句子语境中汉语词汇歧义消解的眼动研究
Effects of Sentence Context on the the Resolution of Chinese Lexical Ambiguity
查看参考文献15篇
|
文摘
|
采用眼动方法.通过两个实验考察了汉语同音同形歧义词的歧义消解过程.结果显示:(1)在中性句子语境中,均衡歧义词的首视时间显著高于偏向歧义词.歧义词的意义通达仅受歧义词意义的相对频率影响,不受语境的影响;(2)在偏向句子语境中,当语境支持歧义词的次要意义时,被试对偏向歧义词的解歧信息的注视时间显著高于其他两类目标词,体现了语境对歧义词意义的整合作用.实验结果支持词汇歧义消解的模块化模型的观点. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Using the eye tracking method, we conducted two experiments to examine the processes of the resolution of ambiguous Chinese homographs. The results show that (1) the first fixation duration of the balanced ambiguous words were significantly higher than that of the biased ambiguous words. The meaning access of ambiguous words was influenced only by the relative frequency of the ambiguous word's meanings but not by the context; (2) the fixations duration of the unambiguous information for biased ambiguous words, was significantly longer than that of the other two types of targets, which display the role of context in the integration of meanings. Those results support the modular model of lexical ambiguity resolution. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2008,31(4):875-879 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
词汇歧义消解
;
句子语境
;
眼动
;
注视时间
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
辽宁师范大学心理系, 辽宁, 大连, 116029
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国博士后科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金
;
国家教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金
;
辽宁省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3340414
|
参考文献 共
15
共1页
|
|
1.
武宁宁. 句子语境中汉语词类歧义词的意义激活.
心理学报,2002,34(5):454-461
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Kambe G. Global context effects on proofing lexically ambiguous words. evidence from eye fixations.
Memory and Cognition,2001,29(2):363-372
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Sereno SC. The effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words:evidence from eye fixations.
Psychological Science,1992,5(3):296-300
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Boland J E. Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation:lexical bias and discourse eorigruency effects on eye movements.
Journal of Memory and Iangllage,2001,45:391-411
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Rayner K. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading:Etfeets of word frequency, verb, complexity and lexical ambiguity.
Memory and Cognition,1986,14:191-201
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Dully SA. Lexieal ambiguity and fixation times in reading.
Journal of Mmaory and Lsnguage,1988,27:429-446
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
胡志伟. 中文多字多义词自由联想常模.
中华心理学刊,1996,2:67-169
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Rayner K. Effects of prior encounter and discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words.
Journal of Memory and Language,1994,33:527-544
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Frazier L. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities. eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentence.
Journal of Memory and Language,1987,26:505-526
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Klepomniotou E. The processing of lexical ambiguity:homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.
Brain and Language,2002,81:205-223
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Picketing M J. Processing ambiguous verbs:evidence from eye movements.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition,2001,2:556-573
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Germbacher M A. The mechanism of suppression:a component of general comprehension skill.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition,1991,17:245-262
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Germbacher M A. Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanism.
Psychological Science,1993,4:294-298
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
张亚旭. 汉语同音异形词意义识别中的抑制过程.
心理学报,2003,3:291-299
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
周治金. 汉语歧义词加工中抑制机制的作用过程.
心理学报,2004,6:637-643
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问