|
文摘
|
市场是配置资源的基础手段和有效方式，市场发育程度的不同会导致不同的资源配置和利用效率。文章在构建市场发育与土地集约利用的理论分析框架基础上，采用因子分析法和多因素分析模型分别对江苏省开发区的土地市场化率和不同市场发育阶段土地利用的集约度进行了测算。研究结果表明，江苏省33．4％的开发区的土地市场发育处于转型后期至相对成熟期发展阶段；57．1％处于转型中期发展阶段，整体来说，市场发育较为成熟。而不同土地市场发育阶段土地利用的集约度不同，处于转型后期至相对成熟期发展阶段的开发区土地利用集约水平要显著高于处于转型中期发展阶段的开发区。因此，文章认为提高我国土地利用集约度的主要思路应是推进土地市场创新，使市场成为土地资源配置的主要机制，并作为转变土地管理机制的基本点。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
It's a formidable task for a long time in China that how to utilize the land resources intensively and protect farmlands.The improvement of land use intensity is an important embodiment for the optimum land allocation.Market is the basic and efficient way to allocate resource.However,different market degrees can lead to different efficiencies of resource allocation and utilization.On the basis of building a framework of different land use efficiencies under the effect of market and government in different land market development stages,the article makes an empirical study on the development zones in Jiangsu province.By factor analysis and multifactors analysis model,and on the basis of the data of economy and land use in 2004,this study measured the development of land market and the intensity of land use in different land market stage.The result of the study suggests that on the whole,the stage of land market development is rather high,while the stage is different in different development zones.For example,the degree of land market in Wujiang and Nanjing development zones is 78% and 69%,respectively.The degree of land market in Yixing,Zhangjiagang and other 13 development zones is between 50% and 65%;at the same time,the degree of land market is between 30% and 50% in 23 development zones;and as for the remaining 4 development zones,the degree is only between 15% and 30%.So,the stage of land market in 33.4% of the development zones is in the end of transition to relatively mature stage;while the stage of land market in 57.1% of the development zones is in the middle transition stage.At the same time,the intensity of land use is different in different land market stages.The score of the intensity index of land use in the end of transition to relatively mature stage is 65.49,which is higher than that of the middle of transition stage.Because the score of intensity index of the latter is only 48.85,the former is higher than the latter.So,the paper thinks the innovation method to improve land use intensity is to change the mechanism of land management,and let market mechanism become the main way to allocate land resource. |
|
来源
|
自然资源学报
,2007,22(3):445-454 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
土地资源管理
;
市场化
;
土地市场
;
土地集约利用
|
|
地址
|
南京农业大学公共管理学院, 南京, 210095
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-3037 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金国家杰出青年科学基金
;
江苏省国土资源厅项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3053239
|
|
|
1.
卢中原. 市场化改革对我国经济运行的影响.
经济研究,1993(6):49-55
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
江晓薇. 中国市场经济度的探索.
管理世界,1995(6):32-37
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
国家计委市场与价格研究所课题组. 我国经济市场化程度的判断.
宏观经济管理,1996(2):20-23
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
顾海兵. 中国经济市场化程度的最新估计与预测.
管理世界,1997(2):52-55
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
陈宗胜.
中国经济体制市场化进程研究,1999
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
李明月.
我国城市土地资源配置的市场化研究,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
顾海兵. 中国经济的市场化与非农化.
经济理论与经济管理,2001(1):17-22
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
顾海兵. 中国经济市场化程度:九五估计与十五预测.
经济学动态,1999(4):13-19
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
曲福田. 我国土地管理政策：理论命题与机制转变.
管理世界,2005(4):40-47
|
CSCD被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
陈江龙. 农地非农化效率的空间差异及其对土地利用政策调整豹启示.
管理世界,2004(8):37-43
|
CSCD被引
60
次
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问