行为经济学中的损失规避
Loss Aversion in Behavior Economics
查看参考文献46篇
|
文摘
|
损失规避是指,人们总是强烈倾向于规避损失:一定数额的损失所引起的心理感受,其强烈程度约相当于两倍数额的获益感受.这种强烈的心理与行为倾向广泛存在于风险与非风险领域,在该两个领域中损失规避的研究范式也不同.损失规避常见于经济和消费等领域,可用于解释行为决策中有悖于规范化理论的诸多现象,如禀赋效应,现状偏差、股权溢价之迷和赢者的诅咒等.然而,损失规避的机制研究还存在许多尚未解决的问题,如损失规避的本质以及适用条件.今后的研究不仅要注重认知角度和情感依恋,还要结合认知过程来研究损失规避的性质和内在机制,以期帮助人们认识,预测及干预由损失规避造成的经济损失和非理性决策. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Loss aversion, which meaned that people were, on average, roughly twice as sensitive to losses as to gains, demonstrated that people have a strong psychological and behavioral tendency to avoid losses than the same amounts of gains in risky and riskless decision. We first introduced the definition of loss aversion briefly from theoretic and behavioral prospective, and the different research paradigms used in risky and riskless fields. Loss aversion was accepted as both a description and an explanation of the phenomenon, it was widely used in economic filed to explain abnormal phenomenon, such as endowment effect, status quo bias, equity premium puzzle, the winner's curse, and so on. Researchers did not only pay attention to the mediators of loss aversion, which can be divided into two categories: emotional attachment and cognitive perspective, but also focused on the mechanism of loss aversion. However, there were some problems with loss aversion which should be addressed in future research, such as the relationship with endowment effect and the difference from risk aversion. As loss aversion was an extensive-existed phenomenon, an associative understanding of the mechanism of loss aversion from emotional attachment, cognitive perspective and cognitive process would assist individual to recognize, predict and intervene the economic loss and irrational decisions caused by loss aversion. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2009,17(4):788-794 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
损失规避
;
价值函数
;
禀赋效应
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所社会与经济行为研究中心, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院“百人计划”项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3620830
|
参考文献 共
46
共3页
|
|
1.
沈厚才. 损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析.
管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
史金艳. 考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策.
东北大学学报（自然科学版）,2005,26:1196-1199
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
孙力强. 短视损失厌恶的行为金融理论简评.
中南财经政法大学学报,2008,1:81-85
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
徐绪松. 考虑损失规避的期望效用投资组合模型.
中国管理科学,2007,15(5):42-47
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
张耿. 损失规避与经济波动的福利成本研究.
经济学,2007,6:1239-1254
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
邹燕. 对期望理论的两个重要推进——损失厌恶系数λ及参考点研究.
运筹与管理,2007,16(5):87-89
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Ariely,D. When do losses loom larger than gains?.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH,2005,42:134-138
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Ariely,D. Buying,bidding,playing,or competing?Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY,2003,13:113-123
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Becker,G.M. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.
Behavioral Science,1964,9:226-232
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Brown,T.C. Loss aversion without the endowment effect,and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2005,57:367-379
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Carmen,Z. Focusing on the forgone:how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH,2000,27:360-370
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Carmon,Z. Option attachment:when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH,2003,30:15-29
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Chapman,G.B. Similarity and reluctance to trade.
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING,1998,11:47-58
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Chen,M.K. How basic are behavioral biases?Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior.
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY,2006,114:517-537
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Dhar,R. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH,2000,37:60-71
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Duxbury,D. Financial risk perception:Are individuals variance averse or loss averse?.
Economics letters,2004,84:21-28
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Harbaugh,W.T. Are adults better behaved than children?Age,experience,and the endowment effect.
Economics letters,2001,70:175-181
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Joaquin,D.C. Value at risk:Is a theoretically consistent axiomatic formulation possible?.
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2009,49(2):725-729
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Johnson,E.J. Exploring the nature of loss aversion.IZA Discussion Paper,No.2015.
http://ssm.com/abstract=892336,2006
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Johnson,E.J. Aspects of endowment:A query theory account of loss aversion.
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,2007,33:461-474
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问