的改进. 长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(5):560-565 CSCD被引 11    
16.  张洪波. 基于RVA的水库工程对河流水文条件的影响评价. 西安理工大学学报,2008,24(3):262-267 CSCD被引 16    
17.  张洪波. 宝鸡峡引水对渭河水文规律及生态系统的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(4):226-234 CSCD被引 15    
18.  王菊翠. 渭河(陕西段)河道生态需水量估算. 干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(6):91-94 CSCD被引 4    
19.  Song J X. Ecological and environmental instream flow requirements for the Wei River-The largest tributary of the Yellow River. Hydrological Processes,2007,21:1066-1073 CSCD被引 14    
20.  宋进喜. 渭河(陕西段)河道自净需水量研究. 地理科学,2005,25(3):310316 CSCD被引 1    
引证文献 11

1 武玮 渭河流域鱼类群落结构特征及其受环境因子的影响分析 环境科学学报,2014,34(5):1298-1308
CSCD被引 9

2 武玮 渭河流域鱼类群落结构特征及其完整性评价 环境科学研究,2014,27(9):981-989
CSCD被引 21

显示所有11篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号