高分辨率遥感图像融合的光谱保真问题
Spectral Fidelity in High-resolution Remote Sensing Image Fusion
查看参考文献11篇
文摘
|
分析高分辨率遥感图像融合光谱失真的原因,利用基于滤波原理的Wavelet、SFIM融合算法和基于统计原理的Gram-schmidt、PCI pansharp模块提供的融合算法对高分辨率遥感图像的代表QuickBird图像进行融合试验。结果表明:这四种融合算法虽都具有很好的光谱保真性,但从光谱保真度和高频信息融入度这两个方面的定量分析来看,基于统计原理的融合方法总体上优于基于滤波原理的融合方法,更适合于QuickBird高分辨率遥感图像的融合。 |
其他语种文摘
|
An effective image fusion technique can not only improve spatial details but also preserve the spectral information. Many research papers have reported the limitations of exiting fusion techniques. The most significant problem is spectral distortion. For IHS fusion, a common strategy is to match the Pan to the I band before the replacement, stretch the H and S bands before reversing HIS transform, or stretch individual I, H or S band with respect to individual data sets. In PCA fusion, the solutions are stretching the principal components to give a spherical distribution, or discarding the first principal component. By selecting these proper fusion techniques, successful results can be achieved for the fusion of SPOT Pan with MS images. However, these techniques are not efficient for the new high-resolution satellite images, such as IKONOS and QuiekBird images . This study analyses the reasons for spectral distortion in the new high-resolution image fusion. The research reveals two major reasons. One major reason for the distortion is the wavelength extension of the new satellite Pan image. The radiometrie difference between different sensors is also an important reason if the fusion images are from different sensor systems. Four image fusion algorithms have been employed to resolve the spectral distortion problem in the study of Quick-Bird image fusion. These are the filter-based algorithms such as Wavelet and SFIM transforms, and statistics-based algorithms such as Gram-sehmidit and PCI pansharp modules. The experimental results show that although all these four algorithms have good spectral fidelity property, the statistics-based algorithms are generally more efficient than filter-based algorithms through the quantitative statistical analysis of spectral fidelity and the ability of gaining high frequency information. But the research result is only for QB image. |
来源
|
地球信息科学
,2008,10(4):520-526 【扩展库】
|
关键词
|
高分辨率遥感图像
;
光谱保真度
;
QuickBird图像
|
地址
|
福州大学环境与资源学院, 福建, 福州, 350002
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1560-8999 |
学科
|
电子技术、通信技术;自动化技术、计算机技术 |
基金
|
福建省自然科学基金
;
福建师范大学优秀青年骨干教师培养基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3350547
|
参考文献 共
11
共1页
|
1.
Clayton D G. Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization.
Applied Statistics,1971,20(3):335-338
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Krista Amolins. Wavelet based image fusion techniques-An introduction review and comparison.
Photogrametry&Remote sensing,2007,62:249-263
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
LIU J G. Smoothing filter-based intensity modulation:a spectral preserve image fusion technique for improving spatial details.
Internationl Journal of Remote Sensing,2000,21(18):3461-3472
|
CSCD被引
101
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Zhang Y. Understanding image fusion.
Photogrametric Engineering&Remote Sensing,2004,70(6):657-661
|
CSCD被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
5.
戴昌达.
遥感图像应用处理与分析,2004
|
CSCD被引
59
次
|
|
|
|
6.
刘勇卫(译).
遥感精解,1993
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
7.
马艳华. 高空间分辨率和高光谱分辨率遥感图像的融合.
红外,2003(10):11-16
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
8.
徐涵秋. Landsat 7 ETM +影像的融合和自动分类研究.
遥感学报,2005,9(2):186-194
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
9.
徐涵秋. 基于影像的Landsat TM/ETM~+数据正规化技术.
武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(1):62-66
|
CSCD被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
10.
李存军. 两种高保真遥感影像融合方法比较.
中国图象图形学报,2004,11(9):1375-1387
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
11.
.
www.pcigeomatics.com
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|