安徽省池州市2001~2010年可持续发展动态测度与分析
Dynamic calculation and analysis of sustainable development of Chizhou City in Anhui Province during 2001-2010
查看参考文献36篇
文摘
|
安徽池州市是国家首个生态经济示范区,近十年来,城镇化、工业化水平的快速提升加剧了其发展的风险性和不稳定性,可持续发展面临较大挑战。基于生态足迹模型,对池州市2001~2010年生态足迹供给与需求进行了时间序列测度与分析,利用灰色GM(1,1)模型对2015年、2020年人均生态足迹进行了预测。结果表明:池州市人均生态足迹由2001年的1.2458hm~2/人上升至2010年的2.2483hm~2/人,年平均增长11.14%,人均生态赤字由0.8445hm~2/人扩大至2010年的1.8266hm~2/人;居民消费水平、能源消费量与人均生态足迹相关系数分别为0.844、0.945,为生态足迹驱动因素;研究时段内,能源生态足迹年均增长速度为83.75%,明显快于生物资源生态足迹增长速度;万元GDP生态足迹由2001年的2.98hm~2/万元下降至2010年的1.20hm~2/万元。预测2015年人均生态足迹为3.2336hm~2/人,生态赤字将增至2.7926hm~2/人;2020年人均生态足迹为4.4896hm~2/人,生态赤字将扩大到4.0308hm~2/人。针对池州生态不安全的现状,从减少能源消费、改变消费方式、提高农作物单产等方面提出了减少生态足迹的政策建议。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Chizhou is the first eco-economy demonstration area in Anhui Province.The rapid growth of national economy has aggravated the fragility and instability of the urban development in recent years,hence there are more chances and challenges for sustainable economic development.Based on analytical method of ecological footprint,we measured time sequence of ecological footprint and ecological capacity of Chizhou city from 2001 to 2010.Using GM,the eco-footprint per capita in 2015 and 2020 is predicted.The investigation shows that eco-footprint per capita of the city increased from 1.2458 hm~2 to 2.2483 hm~2,an annual rate of 11.14%,and the eco-deficit per capita increased from 0.8445 hm~2 to 1.8266 hm~2.The correlation coefficient between the consumption level of residents and eco-footprint per capita is about 0.844,and the correlation coefficient between the energy consumption and eco-footprint per capita is about 0.945,so the consumption level of residents and energy consumption are factors affecting eco-footprint.Energy ecological footprint has been increasing consecutively at an annual rate of 83.75%,which even surpassed the growth rates of biological footprint.Eco-footprint per ten thousand yuan GDP decreased from 2.98 hm~2 in 2001 to 1.20 hm~2 in 2010.This paper predicts that by the year 2015,the eco-footprint per capita will be 3.2336 hm~2,and the ecological deficit per capita will be increased to 2.7926 hm~2.By the year 2020,the eco-footprint per capita will be 4.4896 hm~2,and the ecological deficit per capita will increase to 4.0308 hm~2.Considering the unstable eco-situation in Chizhou,we propose several measures to reduce eco-footprint,including decreasing energy consumption,developing eco-tourism,changing people’s consumption style,and raising crop yields. |
来源
|
地理研究
,2012,31(3):439-449 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
生态足迹
;
生态承载力
;
动态测度
;
可持续发展
;
池州
|
地址
|
1.
池州学院资源环境与旅游系, 池州, 247000
2.
池州学院经济贸易系, 池州, 247000
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-0585 |
学科
|
社会与环境 |
基金
|
安徽省教育厅重点研究课题
;
国家自然科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4490584
|
参考文献 共
36
共2页
|
1.
郭秀锐. 城市生态足迹计算与分析-以广州为例.
地理研究,2003,22(5):654-662
|
CSCD被引
93
次
|
|
|
|
2.
常斌. 基于空间的生态足迹与生态承载力预测模型——以甘肃省河西走廊地区为例.
地理研究,2007,26(5):940-948
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
3.
方恺. 生态足迹理论在能源消费评价中的缺陷与改进探讨.
自然资源学报,2010,25(6):1013-1021
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
4.
徐中民. 生态足迹方法的理论解析.
中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(6):69-78
|
CSCD被引
97
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:What urban economics leaves out.
Environ Urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130
|
CSCD被引
562
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Wackernagel M.
Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth,1996
|
CSCD被引
163
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprint Accounts for Advancing Sustainability:Measuring Human Demands on Nature.
Sustainable Development Indicators in Ecological Economics,2006:247-267
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Wackernagel M. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy.
Proceedings of the Natlional Academy of Sciences,2002,99:9266-9271
|
CSCD被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprints of Nations:How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do They Have?.
Costa Rica:The Earth Council,1997
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Simmons C. Two feet-two approaches:A component-based model of ecological footprint.
Ecological Economics,2000,32(3):375-380
|
CSCD被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Bicknell K B. New methodology for the ecological foot print with an application to the New Zealand economy.
Ecological Economics,1998,27(2):149-160
|
CSCD被引
100
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Ferng Jiun-Jiun. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints.
Ecological Economics,2002,40(1):53-69
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Lenzen M. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia.
Ecological Economics,2001,37(2):229-255
|
CSCD被引
98
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Senbel M. The ecological footprint:A non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America.
Global Environmental Change:Human and Policy Dimensions,2003,13(2):83-100
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Wackernagel M. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept.
Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390
|
CSCD被引
624
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Wackernagel M. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint:Applications in Sweden and Subregions.
AMBIO,1999,28(7):604-612
|
CSCD被引
117
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Erb K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926~2000:A variation on ecological footprint assessments.
Land Use Policy,2004,21(3):247-259
|
CSCD被引
45
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Haberl H. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: The case of Austria 1926~1995.
Ecological Economics,2001,38:25-45
|
CSCD被引
99
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Wackernagel M. Ecological footprint time series of Austria,the Philippines,and South Korea for 1961~1999:Comparing the conventional approach to an"actual land area" approach.
Land Use Policy,2004,21(3):261-269
|
CSCD被引
124
次
|
|
|
|
20.
刘淼. 生态足迹方法及研究进展.
生态学杂志,2006,25(3):334-339
|
CSCD被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
|