电力安全文化评价工具的编制
Design of Power Safety Culture Evaluation Scale
查看参考文献16篇
|
文摘
|
为探索电力安全文化结构,编制出具有较高信效度的评价工具。对深度访谈、参与观察采集的73个情景性行为片段进行编码分析,获取6个类中心,以此为基础编制量表;经试测和大规模抽样调查,对741名有效样本数据进行因素分析和信效度检验。结果表明:电力安全文化的评价指标由管理效力、人性观、规则执行、公平公正性和工作态度构成;因子分析所获因子与理论构想的类中心基本吻合,验证性因素分析所有指标均证明模型拟合较好;量表的再测信度为0.956(P<0.001),内部一致性系数为0.932(P<0.001)。所有统计结论表明,电力安全文化评价工具具备较高信效度,可以用于评估电力企业安全文化。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
For exploring the structures of safety culture in power utilities and compiling evaluation tools with high validity and reliability,73 behavioral fragments from embedded interview and participative observation were classified into six dimensions of behavioral norms.On the basis of it,a scale was designed;to verify the feasibility of this scale,factor analysis,validity and reliability test were conducted on 741 valid sample data.The results show that the evaluation index of power safety culture is made up of management effectiveness,humanity,rule execution,fair or impartial and work attitude;The factors from factor analysis correspond well with category centers from theoretical establishment and all quotas from confirmatory factor analysis prove a good fitness with the model;The retesting reliability is 0.956(P<0.001)and the Cronbach,s alpha coefficient is 0.932(P<0.001).All statistical conclusions imply that the power safety culture evaluation scale has high validity and reliability,which can be used to evaluate the power safety culture. |
|
来源
|
中国安全科学学报
,2011,21(8):151-157 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
安全文化
;
参与观察
;
因素分析
;
信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
重庆电力高等专科学校素质教学部, 重庆, 400053
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1003-3033 |
|
学科
|
安全科学 |
|
基金
|
重庆市电力公司重点科研项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4366679
|
参考文献 共
16
共1页
|
|
1.
Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications.
Journal of Applied Psychology,1980,65(1):96-102
|
CSCD被引
78
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Flin R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features.
Safety Science,2000,34(2):177-192
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Summary Report on the Post-accident Review Meeting on the Chernobyl Accident.
International Safety Advisory Group, Safety Series 75-INSAG-1,1986
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Lee T. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations.
Safety Science,2000,34(1/3):61-97
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Glendon A I. Perspectives on safety culture.
Safety Science,2000,34(1/3):43-72
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Schein E H. Organizational culture.
American Psychologist,1990,45(2):109-119
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
于广涛. 安全文化的内容、影响因素及作用机制.
心理科学进展,2004,12(1):87-95
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
于广涛.
某石油化工厂安全文化的多元方法研究,2004
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
于广涛. 安全文化在复杂社会技术系统安全控制中的作用.
中国安全科学学报,2003,13(10):4-7
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
于广涛. 行为科学关于安全控制的研究述评与未来研究展望.
中国安全科学学报,2009,19(3):86-92
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Glendon A I. Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behavior in road construction.
Safety Science,2001,39(2):157-188
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
O'Toole M. The relationship between employee's perceptions of safety and organizational culture.
Journal of Safety Research,2002,33(1):231-243
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Coyle I R. Safety climate.
Journal of Safety Research,1995,26(4):247-254
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Diaz R I. Safety climate and attitudes as evaluation measures of organizational safety.
Accident Analysis and Prevention,1997,29(5):643-650
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Cox S J. Assessing safety culture in offshore environments.
Safety Science,2000,34(3):111-129
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Guldenmund F W. The nature of safety:a review of theory and research.
Safety Science,2000,34(3):215-257
|
CSCD被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问