彩票购买者认知偏差量表初步编制及信效度检验
Development of Lottery Related Cognitive Distortions Scale for Chinese Lottery Buyers
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
目的:初步编制我国电脑型彩票购买者认知偏差量表.方法:根据国外相关理论和评估工具收集适用于我国购彩者的量表项目.经前期访谈、项目筛选和专家讨论等确定项目.按地域和彩票销售状况选择6省25个地市,随机抽取购彩者3584名施测,总样本随机分成两组分别进行探索性和验证性因素分析.结果:经项目分析和探索性因素分析删除项目后,最终形成19个项目的认知偏差量表,包括概率谬误、控制幻想、关系错觉和过于乐观的预期等四个因子.总量表及各因子的α系数在0.56-0.80之间;分半信度0.72;模型拟合指数均达到要求(χ~2/df=5.45;Mc=0.93;IFI=0.95;CCI=0.95;NFI=0.94;RSMEA=0.050).结论:本研究编制的电脑型彩票购彩者认知偏差量表具有较好的心理测量学品质.可在未来研究中应用. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: This study aims to develop a Chinese Lottery Related Cognitive Distortions Scale for Chinese computerized lottery buyers. Methods: 22 items were filtered and reworked by authors and applied to 3584 Welfare Lottery buyers from 25 cities of 6 provinces. Measures including demographic features questionnaire and cognitive distortions scale were taken. All cases were split to two groups: One sample of 1791 cases for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the other 1793 cases for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: After item analysis and exploratory analysis, 19 items remained and they were divided into four factors: optimistic expectation, gamblers' fallacy, illusory correlation and illusion of control. These factors could explain 42.86% of total variance, which were confirmed by CFA(χ~2/df=5.45;Mc=0.93; IFI=0.95;CFI=0.95; NFI=0.94;RSMEA=0.050). The internal consistency cronbach α of the questionnaire answered to the basic statistic criterion(r=0.56-0.80). Conclusion: The Lottery Related Cognitive Distortions Scale has good psychometric features and could be applied to Chinese lottery buyers. |
|
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2009,17(5):529-531,525 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
购彩者
;
认知偏差
;
心理测量学研究
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3757361
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
曾忠禄. 广州市彩票购买者特征分析.
澳门理工学报,2006(1)
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李菲.
去年福利彩票销量再上600亿,2009
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
李仁军. 济南市彩民心理健康状况分析.
精神医学杂志,2008,21(05):324-326
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
管晓琴. 认知偏差与大学生心理健康关系探讨.
科技信息(科学教研),2008,14:489
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
杨清艳. 非理性信念及其评估方法的研究现状.
中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(01):40-42
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.
Science,New Series,1974,185(4157):1124-1131
|
CSCD被引
148
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Raylu N. Pathological gambling:A comprehensive review.
Clinical Psychology Review,2002,22(7):1009-1061
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Steenbergh TA. Development and validation of the gamblers' beliefs questionnaire.
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS,2002,16(2):143-149
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Steven J. A new instrument to measure cognitive distortions in video lottery terminal users:The informational biases scale(IBS).
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES,2003,19(4):387
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Oei rP. Validation of the Chinese version of the gambling related cognitions scale(GRCS-C).
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES,2007,23(3):309-322
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
温忠麟. 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则.
心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194
|
CSCD被引
295
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
陈树林. 应激源、认知评价与抑郁障碍的关系研究.
中国临床心理学杂志,2000,8(02):104-106
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Walker MB. Irrational thinking among slot machine players.
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES,1992,8(3):245-261
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Langer EJ. The illusion of control.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1975,32(2):311-328
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Colin S. Depression and the illusion of control.
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY,1977,86(4):440-442
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Rogers P. The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling:A theoretical review.
JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES,1998,14(2):111-134
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Clotfeher CT. Notes:The 'gambler's fallacy' in lottery play.
Management Science,1993,39(12):1521
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
杜秀敏. 热手谬误和赌徒谬误心理机制研究述评.
心理科学进展,2008,16(04):524-531
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kahneman D.
Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases,1982
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问