中国企业开发式学习与利用式学习平衡的实证研究
Balance between exploitation learning and exploration learning of Chinese enterprises
查看参考文献23篇
文摘
|
在构建创新型国家的当今中国,企业开发式学习和利用式学习的平衡是管理理论和实践中的焦点问题.在全国10个城市110家企业进行问卷调查,得到677份有效问卷.结构方程模型分析结果表明,利用式学习和开发式学习是企业学习的两个方面,而不是一个连续体的两个端点.多层回归分析结果表明,利用式学习和开发式学习对财务绩效有显著的积极影响;二者对财务绩效有显著的交互作用:在高利用式学习条件下,开发式学习对财务绩效有显著的积极影响,但在低利用式学习条件下,开发式学习对财务绩效没有显著影响;利用式学习和开发式学习的差对财务绩效没有显著影响.这启发我国企业要在保持高水平的利用式学习的条件下,再提高开发式学习的水平. |
其他语种文摘
|
Today, there were few systematic empirical researches directly linking the balance of the two learning with organiza- tional performance. Six hundred and seventy seven employees from 10 cities in China answered the questionnaire. The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed that exploration learning and exploitation learning were two sides of enterprise lean- ing rather than two end point of a continuum. The results of Hierarchical Regression Analysis ( HRA) showed that exploration learning and exploitation learning were significantly positively related to finance performance. And the results also showed that there were positive and significant interaction effects between exploration learning and exploitation learning for finance perform- ance. And the difference between exploitation learning and exploration learning was non - significantly related to the finance per- formance. The main implication was that Chinese enterprises should improve the level of exploitation learning before strengthening exploration learning. |
来源
|
科研管理
,2008,29(6):137-144 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
利用式学习
;
开发式学习
;
组织学习
;
财务绩效
;
平衡
|
地址
|
1.
北京师范大学, 北京
2.
清华大学, 北京
3.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京
4.
暨南大学, 广东, 广州
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-2995 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
北京师范大学社会科学基金项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3498423
|
参考文献 共
23
共2页
|
1.
March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.
Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87
|
CSCD被引
300
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Crossan M. An organizational learning framework:from intuition to institution.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW,1999,24(3):522-537
|
CSCD被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Gupta A K. The interplay between exploration and exploitation.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2006,49(4):693-706
|
CSCD被引
59
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Vassolo R S. Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities:a real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology.
Strategic Management Journal,2004,25:1045-1061
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Vermeulen F. Learning through acquisitions.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2001,44:457-478
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Baum J A C. Making the next move:How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains'acquisitions.
Administrative Science Journal,2000,45:766-801
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Zi-Lin H. Exploration VS.exploitation:an empifical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis.
Organization Science,2004,15:481-494
|
CSCD被引
108
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Argyris C.
Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective,1978
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Senge P.
The Fifth Discipline:The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,1990
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
10.
March J G. Rational!ty,foolishness,and adaptive intelligence.
Strategic Management Journal,2006,27:201-214
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Beckman C M. Friends or strangers?Firm-specific uncertainty,market uncertainty,and network partner selection.
Organization Science,2004,15:259-275
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Beckman CM. Theinfluence of~undingteam company affiliafions on firm behavior.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2006,49:741-758
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Holmqvist M. A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizafional leaning.
ORGANIZATION STUDIES,2003,24(1):95-123
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Levinthal D A. The myopia of learning.
Strategic of management Journal,1993,14:95-112
|
CSCD被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Burgelman R A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in.
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY,2002,47:325-357
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Tushman M L. Ambidextrous organizations:Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change.
Colifornia Management Review,1996,38:8-30
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Eisenhardt K M. Dynamic capabilities:what are they?.
Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:1105-1121
|
CSCD被引
140
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Katila R. Something old,something new:A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2002,45:1183-1194
|
CSCD被引
97
次
|
|
|
|
19.
于海波. 企业组织的学习结构.
心理学报,2006,38(4):590-597
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Calantone R J. Learning ofientation,finn innovation capability,and finn performance.
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT,2002,31:515-524
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|