帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

品牌态度强度与品牌态度可达性的关系性质
The Relationship between Attitude Strength and Attitude Accessibility in Brand Evaluation

查看参考文献26篇

樊春雷 1   张爱玲 2  
文摘 运用态度量表和反应时实验比较了品牌态度强度与品牌态度可达性的关系性质。研究发现，女性被试对保健品品牌要素的态度评价越肯定，态度通达和提取的时间就越快，两者之间形成有规律的函数关系；但在否定性态度条件下，没有出现类似的规律性；当要求被试把模糊性态度明确为肯定或否定态度时，67％的被试明确为否定态度，但所用时间显著慢于明确为肯定态度所用的时间。
其他语种文摘 Introduction Brand attitude accessibility is related to brand attitude strength, which is usually viewed as a well-established feature of attitude strength. However, there might be accessibility difference between positive and negative attitudes, and the difference might influence the relationship between attitude accessibility and attitude strength. This study focused on whether the relationship between attitude accessibility and attitude strength is symmetric when brand evaluations changed from positive to negative. Paper-and-pencil questionnaire and response-time technique were used to investigate this question. Our hypothesis was that, a strong correlation between attitude accessibility and attitude strength would exist only when judgment on brand attributes was positive. Method One hundred seventy female subjects were consumers of the same brand of functional food (average age = 46 years old, SD=6.21), recruited through the telephone by research assistants. The subjects were asked to rate the importance of each brand attributes (29 items) about functional foods. At the first stage, subjects were asked to complete a 5 point likert-type questionnaire, to indicate the importance of each brand attributes (where 1 = least important, 5 = most important). Their responses were defined as the degree of brand attitude strength. At the second stage, brand attitude accessibility was measured. Subjects were asked to give a "Yes/No" judgment on the above mentioned responses (memory-based). If one attribute was rated as most important or more important at the first stage, the subjects should give a "Yes" response; if one attribute was rated as least important or less important at the first stage, the subjects should give a "No" response. Their response time for every judgment was recorded by the computer, as indicator of brand accessibility. Results (a) Average response speed for positive judgment on brand attributes was significantly faster than that for negative judgment on brand attributes(2993ms vs. 3617ms, F=28.72,p<0.0001). (b) When subjects had positive judgments on brand attributes, a significant power function relationship between attitude accessibility and attitude strength existed (R2=0.97, p<0.001). In contrast, when subjects had negative judgments on brand attributes, we did not find such significant function relationship (R2=0.48, p=0.06). (c) When subjects had neutral attitudes toward some brand attributes, they were asked to make a definite judgment, either positive or negative. Under this circumstance, 67% of subjects gave a negative response, and the negative response time was longer than their positive response time. Conclusion Our results indicated that, accessibility difference between positive and negative attitude did exist in brand evaluation, which supported the argument of asymmetric association between positive and negative attitude. A strong correlation between attitude strength and attitude accessibility existed only when the subjects had positive attitude towards brand attributes. This study's practical implication is that, from positive to negative (say, satisfaction to dissatisfaction), the consumer's brand evaluation does not necessarily change with the equal interval on the degree of attitude strength. We should keep in mind of this when analyzing data about brand attitudes.
来源 心理学报 ,2007,39(2):355-361 【核心库】
关键词 态度可达性 ; 态度强度 ; 反应时 ; 记忆提取
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 北京语言大学国际商学院, 北京, 100083

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
文献收藏号 CSCD:2866009

参考文献 共 26 共2页

1.  Bargh J A. Losing consciousness:Automatic influences on consumer judgment behavior and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research,2002,29:280-285 CSCD被引 6 次    
2.  Fred W M. A behavioral window on the mind of the market:An application of the response time paradigm. Brain Research Bulletin,2005,67:422-427 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  Cowley E. Recognition confidence recognition accuracy and choice. Journal of Business Research,2004,57:641-646 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Tversky A. Availability:A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology,1973,5:207-32 CSCD被引 23 次    
5.  Tulving E. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1966,5(4):381-391 CSCD被引 7 次    
6.  Butz W P. Some frontiers in social science. Science,2006,312:1898-1900 CSCD被引 2 次    
7.  Alter A L. Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,2006,103(24):9369-9372 CSCD被引 5 次    
8.  Wixted J T. On common ground:Jost's(1897)law of forgetting and Ribot's(1881)law of retrograde amnesia. Psychological Review,2004,111:864-879 CSCD被引 3 次    
9.  Stevens J P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences(3rd ed),1996 CSCD被引 1 次    
10.  Brendla C M. Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2005,41:346-368 CSCD被引 3 次    
11.  Holland R W. From repetition to conviction:Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2003,39:594-601 CSCD被引 4 次    
12.  Herr P M. Asymmetric association of liking and disliking judgments:So what's not to like?. Journal of Consumer Research,2004,30:588-601 CSCD被引 1 次    
13.  Cacioppo J T. Relationship between attitude and evaluative space:A critical review with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin,1994,115:401-423 CSCD被引 15 次    
14.  Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality:A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. The American Economic Review,2003,92:1449-1475 CSCD被引 35 次    
15.  Koriat A. How do we know what we know?The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review,1993,100:609-639 CSCD被引 14 次    
16.  Schwarz N. Ease of retrieval as information:Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61:195-202 CSCD被引 7 次    
17.  Tulving E. Interview. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1991,3:89-94 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  Feldman J M. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief attitude intention and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,1988,73:421-435 CSCD被引 17 次    
19.  Albarracín D. The cognitive impact of past behavior influences on beliefs,attitudes,and future behavioral decisions.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,79:5-22 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Kokkinaki F. The relationship between involvement attitude accessibility and attitude-behaviour consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology,1997,36:497-509 CSCD被引 2 次    
引证文献 2 篇

1 周洁 态度结构一致性及其对态度和行为的影响 心理科学进展,2009,17(5):1088-1093
CSCD被引 1 次

2 袁潇 反事实思维对行人交通安全行为意向的影响 心理科学,2015,38(2):388-393
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有2篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号