洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展
A Review on Development of Vulnerability Assessment of Floods
查看参考文献39篇
|
文摘
|
洪水灾害是当今世界最严重的自然灾害之一,洪灾经济损失及风险评估是防洪减灾领域的一项基础性工作,而脆弱性的确定是评估模型的关键.文章在对自然灾害脆弱性评估方法总结的基础上,着重对洪水情景模拟中代表脆弱性的灾损率曲线开展探讨,对灾损曲线的起源、建立方法和综合运用的趋势进行研究.国外保险业与政府开展此类工作较早,相比于国外已经取得的丰硕研究成果而言,国内灾损率研究远远不能为决策提供有效的指导,这与我国面临的巨大洪灾风险不相称.政府、保险等部门与科研工作急需结合起来,填补城市洪灾脆弱性研究空白,多参数综合调研、深入各种承灾体内部系统而细致地开展灾损率调查,对于减少未来洪灾影响,具有非常重要的实际意义. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Flood is one of the most serious natural disasters in the world. The evaluation on economic loss or risk from flood disasters is the basic task in the domain of flood prevention and disaster reduction, and the research on vulnerability is key to the evaluation. This paper briefly describes the methods of vulnerability assessment, emphasizing on stage-damage curves. The origin, the methods to structure them and the compositive application are discussed then. Compared to the rich research results overseas on the damage curves, the research on vulnerability is far from enough in China yet and the application at a lower level can neither satisfy the damands for decision-support, nor correspond to the high flood risks in China. At present, scientific research, insurance and government should cooperate in the vulnerability investigation in order to reduce the influence of floods. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2009,28(1):41-46 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
洪水
;
脆弱性
;
灾损曲线
;
风险
;
经济损失
|
|
地址
|
华东师范大学, 地理信息科学教育部重点实验室, 上海, 200062
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金
;
上海市科技攻关重大项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3559725
|
参考文献 共
39
共2页
|
|
1.
黄大鹏. 洪灾风险评价与区划研究进展.
地理科学进展,2007,26(4):11-22
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Beming C. Loss functions for structural flood mitigation measures.
Water S A,2001,27(1):35-38
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Kaplan S. On the quantitative definition of risk.
Risk Analysis,1981,1(1):11-27
|
CSCD被引
61
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Hall J W. A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment.
Water & Maritime Engineering,2003,156(WM3):235-247
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Grunthal G. Comparative risk assessment for the city of Cologne,Germany:Storms,foods,earthquakes.
NATURAL HAZARDS,2006,38(1/2):21-44
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Pelling M.
United Nations Development Programme.A Global Report Reducing Disaster Risk:A Challenge for Development,2004:1-146
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Pelling M.
Visions of risk:A review of international indicators of disaster risk and its management,2004:1-56
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Dilley M.
Natural disaster hotspots:A global risk analysis,2005:1-132
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Cardona O D. Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management Summary Report for WCDR.
Program for Latin America and the Caribbean IADB～UNC/IDEA,2005:1-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Davidson R.
An Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index,1997
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
King D. Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards.
Australian Journal of Emergency Management,2000,15(3):52-57
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Lambert K.
A Hurricane Disaster Risk Index,2000
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Penning-Rowsell E C.
The benefits of flood alleviation:A manual of assessment techniques,1977
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Smith D I. Flood damage estimation?A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions.
Water S A,1994,20(3):231-238
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
KGS Group.
Red River Basin Stage-damage Curves Update and Preparation of Flood Damage Maps,2000
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
USACE.
Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basin,California.Post-Flood Assessment for 1983,1986,1995,and 1997,1999
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
USACE.
Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM)01-03,Generic Depth-Damage Relationships,2000
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
USACE.
Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM)04-01,Generic Depth-Damage Relationships,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
苏明道.
国科会专题研究计划成果报告--基隆河流域淹水损害评估模式与相关资料库建立之研究(二),2002
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Gissing A. Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation.
AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER,2004,35(2):209-222
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问