有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为——当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论
A Comparison between Two Models of Bounded Rationality：Equate-to-Differentiate and Priority Heuristic Approaches
查看参考文献37篇
|
文摘
|
人们在做决策时常常要受到时间或知识的限制，有时还要受到其双重限制。关于人们是如何进行风险决策，早期有期望效用理论对其加以解释，但Allais悖论对其标准化地位提出了挑战。Simon的“有限理性”观点提出后，一些研究者开始致力于开发决策的“有限理性”模型。文章讨论并比较了无限理性的期望效用理论被Allais悖论杠杆撬动之后，有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型所能做的和所不能做的。两种模型的决策标准、计算策略以及未来研究的展望也一并作了讨论。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
People are often restricted in their limited time or knowledge when making decisions. This raises a question of how people make risky decisions, In the early time, the Expected Utility theory gave a normative answer to the question, The status of the theory, however, was challenged by the Allais paradox. Simon rejected the idea of optimal choice, proposing the idea of ＂bounded rationality,＂ Since then, several researchers became interested in developing models of bounded rationality, In this paper, we compare and contrast Equate-to-Differentiate and Priority Heuristic approaches. We review the methods and the criteria, emphasizing the differences between them in terms of both the models they use and the computational strategies they employ. An implication for further research is discussed and suggested. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2007,15(4):682-688 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
有限理性
;
占优启发式
;
“齐当别”模型。
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所社会与经济行为研究中心, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院“百人计划”项目
;
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2975707
|
参考文献 共
37
共2页
|
|
1.
李纾. 艾勒悖论（Allais Paradox）另释.
心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Allais M. Le comportement de I'homme rationanel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axioms de I'ecole Americaine.
Econometrica,1953,21:503-546
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Savage L.
The Foundations of Statistics,1954
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Kahneman D. Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk.
Econometrica,1979,47:263-291
|
CSCD被引
1196
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Edwards W. Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions.
Psychological Review,1962,69:109-135
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1982,3:323-343
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Einhorn H J. Decision making under ambiguity.
Journal of Business,1986,59:225-250
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Luce R D. Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1991,4:29-59
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
刘霞. 确定性风险选择的抱负水平--相对效用整合理论.
心理科学,1998,21:412-419
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Allais M. An outline of my main contribute to economic science(Nobel Lecture).
Theory and Decision,1991,30:1-26
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Li S. Is there a decision weight (?.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1995,27:453-463
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Simon H A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Psychological Review,1956,63(2):129-138
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Lopes L L. Between hope and fear:The psychology of risk.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1987,20:255-295
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Montgomery H. Towards a process model of decision making.
Advances in Psychology.Analysing and Aiding Decision Process,1981:343-369
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Li S. A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters.
Applied Intelligence,2004,20(2):147-163
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Li S.
Equate-to-differentiate theory:A coherent bi-choice model across certainty uncertainty and risk[doctoral dissertation],1994:Unpublished
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Brandstatter E. The priority heuristic:Making choices without trade-offs.
Psychological Review,2006,113(2):409-432
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Daniel G. Models of ecological rationality:the recognition heuristic.
Psychological Review,2002,109(1):75-90
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Peter M. Putting Naturalistic Decision Making into the Adaptive Toolbox.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2001,14(5):381-382
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
李纾. 再探框架对风险决策行为的影响.
心理学报,2000,32(2):229-234
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问