帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

绩效、能力、职位对组织分配公平观的影响
The Effects of Performance, Competence and Position on Organizational Distributive Justice

查看参考文献19篇

陈曦 1   马剑虹 2   时勘 1  
文摘 旨在探索基于组织分配公平的认知评价和决策行为的影响因素,为此提出了不公平阈限的概念,即在追求公平和谋求自我利益的动机权衡中,个体为了追求公平而愿意放弃的最高限度的个人利益.采用最后通牒博弈和独裁者博弈的二阶段实验范式,样本量为60.结果发现,工作绩效、工作能力均对个体的不公平阈限有显著的影响;对于公平判断和基于公平的回应行为,工作绩效起着首要作用,工作能力的影响次之,再次是对方的提议数额的影响.第一阶段对方提议的分配方案对被试越有利,则第二阶段被试的回应行为越有利于对方.排除能力差别的作用之后,职位差别并未引起不公平阈限的显著差异.根据研究结果,总结出分配公平的三项原则:绩效原则、能力原则和互惠原则.
其他语种文摘 Distributive justice is important in predicting organizational outcomes such as satisfaction and commitment.So norms of distributive justice are crucial for organizational research and practice.Distributive justice norms may vary across cultures and eras.Research on this topic in Chinese context is scarce.The economic and social reconstruction in China since the 1980s could be reflected in the change of ideology of distributive justice.This research explored the effects of three factors,performance,competence and position,on distributive justice and their variation from the 1980s to the present.Neuroscientists discovered that the pursuit of self-interest and achievement of justice could constitute conflicting motives.We proposed the concept of threshold of injustice,defined as the maximum degree of self-interest one was willing to abnegate for the sake of justice.With this concept,we could study distributive justice in a multi-motive decision-making framework.The first experiment explored the effects of work performance and competence on distributive justice,through a 2(high vs.low competence,between-subject)×3(performance:finishing 30%,50%,70% of the work,within-subject) design.In the second experiment we examined the effect of position after controlling the effect of competence,using a 2(high vs.low competence,between-subject)×2(pure competence difference vs.competence plus position difference,within-subject) design.We designed a two-phase game composed of an Ultimatum Game and a Dictator Game.In the first phase,participants acted as Responders in the Ultimatum Game,deciding on accepting or rejecting the offer proposed by a virtual Proposer and evaluating fairness of him or her.In the second phase,participants' role changed to Dictator,proposing offer to the same virtual partner.Sixty Chinese undergraduate students participated in this research.Repeated ANOVA,stepwise regression and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data.ANOVA Results indicated that both work performance and competence had significant effects on threshold of injustice,justice evaluation and feedback offer.After the effect of competence being controlled,position did not have any significant effects.Regression results showed that performance was the first predictor of distributive justice,and competence came the second.Compared with the findings in the 1980s,performance remained the primary factor in distributive justice;competence showed significant rise in distribution norms while position's significance declined.The distribution outcomes would affect feedback behaviors.Cluster analysis implied that there were individual differences in distributive justice norms.To be specific,a large proportion of people,70% in this research,made fairness-referenced decision-making based on clues of performance and competence.However,a small proportion of people,30% here,relied mainly on how others treated them to decide their reactions.This research indicated that 1) performance was the primary predictor of threshold of injustice,followed by competence;2) except performance and competence,the offer proposed by the partner also demonstrated positive influence on distributive justice perception and reactive decision-making;3) without high competence as evidence,high position itself was not considered to be worthy of high reward;4) individual difference existed in distributive justice referenced decision-making norms:a large proportion of people showed event-based style while a small proportion showed relationship-based style;5) after the economic and social reform in China,the importance of performance and competence has increased,compared with position,in organizational distribution norms.Based on these results,we summarized the principles of distributive justice as performance law,competence law,and reciprocity law.
来源 心理学报 ,2007,39(5):901-908 【核心库】
关键词 分配公平 ; 不公平阈限 ; 最后通牒博弈 ; 独裁者博弈
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 浙江大学心理与行为科学学院, 杭州, 310028

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:2923404

参考文献 共 19 共1页

1.  约翰·罗尔斯. 正义论,1988:332-338 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Cropanzano R. Process in organizational justice:tunneling through the maze. International review of industrial and organizational psychology,1997:317-372 CSCD被引 9 次    
3.  Greenberg J. Studying organizational justice cross-culturally:fundamental challenges. The International Journal of Conflict Management,2001,12(4):365-375 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Cohen C Y. The role of justice in organizations:a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2001,86(2):278-321 CSCD被引 1 次    
5.  Colquitt J A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice:a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86:386-400 CSCD被引 68 次    
6.  Cropanzano R. Original contribution:moral virtues fairness heuristics social entities and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2001,58:164-209 CSCD被引 15 次    
7.  刘亚. 组织公平感对组织效果变量的影响. 管理世界,2003,3:126-132 CSCD被引 18 次    
8.  李超平. 分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响. 心理学报,2003,35(5):677-684 CSCD被引 213 次    
9.  周浩. 分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异. 心理学报,2005,37(5):687-693 CSCD被引 9 次    
10.  俞文钊. 公平差别阈与分配公平. 行为科学,1991,1:8-13 CSCD被引 3 次    
11.  余凯成. 中国大陆企业职工分配公平感研究. 台北:本土心理学研究,1995,4:42-91 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  周其仁. 市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约. 经济研究,1996,6:71-79 CSCD被引 8 次    
13.  Gilliland S W. A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations:Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1998,76(2):113-131 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Robinson S L. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors:a multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38:555-572 CSCD被引 44 次    
15.  龙立荣. 组织不公正及其效果研究述评. 心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593 CSCD被引 18 次    
16.  Eskander A. Fairness and self-interest:an assessment. Journal of Socio-Economics,1998,27(2):245-261 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  Sanfey A G. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science,2003,300(13):1755-1758 CSCD被引 70 次    
18.  Edi Karni E. Intensity of the sense of fairness:measurement and behavioral characterization. Journal of Economic Theory,2002,105:318-337 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  王海明. 公正、平等、人道--社会治理的道德原则体系,2000:3 CSCD被引 1 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 钟罗金 资源的交换价值和工资性质对其分配公平感的影响 心理学报,2014,46(9):1392-1399
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号