生态补偿效益、标准——国际经验及对我国的启示
Benefits and standards of ecological compensation: International experiences and revelations for China
查看参考文献48篇
|
文摘
|
随着环境压力的不断增大,生态补偿作为解决环境问题的创新手段日益受到重视,补偿效益是生态补偿的核心.通过综合分析近年来国内外生态补偿研究的相关文献,发现优化选择补偿区域和合理的补偿标准是提高补偿效益的关键,机会成本是应用较广的确定生态补偿标准的方法,不同区域提供的生态服务以及损失的机会成本有差异.我国对区域差异关注较少,补偿标准未能反映农户的真实成本,存在补偿不足或对不需补偿就能提供生态服务的区域实施补偿等问题,补偿资金利用效益较低.国际上比较注重生态补偿的区域差异,在生态补偿效益、促进环境保护积极性等方面效果较好.针对我国目前生态补偿中存在的问题,借鉴国际经验,提出了确定生态补偿标准的理论框架. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
With environment pressures growing significantly,Payments for Environmental Services(PES)have attracted increasing interest as an innovative mechanism to resolve environmental problems.How to enhance the benefits of compensation is its key issue.By reviewing the main issues in PES design and implementation at home and abroad in recent years.we found that(1)both prioritizing sites to be compensated and setting subsidy standards reasonably are very important for enhancing the benefit of compensation;(2)logic standard of payments for environmental services is between opportunity cost and ecosystem services value. But the results of valuation on ecosystem services vary with methods.So opportunity-cost method is the way widely used to determine ecological compensation standard.Opportunity cost depends on natural and socio-economic conditions and changes among areas.
By synthesizing the information presented,we make a comparison in respect of choosing compensation regions,setting compensation standards,and environmental effectiveness at home and abroad.It was shown that less attention was paid to regional differences in China so that sometimes subsidies were insufficient to cover the real costs on environment Drotection of peasant household.Two problems emerged,that is,subsidies were lower than costs of providing eco-service,and regions with smaller deforestation risk were compensated.Both can lead to low efficiency of distribution compensation funds.
In foreign countries,a payment scheme that took variation in land conditions into account,which had better effects on ecological compensation benefits and on encouraging behavior of protecting environment.Finally,according to the existing problems in China and taking international examples,a framework to set a reasonable standard of ecological compensation was proposed. |
|
来源
|
地理研究
,2010,29(4):597-606 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
生态补偿
;
标准
;
效益
;
启示
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院地球化学研究所, 环境地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵州, 贵阳, 550002
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0585 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家重大基础研究计划973项目专项
;
贵州省科技厅项目
;
贵州科技厅社发项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3864366
|
参考文献 共
48
共3页
|
|
1.
MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).
Ecosystem and Human Well-being:Synthesis,2005:5
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Engel Stefanie. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice:An overview of the issues.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2008,65:663-674
|
CSCD被引
160
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
李文华. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望.
自然资源学报,2006,21(5):677-688
|
CSCD被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Jennifer Alix-Garcia. The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services.
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS,2008,13:375-394
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
秦艳红. 国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施.
自然资源学报,2007,22(4):557-567
|
CSCD被引
66
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
赖力. 生态补偿理论、方法研究进展.
生态学报,2008,28(6):2870-2877
|
CSCD被引
55
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Salzman J. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law.
STANFORD LAW REVIEW,2000,53:607-694
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Boyd J.
Resources for the Future,2006:6-2
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.
中国生态补偿机制与政策研究,2007:30-31
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
俞海. 中国生态补偿:概念、问题类型与政策路径选择.
中国软科学,2008,6:7-15
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
R.格伦.哈伯德.
经济学(微观),2007:109
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
中国21世纪议程管理中心可持续发展战略研究组.
生态补偿:国际经验与中国实践,2007:157
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Pfaff Alexander.
Location affects protection:Observable characteristics drive park impacts in Costa Rica[Working paper series SAN08-06],2008:1-28
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Wiinscher T. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental serviccs:a tool tor boosting conservation benefits.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2008,65(4):822-833
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Margules C R. Systematic conservation planning.
NATURE,2000,405:243-253
|
CSCD被引
154
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
谢高地. 生态系统服务研究：进展、局限和基本范式.
植物生态学报,2006,30(2):191-199
|
CSCD被引
146
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Costanza R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.
NATURE,1997,387:253-260
|
CSCD被引
3723
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
杨光梅. 生态系统服务价值评估研究进展——国外学者观点.
生态学报,2006,26(1):205-212
|
CSCD被引
89
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Castro E. Experience in the charge for hydro environmental services of the biodiversity to finance conservation and recuperation of hillside ecosystems.
The International Workshop on Market Creation for Biodiversity Products and Services,2001
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Macmillan D C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,1998,27:313-324
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问