成对数据分析之行动者-对象互依性模型(APIM)
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM): A Model for Dyadic Data Analysis
查看参考文献41篇
文摘
|
成对关系是人际关系和人际互动的最基本的单元, 对成对关系的测量得到的成对数据具有人际关系的互依性特点, 这种互依性往往体现在对象效应上. 考虑到数据的互依性以及同时估计行动者效应和对象效应的行动者-对象互依性模型(APIM)是一种相对简单但很有吸引力的指导分析的模型. 成对数据中根据数据的变异源分为三种变量; 根据是否存在可区分开成对关系中的双方的变量而分为可区分和不可区分的数据; 成对数据的分析往往开始于互依性程度的检验; 在独立性不能得到满足的情况下, 考虑是否可区分, 则可以采用联合回归、多水平模型, 结构方程建模的方法, 对APIM中的各个效应进行估计. 其中, 尤为详细地介绍了使用LISREL软件进行结构方程建模分析的方法 |
其他语种文摘
|
The dyad is the fundamental unit of interpersonal interaction and interpersonal relations, and the phenomenon laying the dyad is an important topic in social science. The data collected from the dyad is characterized with the interdependence feature of interpersonal relationship, which manifests in the target effect and attracts researches' interests. The actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) is a simple yet compelling model of dyadic data, which takes the interdependence into consideration and estimates actor effect and target effect simultaneously. There are three kinds of variables according to the sources of variance, between-dyads variables, within-dyads variables and mix variables, and data can be distinct into exchangeable and non-exchangeable one depending on distinguishing variable existing or not. Dyadic data analysis always begins with an analysis of the degree of nonindependence. Then three methods can be used to estimate the effects, pooled regression, multilevel modeling, and structural equation modeling. Next, we illustrate the analysis with LISREL computer program for APIM path analysis without or with latent variables. Finally, the applications of APIM are brief reviewed and future development and implications for relationship research in China are presented |
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2010,18(8):1321-1328 【扩展库】
|
关键词
|
成对数据
;
APIM
;
非独立性/相依性
;
可区分
;
不可区分
|
地址
|
1.
中国人民大学劳动人事学院, 北京, 100872
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金面上项目
;
中国科学院人事教育局-中国科学院研究生科技创新与社会实践专项资助
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3971242
|
参考文献 共
41
共3页
|
1.
黄飞. 环形模型:整合人格研究的一种取向.
心理科学进展,2010,18:132-143
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
2.
张锦涛. 夫妻沟通模式与婚姻质量的关系.
心理发展与教育,2009,23:109-115
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Alferes V R. SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs.
Behavioral Research Methods,2009,41:47-54
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Brauer M. Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effect.
Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology,2000,36:410-423
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Bulter E A. Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific.
Emotion,2007,7:30-48
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Burkholder G J. An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models.
Structural Equation Modeling,2003,10:465-486
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Cillessen A H N. Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence.
International Journal of Behavioral Development,2005,29:165-172
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Campbell L. Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user friendly guide.
Personal Relationship,2002,9:327-342
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Campbell L. Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2005,88:510-531
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Cook W L. Integrating models of interdependence with treatment evaluations in marital therapy research.
Journal of Family Psychology,1998,12:529-542
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Cook W L. The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies.
International Journal of Behavioral Development,2005,29:101-109
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Crocker J. Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2008,95:555-575
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Cross S E. The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,78:791-808
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Cuperman R. Big five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables".
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2009,97:667-684
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Feng X. Emotional exchange in mother-child dyads: Stability, mutual influence, and associations with maternal depression and child problem behavior.
Journal of Family Psychology,2007,21:714-725
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Fiske S T.
Social cognition: From brain to culture,2007
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Gonzalez R. The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case.
Personal Relationships,1999,6:449-469
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Griffin D. Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case.
Psychological Bulletin,1995,118:430-439
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Kashy D A. The analysis of data from dyads and groups.
Handbook of research methods in social psychology,2000:451-477
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Kenny D A. Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,80:439-448
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|