国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施
A Review of Ecological Compensation and Its Improvement Measures
查看参考文献35篇
文摘
|
通过回顾发达国家(如美国、欧洲国家)和发展中国家(如中国、拉丁美洲国家)在实施生态补偿过程中采取的各种措施,发现其中存在的一些问题。在此基础上,总结了生态补偿的运行机制,提出完善生态补偿机制的措施,即:界定受偿方和支付方,明确各自的权利与义务;以机会成本为理论依据,将受偿地区生态保护与经济社会发展综合考虑,设定具有差异性的补偿标准,并将补偿分为基本补偿、产业结构调整补偿以及生态效益外溢补偿3个阶段;综合受益程度、支付能力和支付意愿确定支付方的支付标准;建立融资渠道,有效配置资金;建立生态补偿组织管理体系。生态补偿机制应以“造血式”补偿为目标,在研究中需加强生态学与经济学理论与方法的交叉。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Ecological conservation or protection is a kind of socioeconomic activity with positive externality.To internalize the externality,the concept of Ecological Compensation (EC) is put forward.It adopts economic and market-based instruments to encourage people participate in ecological conservation.Participant Gets Principle (PGP) and Beneficiary Pays Principle (BPP) are the two basic principles of it.EC has been widely applied to afforestation,watershed management,agro-environmental protection,biodiversity conservation,carbon sequestration,and so on.While its theories and practices are still in infancy,the compensation system is imperfect with respect to who should be compensated,who should pay,how much to be compensated,and how to finance and allocate compensation payments.By reviewing EC approaches and some efforts that have been made in developed countries (e.g. America and some European countries) and developing countries (e.g. China and Latin American countries),we find out there was very little use of the BPP,ecology and economics have not been well integrated into EC studies,most programs just focus on payments,ignoring the influence of socioeconomic factors on ecological conservation,and so on.After the review and comments,we summarize a functioning mechanism of ecological compensation,which can guide us to improve ecological compensation system.The improvement methods concern:(a)identifying providers and beneficiaries of ecosystem services; (b)on the basis of opportunity cost approach,integrating ecological conservation with regional socioeconomic development,settling proper compensation standards to services providers;(c)calculating payment levels from the side of beneficiaries by integrating the quantity of services they receive,their willingness to pay and their bearing capacity;(d)seeking financing sources and allocating payments cost-effectively;and(e)building up the framework of EC.We consider an effective EC system should take “hematogenesis” rather than “blood transfusion” as its object,and EC research should integrate ecological theories and methods with those of economics. |
来源
|
自然资源学报
,2007,22(4):557-567 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
生态补偿
;
生态服务
;
支付方和受偿方
;
补偿标准
|
地址
|
北京师范大学资源学院资源管理研究所, 北京, 100875
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-3037 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家社会科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2978938
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
1.
Mayrand K. Payments for environmental services:A survey and assessment of current schemes.
Montreal:Unisféra International Center(for the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America),2004
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Caplan A J. An efficient mechanism to control correlated externalities:redistributive transfers and the coexistence of regional and global pollution permit markets.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005,49:68-82
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
3.
毛显强. 生态补偿的理论探讨.
中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(4):38-41
|
CSCD被引
121
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Cowell R.
Trans Inst Br Geogr,1997,22(3):292-306
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Merlo M. Public goods and externalities linked to Mediterranean forests:Economic nature and policy.
Land Use Policy,2000,17:197-208
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Murray B C. Estimating price compensation requirements for eco-certified forestry.
Ecological Economics,2001,36:149-163
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Wells M. Biodiversity conservation affluence and poverty:Mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them.
AMBIO,1992,21:237-243
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Pagiola S. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty?An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America.
World Development,2004,33(2):237-253
|
CSCD被引
88
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Hamdar B. An efficiency approach to managing Mississippi's marginal land based on the conservation reserve program(CRP).
Resources,1999,26:15-24
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Bacon P J. Belief network models of land manager decisions and land use change.
Journal of Environmental Management,2002,65(1):1-23
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Arnalds O. Soil erosion and land use policy in Iceland in relation to sheep grazing and government subsidies.
Environmental Science&Policy,2003,6:105-113
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Gutman P. From good-will to payments for environmental services:A survey of financing alternatives for sustainable natural resource management in developing countries.
WWF,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Dudley R G. A generic look at payments for environmental services:Plan or scam?.
The 23rd International System Dynamics Conference,2005
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Hanley N. Principles for the provision of public goods from agriculture:Modeling moorland conservation in Scotland.
Land Economics,1995,74(1):102-113
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Landell-Mills N. Silver bullet or fool's gold?A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor.
IIED,2002
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
. Danièle Perrot-Maitre Patsy Davis.
Case studies of markets and innovative financial mechanisms for water services from forests,2001
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Wu J. Targeting conservation efforts in the presence of threshold effects and ecosystem linkages.
Ecological Economics,42:313-331
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
18.
McCarthy S. Economic determinants of private afforestation in the Republic of Ireland.
Land Use Policy,2003,20:51-59
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Castro R. The Costa Rican Experience with Market Instruments to Mitigate Climate Change and Conserve Biodiversity.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2000,61:75-92
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Clough P.
Encouraging private biodiversity:Incentives for biodiversity conservation on private land,2000
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|