积极情景线索对内隐攻击性的影响
Effects of Situational Positive Clues on Implicit Aggression
查看参考文献17篇
|
文摘
|
通过向被试呈现代表积极情景线索的材料(一段含有互助、和谐信息的公益短片),运用内隐联想测验(IAT)范式,从内隐社会认知的角度来研究积极情境线索对个体内隐攻击性的影响,并分析这种影响是否具有性别差异.结果表明:未观看积极情景线索材料的被试表现出显著的内隐攻击性,而观看积极情景线索材料的被试的内隐攻击性不显著;积极情景线索的主效应显著,且这一效应不存在性别差异.这说明,积极情景线索能有效抑制个体的内隐攻击性,并支持自我攻击信念IAT是测量个体内隐攻击性的有效工具. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The implicit association test (IAT) was used to investigate whether situational positive clues would reduce implicit aggression, and its difference in genders. The results showed there was a significant difference between the experimental group which completed the IAT after watching a prosocial and agreeable video, and the control group which just completed the IAT; the control group displayed higher aggressive bias than the experimental group. The main effect of manipulation was significant, and both the main effect of gender and the interaction between manipulation and gender were insignificant. The results suggested that the situational positive clues could restrain people's implicit aggression, regardless of a subject's gender. And it also proved IAT-aggression belief in self-schema was a valid measurement of implicit aggression. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2010,33(1):44-47 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
内隐联想测验
;
内隐攻击性
;
积极情景线索
;
自我攻击信念IAT
|
|
地址
|
1.
北京师范大学, 认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京, 100875
2.
西南大学心理学院, 重庆, 400715
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
国家教育部创新团队发展计划
;
科技部支持计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3849895
|
参考文献 共
17
共1页
|
|
1.
Anderson C A. Human Aggression.
Annual Review of Psychology,2002,53:27-51
|
CSCD被引
106
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Shium Andrew chen. "攻击性行为"社会认知的实验研究.
心理学报,1996(2):75-79
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Richetin J. Automatic processes and individual differences in aggressive behavior.
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR,2008,13(6):423-430
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Alexander T. Automatic Sources of Aggression.
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR,2002,7(1):53-68
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Anderson C A. The influence of media violence on youth.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST,2003,4:81-110
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Brian C. Implicit and explicit personality:a test of a channeling hypothesis foraggressive behavior.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(5):1299-1319
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
郭秀艳.
实验心理学,2004:233-236
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Greenwald A G. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The Implicit Association Test.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74:1464-1480
|
CSCD被引
126
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
徐景波. 正负性情绪的自主生理反应.
心理科学,1995,18(3):134-139
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
戴春林. 内隐攻击性的实验研究.
心理科学,2005,28(1):96-98
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Brendl M C. How do indirect measure of evaluation work? Evaluation the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review,2003,81(5):760-773
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Karpinski A. Attitudes and the Implicit "Association Test.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,81(5):774-788
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Blair I. The mellability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,2002,6:242-261
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Mitchell J P. Contextual variatious in implicit evaluation.
Journal of Experiment Psychology:General,2003,132(3):455-469
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Underwood M K. Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in Children:Why Can' t We All Just Get Along.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT,2002,10(2):248-266
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Harris M B. Gender and aggression Ⅰ:Perceptions of aggression.
SEX ROLES,1996,35:1-25
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Knight G P. Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression;A meta-analysis.
Aggressive Behavior,2002,28(5):366-393
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问