农民工的应对方式、传统人格与贫困归因风格
Rural migrant workers' coping style,traditional personality and poverty attribution style
查看参考文献20篇
|
文摘
|
目的 探讨农民工的应对方式、传统人格与贫困归因的关联模型,以更好地理解中国大陆的贫困问题,挖掘出容忍制度不公的因素.方法 采用中国大陆版贫困归因问卷(CMPAQ)、简易应对方式问卷、韧性量表、中国人个性量表(CPAI-2)的内控-外控和节俭-奢侈分量表,对398名男性农民工进行施测,有效被试301名.结果 ①描述统计:农民工被试群体的积极应对方式高于常模[(1.92±0.45)分]、消极应对方式低于常模[(1.46±0.66)分],韧性得分低于常模[(60.98±14.26)分],勤奋(内控)和节俭得分高于常模[(5.53±2.17)分,(7.48±1.77)分];农民工在各贫困归因分量表上的得分从高到低依次为个人能力[(3.72±0.78)分]、社会制度[(3.45±1.03)分]、负担命运[(3.25±0.90)分]、地理环境[(3.07±0.97)分]和个人品质[(3.03±1.04)分].②回归分析:采用积极应对方式的农民工更倾向于做个人能力归因,而采用消极应对方式的农民工更倾向于做负担命运、社会制度和地理环境归因.高韧性的农民工更倾向于对贫困做个人能力归因,高内控的农民工更不倾向于做负担命运归因,节俭对所有贫困归因因子的回归均不显著.除了消极应对方式外,应对方式与其他人格变量对社会制度因子的回归系数均不显著.结论 农民工具有一些积极健康的心理资源,它们促进农民工对贫困现状作了高的个人能力归因,但是却一致存在容忍制度不公的倾向. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To explore the relative model for psychological resources and poverty attributions of migrant workers in adversities in the aim of understanding poverty problems in China Mainland and find out the factors for tolerance in systematic unjustness.Methods China Mainland Poverty Attribution Questionnaire (CMPAQ) ,Simple Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ),Resilience Scale (CD-RISC),Locus of Control subscale (I_E) and Thrift subscale (T_E) of CPAI-2 were used upon 398 rural migrant workers,in which 301 were valid.Results ①Deseription statistic: compared with national model,migrant workers score higher in positive coping style subsonic(1.92±0.45),and lower in negative coping style subscale (1.46±0.66),lower in CD-RISC (60.98±14.26) ,higher in I_E subscale (5.53±2.17) and lower in T_E subscale 7.48 + 1.77) ; Scores on the subscales of CMPAQ were separately overburden-fate (3.25±0.90),institution-unjustness (3.45±1.03),personal-competence(3.72±0.78),personal-quality (3.03±1.04),and geographical-environment (3.07±0.97).②Regress analysis:positive coping style can clearly positively predict personal-competence and personalquality attribution,while negative coping style can clearly positively predict all other factors.Resilience(CD-RISC)can clearly positively predict personal-competence attribution.The standard regression coefficient (β) of inner locus of control (I_E) to overburden-fate was negatively significant,while that of thrift (T_E) to all the poverty attribution factors was not significant.All variables other than negative coping style couldn' t clearly predict institution-unjustness attribution.Conclusion The study discovered some positive psychological resources in rural migrant workers.These resources help them attribute poverty to personal competence but stand in tolerance for institutional unjustness. |
|
来源
|
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
,2009,18(10):930-932 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
贫困归因
;
应对方式
;
人格
;
农民工
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所老年心理研究中心, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院心理研究所危机干预中心, 北京, 100101
3.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1674-6554 |
|
学科
|
预防医学、卫生学 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3739566
|
参考文献 共
20
共1页
|
|
1.
Smith GD. Income inequality and mortality:why are they related?.
British Medical Journal,1996,312:987-988
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Lever JP. Poverty,psychological resources and subjective well-being.
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH,2005,73:375-408
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Cummins RA. Personal income and subjective well-being:A review.
Joumal of Happiness Studies,2000,1:133-158
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
张慧. 2005年中国居民生活质量调查报告.
2006年中国社会形势分析与预测,2005:52-66
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
孔德生. 贫困大学生人格类型研究.
中国行为医学科学,2005,14:1044-1045
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
王雁. 贫困医学生心理健康、人格与主观幸福感的关系.
中国行为医学科学,2006,15:67-69
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Lewis O. The culture of poverty.
Scientific American,1966,215:19-25
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
吴胜涛. 贫困与反贫困:心理学的研究.
心理科学进展,2007,15:987-992
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Feagin J. Poverty:we still believe that Cod helps who help themselves.
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY,1972,6:101-129
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Oorschot WV. Blame or fate,individual or social?An international comparison of popular explanations of poverty.
EUROPEAN SOCIETIES,2000,2:1-28
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
陈西嫚. 农民工外显和内隐群体偏爱模式的对比研究.
中国行为医学科学,2008,17:913-915
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
康洁. 浙江省农民工心理健康透视及其对策.
宁波职业技术学院学报,2005,9:11-14
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
沈利敏. 农民工的压力感受与应对方式.
中国临床康复,2005,9:15-17
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Luthans F. More evidence on the value of Chinese workers' psychological capital:A potentially unlimited competitive resource?.
The International Joumal of Human Resource Management,2008,19:818-827
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
周明洁. 中国社会现代化进程和城市现代化水平与中国人群体人格变化模式.
心理科学进展,2007,15:203-210
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
解亚宁. 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究.
中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6:114-115
|
CSCD被引
190
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Yu XN. Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC)with Chinese People.
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY,2007,35:19-30
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Cheung FM. What is "Chinese" Personality? Subgroup Differences in the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI-2).
Acta Psychological Sinica,2004,36:491-499
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Harper DJ. Accounting for poverty:From attribution to discourse.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,1996,6:249-265
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Bonanno G. Loss trauma and human resilience.
American Psychologists,2004,59:20-28
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问