帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

动词隐含因果性和重读对代词加工的影响
The Effects of Implicit Verb Causality and Accentuation on Pronoun Processing

查看参考文献26篇

文摘 采用听觉动窗法和跨通道探测技术，设计3个实验考察了汉语口语句子理解中，动词隐含因果性和重读对代词加工的影响及其时间进程。实验1中自变量为动词类型和韵律特征；实验2、3中增加探测词类型变量。结果发现：动词隐含因果性影响代词的指认方向；当代词不重读时，动词隐含因果性在遇到代词后立即影响代词可能先行词的激活水平。代词重读影响“因为”分句的阅读时间，且在代词后立即影响主语型动词语句中代词的加工。
其他语种文摘 Introduction There are many factors influencing pronoun processing in spoken language comprehension, such as implicit verb causality and accentuation. Numerous studies （ McDonald ＆ MacWhinney, 1995 ; Garnham, Traxler ＆ Oakhill, et al, 1996 ; Debra ＆ Long, 2000; Sun Y, Shu H, Zheng X, et al 2001 ） have shown that implicit verb causality influenced pronouns resolution. Focus hypothesis and integration hypothesis（ Stewart, 2000）both claim that implicit causality makes some candidate antecedent prominent. However, these studies are not consistent on its time course on pronoun processing： on line or off line. In spoken language domain, researchers（Akmajian, 1970; Cahn, 1995; Kameyama, 1999; Venditti,Stone ＆ Tepper, 2001; Wang D ＆ Yang Y, 2004） have studied the effect of accentuation on pronoun processing but have not come to a conclusion. Some researchers claim that stressed pronoun shifts the center of attention, whereas others argue that it only works in parallel-structure sentences. As mentioned above, different prominence of candidate antecedents arisen by implicit verb causality provides us a natural instance for observing the effect of accentuation. The present study aimed to explore the effects of implicit verb causality and accentuation on pronoun processing during spoken Chinese sentence comprehension as well as their time course, using auditory moving window technique （ experiment 1 ） and cross-modal probe method （ experiment 2 and 3 ）, by comparing the comprehension time, percentage of choosing NP1, reaction time to probe words between NP1 verb and NP2 verb level, stressed pronoun and unstressed pronoun level. Method One hundred and one paid volunteers participated in the study （30, 20, and 21 in experiments 1,2, and 3, respectively）. In the self-paced listening paradigm, participants listened to the sentences clause-by-clause and interpreted the pronoun. In the cross-modal probe procedure, sentences were presented by earphone and the probe word （NP1, NP2） was presented on screen. In experiment 2, participants reacted at once when the sentence ended. In experiment 3,participants responded as soon as encountering the pronoun. Results The result of experiment 1 showed that percentage of choosing NP1 in NP1 verb than that in NP2 verb condition, and that reading time of the second clause in stressed condition was significantly higher pronoun condition was significantly longer than that in unstressed pronoun condition. The result of experiment 2 showed that in NP1 verb condition, RT （reaction time） to NP1 was significantly shorter than that to NP2, whereas in NP2 verb condition, the probe time was similar. In NP1 verb condition, RT to NP1 in stressed pronoun condition was significantly longer than that of unstressed condition, whereas RT to NP2, the reverse tendency was observed. The results of experiment 3 were similar to those in experiment 2, except that RT to NP2 did not achievesignificant level. Conclusions This study supported the focus hypothesis, which indicates that implicit verb causality influences pronoun processing immediately. Accentuation could shift the center of attention even in nonparallel-structure sentences ; there were interaction between implicit verb causality and accentuation during spoken sentence comprehension.
来源 心理学报 ,2006,38(4):497-506 【核心库】
关键词 口语句子理解 ; 动词隐含因果性 ; 重读 ; 代词解决
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:2662954

参考文献 共 26 共2页

1.  Harley T. The psychology of language:from data to theory. The psychology of language:from data to theory,2001:322-326 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Rudolph U. The psychological causality implicit in verbs:A review. Psychological Bulletin,1997,121:192-218 CSCD被引 2 次    
3.  Caramazza A. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learing and Verbal Behavior,1977,16:601-609 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Mckoon G. Discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learing,Memory and Cognition,1993,19(5):1040-1052 CSCD被引 3 次    
5.  Millis K. The influence of connectives on sentences comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language,1994,33:128-147 CSCD被引 2 次    
6.  McDonald J L. The time course of pronoun resolution:Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language,1995,34:543-566 CSCD被引 3 次    
7.  Garnham A. The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language,1996,35:517-543 CSCD被引 2 次    
8.  Stewart A J. The time course of the influence of implicit causality information:Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language,2000,42:423-443 CSCD被引 3 次    
9.  Debra L L. Implicit causality and discourse focus:the interaction of text and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language,2000,42:545-570 CSCD被引 1 次    
10.  孙燕. 动词隐含因果性对代词加工的影响. 心理科学,2001,24(1):39-41 CSCD被引 2 次    
11.  孙燕. 汉语动词隐含因果性对代词指认的影响. 汉语动词隐含因果性对代词指认的影响[硕士论文],2001 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  缪小春. 动词词义和句子语法对代词加工的影响. 心理科学,1995,18(4):197-200 CSCD被引 5 次    
13.  Akmajian A. Coreferentiality and stress. Linguistic Inquiry,1970,1(1):124-126 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Cahn J. The effects of pitch accenting on pronoun referent resolution. Proc of the Association for Computational Lingustics (ACL),1995:190-193 CSCD被引 1 次    
15.  Kameyama M. Stressed and unstressed pronouns:complementary preferences. Focus:Linguistic,Cognitive,and Computational Perspectives,1999:306-321 CSCD被引 2 次    
16.  Dahan D. Accent and referent resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language,2002,47(2):292-314 CSCD被引 7 次    
17.  Venditti J J. Toward an account of accented pronoun interpretation in discourse context:Evidence from eye-tracking. Toward an account of accented pronoun interpretation in discourse context:Evidence from eye-tracking,2001:unpublished manuscript CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  王丹. 信息结构和重音对话语理解的影响. 信息结构和重音对话语理解的影响[博士论文],2004:46-50 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  Titone D. Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing:effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening. Memory and Cognition,2000,28(6):1029-1040 CSCD被引 3 次    
20.  Titone D. Memory and encoding of spoken discourse following right hemisphere damage:Evidence from the auditory moving window(AMW)Technique. Brain and Language,2001(77):10-24 CSCD被引 2 次    
引证文献 3 篇

1 赵鸣 语言回指加工的ERP研究述评 心理科学进展,2011,19(3):355-363
CSCD被引 0 次

2 徐晓东 汉语焦点信息影响代词回指的电生理机制 心理科学进展,2014,22(6):902-910
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号