多灾种综合风险评估软层次模型
Soft Hierarchical Model of Integrated Risk Assessment for Multi-hazards:Taking Earthquake and Flood Disasters in Lijiang,Yunnan as a Case Study
查看参考文献27篇
|
文摘
|
在复杂的灾害风险系统中,风险并非简单相加,但目前的研究成果基本是单一灾种简单相加得到的综合风险,缺乏可靠性。因此,此研究基于灾害风险系统理论,引入模糊信息粒化方法和模糊转化函数,利用模糊近似推理理论和方法,建立一个多灾种综合风险评估软层次模型。研究表明该模型的优势:1)不仅考虑了灾害风险系统中的确定性,而且还包括了随机不确定性和模糊不确定性;2)利用模糊信息粒化方法不仅减少了数据的不确定性,而且还包括了一些主观信息,使得评估结果更加接近实际,理论与实际紧密结合,更有利于风险管理者和决策者为减少损失规避风险提供依据;3)通过模糊转化函数将不同灾种得到的不同量纲的量转化同一量纲的量,以便于综合分析和模糊近似推理,获得多灾种综合风险。以云南省丽江地区(市)的地震-洪水灾害为例,验证多灾种综合风险评估软层次模型的实用性,并将其结果与世界银行灾害管理中心和哥伦比亚大学灾害和风险研究中心所建议的风险评估模型(HMU-CHRR模型)的结果进行比较分析,讨论了本研究所建模型在多灾种综合风险评估中的特点。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Integrated risk assessment is one of the important parts of integrated risk management,which can help governments to take maeasures on preventing and mitigating the losses of disasters.What’s more,multi-hazards integrated risk assessment is currently very important and difficult in the field of disaster reduction at home and abroad,with the systematic theory and methodology not yet obtained.Based on the system theory of disaster risk,this study has introduced the methods of fuzzy information granulation and fuzzy transformation function,and built a soft hierarchical model of integrated risk assessment for multi-hazards,which is characterized by the following aspects.1) Not only the certainty of disaster risk,but also the random uncertainty and fuzzy uncertainty are considered.2) The approach of fuzzy information granulation can reduce the uncertainty of data,and it includes some subjective information so as to make the results of assessment more realistic,theory and practice more tightly combined,and thus,it is more conducive to risk managers and decision makers to provide the basis of loss reduction and risk aversion.3) Fuzzy transformation function transforms different types of quantity into the same type of quantity in order to comprehensively analyze and obtain the assessment result of multi-hazards integrated risk.Using earthquake-flood disaster risk as a case study,the demonstration analysis of soft hierarchical model of integrated risk assessment for earthquake-flood disaster illustrates that this soft hierarchical model suggested in this study holds the ability of synthetically assessing multiple disasters. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2012,31(3):353-360 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
模糊信息粒
;
模糊转化函数
;
地震风险
;
洪水风险
;
模糊近似推理
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
北京师范大学减灾与应急管理研究院, 北京, 100875
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
灾害及其防治 |
|
基金
|
国家科技支撑计划项目
;
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4491894
|
参考文献 共
27
共2页
|
|
1.
Fikse J. Probabilistic methods for risk assessment.
Risk Analysis,1982,2(1):1-8
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Dilley M.
Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis,2005:1-132
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Dilley M.
Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis Synthesis Report,2005:1-29
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Pelling M.
United Nations Development Programme. A global report reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development,2004:1-146
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Pelling M.
Visions of Risk: A Review of International Indicators of Disaster Risk and its Management. ISDR /UNDP: Kingps College,2004:1-56
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Cardona O D. Indicators of disaster risk and risk management Summary report for WCDR.
Program for Latin America and the Caribbean IADB -UNC/IDEA,2005:1-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Cardona O D. Indicators of disaster risk and risk management main technical report.
Program for Latin America and the Caribbean IADBUNC/IDEA,World Bank,2005:1-216
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Mosquera-Machado S. A comparison of selected global disaster risk assessment results.
Natural Hazards,2009,48(3):439-456
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Chen Y M. Requirements and Functional Analysis of a Multi-Hazard Disaster-Risk Analysis System.
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2010,16(2):413-428
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Thierry P. Multi-hazard risk mapping and assessment on an active volcano: the GRINP project at Mount Cameroon.
Natural Hazards,2008,45(3):429-456
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
颜兆林. 概率风险评价系统.
计算机应用研究,2001(2):40-42
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
陈报章. 自然灾害风险损失等级评估的初步研究.
灾害学,2010,25(3):1-5
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
尹占娥. 基于小尺度的城市暴雨内涝灾害情景模拟与风险评估.
地理学报,2010,65(5):553-562
|
CSCD被引
90
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
殷杰. 上海市灾害综合风险定量评估研究.
地理科学,2009,29(3):450-454
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
葛全胜.
中国自然灾害风险综合评估初步研究,2008
|
CSCD被引
94
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Bedford T.
Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Adrian V G.
Risk Engingeering,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
黄崇福.
自然灾害风险评价：理论与实践,2005
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Huang C F.
Towards Efficient Fuzzy Information Processing: Using the Principle of Information Diffusion,2002
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
任鲁川. 区域自然灾害风险分析研究进展.
地球科学进展,1999,14(3):242-246
|
CSCD被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问