重庆中坝遗址剖面磁化率异常与人类活动的关系
Relationship between Abnormal Phenomena of Magnetic Susceptibility Curves of Profiles and Human Activities at Zhongba Site in Chongqing
查看参考文献37篇
|
文摘
|
结合古器物推定及14C测定年代、人类遗存遗迹和堆积物自然属性特征,重庆中坝考古遗址多剖面地层高分辨率采样的质量磁化率(SI)综合对比研究表明:磁化率分布表现异常.在很大程度上已掩盖了气候变化、成土作用等因素对地层磁化率分布的贡献,反映遗址堆积物曾受到人类长期异常强烈的改造.堆积物来源主要以文化器物碎片、人为带入的自然碎屑物和频繁的洪水沉积物为主.碎陶片集中(尤其红陶)的文化层表现为高磁化率值,其中多次异常高值的出现可能与此时高强度用火、大规模燃烧等事件致使土层磁性矿物增加有关;而"洪水扰动层"则表现为低磁化率值.进一步分析曲线还可发现,中坝地区新石器末至唐代是人类活动的活跃期.宋以后人类活动有逐渐减弱的趋势,其中新石器时代末、夏商中期、西周早中期、春秋时期、战国中晚期、六朝时期及唐代为活跃期中的旺盛阶段.新石器晚期、夏商早期、西周早期、春秋晚期、战国早期、宋代、明清和现代地层中洪水扰动明显,推断为洪水频发时代或此间曾出现过特大洪水. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Based upon the ages inferred by cultural relicts, AMS I4C dating, phenomena of human activitices and characteristics of magnetic susceptibility (SI) curves of profiles at Zhongba Site in Chongqing, we find that the contribution of climate change and soil fonnation to the distribution of magnetic susceptibility values in stratum is concealed by the impact of the abnormally strong human activitices for a long time. The results of analysis indicate that the sources of accumulation at Zhongba Site include mainly enormous ceramics fragments, natural scrap materials from human activities and flood deposits. The cultural layers gathered with a large number of ceramics fragments (red pottery particularly) show high magnetic susceptibility values, among them, the especially abnormal high values may be concerned with the increase of the magnetic materials caused by mankind's using the fire and burning on a large-scale at that time; on the other hand, the "flood disturbed layers" usaully show low magnetic susceptibility values. Based on further analyses of the magnetic susceptibility curves, we can still find that the active epoches of human activities was from the final stage of the Neolithic Age to the Tang Dynasty, and human activities began to tend to be weakening after the Song Dynasty. During the active epoch, the final stage of the Neolithic Age, the middle period of the Xia and Shang dynasties, the early and middle periods of Western Zhou Dynasty, Spring and Autumn Period, middle and late stages of the Warring States, the middle period of the Six Dynasties and Tang Dynasty were in the periods of great prosperity. However, there are obvious flood disturbed deposits included in the layers of the late stage of the Neolithic Age, the early period of the Xia and Shang dynasties, the early period of Western Zhou Dynasty, the late period of Spring and Autumn Period, the early period of the Warring States, Song Dynasty, Ming and Qing dynasties and modern period, which can be inferred to be the ages of the occurrence of severe floods. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2007,62(3):257-267 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
重庆忠县
;
中坝遗址
;
质量磁化率
;
堆积物来源
;
人类活动
;
洪水扰动层
|
|
地址
|
1.
南京大学海洋与地理科学学院, 南京, 210093
2.
四川省文物考古研究院, 成都, 610041
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金
;
中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室基金
;
南京大学985工程自然地理学科建设项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2712542
|
参考文献 共
37
共2页
|
|
1.
Thompson R. Environmental applications of magnetic measurements.
Science,1980,207:481-486
|
CSCD被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
An Z S. Episode of strengthened summer monsoon climate of Younger Dryas age on the Loess Plateau of central China.
Quaternary Research,1993,39:45-54
|
CSCD被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
安芷生.
环境磁学初步研究,1991:143-151
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
韩家懋. 马兰黄土与离石黄土的磁学性质.
第四纪研究,1991(4):310-325
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
刘秀明. 中国黄土磁性矿物特征及其古气候意义.
第四纪研究,1993(3):281-287
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Stefanie A B. A 13200 year history of century to millennial-scale paleo-environmental change magnetically recorded in the Palmer Deep,westem Antarctic Peninsula..
Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2002,194:311-326
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Beget J. Paleoclimatic forcing of magnetic susceptibility variations in Alaskan loess during the late Quatemary.
Geology,1990,18:40-43
|
CSCD被引
43
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Netajirao R. Sharp decrease in summer monsoon strength 4,000～35,000 cal yr B.P.in the central higher Himalaya of India based on pollen evidence from alpine peat.
Quatemary Research,2000,53:122-129
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Maher B A. Mineral magnetic record of the Chinese loess and palaeosol.
Geology,1991,19:3-6
|
CSCD被引
71
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Kukla G. Loess stratigraphy in central China.
Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,1989,72:203-225
|
CSCD被引
106
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Maher B A. Magnetic properties of modern soil and Quaternary loessic paleosols:paleoclimatic implications.
Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,1998,137:25-54
|
CSCD被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Heller F. Magnetism of Chinese loess deposits.
Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society,1984,77:125-141
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Meng X. Origin of the magnetic susceptibility signal in Chinese loess.
Quaternary Science Review,1997,16:833-839
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
贾蓉芬. 陕西段家坡黄土剖面中趋磁细菌特征与环境意义.
中国科学(D辑),1996,26(5):411-416
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
范围昌. 我国超磁细菌的分布及其磁小体的研究.
科学通报,1996,41(4):349-352
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
吕厚远. C3, C4植物及燃烧对土壤磁化率的影响.
中国科学(D辑),2001,31(1):43-53
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Kletetschka G. Magnetic stratigraphy of Chinese loess as a record of natural fires.
Geophysical Research Letters,1995,22:1341-1343
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
王建. 磁化率与粒度、矿物的关系及其古环境意义.
地理学报,1996,51(2):155-163
|
CSCD被引
114
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
朱诚. 江苏龙虬庄新石器遗址环境考古研究.
南京大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(3):286-292
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
张强. 重庆巫山张家湾遗址2000年来的环境考古.
地理学报,2001,56(6):353-360
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问